ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 710

Optical Density Measure of the Papillary Dermis Discriminates As Abnormal Clinically Uninvolved Skin in Systemic Sclerosis and Correlates with Severity of Skin Thickness

Giuseppina Abignano1, Sibel Z. Aydin2, Concepcion Castillo-Gallego3, Daniel Woods4, Adam Meekings5, Dennis McGonagle6, Paul Emery7 and Francesco Del Galdo8, 1Chapel Allerton Hospital Leeds Insitute of Molecular medicine, Division of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine and LMBRU, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2Unit of Rheumatology, Medeniyet University, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, 3Rheumatology, Hospital La Paz - IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain, 4Michelson Diagnostics Ltd, Kent, United Kingdom, 5Michelson Diagnostics Ltd, Kent, United Kingdom, Kent, United Kingdom, 6Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 7Division of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine and LMBRU, Leeds, United Kingdom, 8Musculoskeletal Diseases, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine and LMBRU, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biomarkers, imaging techniques, Outcome measures, scleroderma and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud’s – Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Skin involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is often primary outcome in clinical trials and its severity inversely correlates with prognosis. Nevertheless, an objective quantitative imaging biomarker to assess skin fibrosis is still lacking in SSc. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is a imaging technology that measures optical density (OD) of a substrate and can provide high contrast 2 mm deep skin images with a 5-10 micron resolution. Concurrent validity and reliability of such technique to assess skin involvement in SSc have been previously reported.1The aim of this study was to determine whether OD of the dermis as assessed by OCT could be used to quantitatively discriminate healthy skin from clinically uninvolved SSc skin and to correlate with clinical assessment of skin thickness in SSc patients (construct validity).

Methods: A total of 393 OCT scans of hands and forearms on 20 SSc patients and 15 healthy controls (HC) were performed employing topical probe “VivoSight” (Michelson Diagnostics). Matlab software was employed to calculate mean OD of the scans. Signal changes within epidermis (ED), Dermal-Epidermal Junction (DEJ) and dermis of SSc patients and HC were analysed and collated to a unique graph. Construct validity was determined by correlation with the current gold standard, the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRss). The minimum (Min) value of OD before the dermis and the maximum (Max) value of OD in the dermis were considered to compare the forearm skin OCT mean A-scans of SSc patients and HC. ROC analysis of HC and mRSS=0 mean A-scans suggested that the OD value at 300 (± 16) micron was the one with best sensitivity/specificity ratio in discriminating HC vs clinically unaffected skin. We therefore included the mean value of OD at 300±16 micron for further analysis. Statistical analysis was performed employing Pearson correlation, one-way Anova and Bonferroni correction tests as appropriate.

Results: OCT mean A-Scans showed a different pattern in HC and four mRSS groups. SSc affected skin showed a consistent decrease of OD in the papillary dermis (PD), which caused a loss of definition of the DEJ. Max OD values of the PD in HC and the four mRSS subgroups was significantly different across the five groups (P<0.0001) and showed a significant correlation with mRSS (r=-0.69, P<0.0001). Similarly, Min OD values were significantly different across the five groups (P<0.0001) and showed a strong correlation with mRSS (r=-0.6, P=0.0002). In both cases after Bonferroni correction for multiple variables, the difference in Min and Max OD remained significant between HC or mRSS=0 and patients with mRSS=2 or 3, suggesting that these measures correlated with skin involvement but could not discriminate between HC and patients with mRSS=0 or 1. On the contrary, OD300 was significantly different between HC and patients with mRSS=0 or 1 (P<0.001).

Conclusion:

The decrease of OD in the PD in skin fibrosis as assessed by OCT is a valid quantitative outcome measure of skin fibrosis. Sensitivity to change ability of OCT is under evaluation to determine whether the technique could be used as outcome measure of skin involvement in SSc in clinical intervention trials and clinical management.

References:

1.Abignano et al. Annals Rheum Dis 2012


Disclosure:

G. Abignano,
None;

S. Z. Aydin,
None;

C. Castillo-Gallego,
None;

D. Woods,

Michelson Diagnostics,

3;

A. Meekings,

Michelson Diagnostics,

3;

D. McGonagle,
None;

P. Emery,
None;

F. Del Galdo,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/optical-density-measure-of-the-papillary-dermis-discriminates-as-abnormal-clinically-uninvolved-skin-in-systemic-sclerosis-and-correlates-with-severity-of-skin-thickness/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology