ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0237

Oral Urate-Lowering Therapy Use and Efficacy Following Pegloticase Treatment: Findings from a Rheumatology Network Database

Lissa Padnick-Silver1, Andrew Concoff2, Hong-Ye Gao1, Qianhong Fu1, Brian LaMoreaux1 and N. Lawrence Edwards3, 1Horizon Therapeutics, Deerfield, IL, 2United Rheumatology, Happauge, NY, 3University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: gout, Uric Acid, Urate

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0229–0251) Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Pegloticase, a recombinant pegylated uricase, rapidly reduces serum urate (SU) in patients refractory to/intolerant of oral urate-lowering therapies (ULTs).1,2 However, pegloticase is generally used for ≤1 year for intensive SU-lowering and subsequent urate burden depletion. Optimal post-pegloticase treatment has not yet been established, but use and efficacy of oral ULTs remains an important unanswered clinical question. This analysis retrospectively examined data from a large US rheumatology database to better understand real-world practice patterns of post-pegloticase oral ULT use and to preliminarily examine post-pegloticase oral ULT efficacy.

Methods: Patients in the UR-NICE data repository who had first pegloticase infusion code (J2507) between 2012 and 2022 were included in analyses. The beginning and end of therapy was defined as the date of first and last pegloticase infusion code, respectively. All patients were in the database for ≥60 days following last infusion. Oral ULT use (allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid) before and after pegloticase therapy was examined. Patients were also stratified by those that did and did not receive ≥12 infusions (considered as “full course” in prior retrospective studies3). Patient characteristics prior to pegloticase therapy were also examined to help characterize the pegloticase-treated population.

Results: 211 patients (77% male; mean[±SD] age: 62.7±12.8 years, BMI: 32.9±7.2 kg/m2, eGFR: 66.0±24.7 ml/min/1.73m2 [46% eGFR < 60]) were included. 74% had tophaceous gout and pre-pegloticase SU was 7.9±2.5 mg/dL (n=148). Available inflammatory biomarkers were moderately elevated (median CRP: 3.3 mg/dL [n=114], neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR]4: 2.9 [n=41]). 141 patients (67%) had pre-pegloticase oral ULT use noted (73% allopurinol, 48% febuxostat, and/or 18% probenecid). Patients received a mean (±SD) of 12.3±12.6 pegloticase infusions (median: 9; 88 [42%] received ≥12), with a 2.2±2.0 wk dosing interval. Following last infusion, 115 patients (55%) began oral ULT (67% allopurinol, 44% febuxostat, and/or 17% probenecid), most (67%) within 30 days of last pegloticase infusion. More patients who received ≥12 infusions had an SU < 6 mg/dL when treated with post-pegloticase oral ULT than those who received < 12 infusions (first post-ULT SU < 6 mg/dL: 78% vs 36%; mean SU: 4.7±3.0 [n=37] vs 7.4±2.9 mg/dL [n=47]).

Conclusion: These pegloticase-treated patients reflected a typical uncontrolled gout population. Two-thirds of patients began oral ULT after pegloticase, most within 30 days of last infusion. Patients who had a longer pegloticase course (≥12 infusions) were more likely to have post-treatment oral ULT efficacy, perhaps because of greater urate burden depletion. These data suggest oral ULTs may be effective after successful pegloticase therapy but further prospective studies are needed to verify our findings and better understand how overall urate burden may influence oral ULT efficacy.

References
1. Sundy JS, et al. JAMA 2011;306:711-20.
2. Botson JK, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2023;75:293-304.
3. Keenan RT, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021;51:347-52.
4. Forget P, et al. BMC Res Notes 2017;10:12.


Disclosures: L. Padnick-Silver: Horizon Therapeutics, 3, 12, Stockholder; A. Concoff: Exagen, Inc., 3, United Rheumatology, 3; H. Gao: Horizon Therapeutics, 12, Paid contractor; Q. Fu: Horizon Therapeutics, 3, 12, Stockholder; B. LaMoreaux: Horizon Therapeutics, 3, 11; N. Edwards: Horizon Therapeutics, 2, United Rheumatology, 12, Medical Policy Committee Member.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Padnick-Silver L, Concoff A, Gao H, Fu Q, LaMoreaux B, Edwards N. Oral Urate-Lowering Therapy Use and Efficacy Following Pegloticase Treatment: Findings from a Rheumatology Network Database [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/oral-urate-lowering-therapy-use-and-efficacy-following-pegloticase-treatment-findings-from-a-rheumatology-network-database/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/oral-urate-lowering-therapy-use-and-efficacy-following-pegloticase-treatment-findings-from-a-rheumatology-network-database/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology