ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1386

Opioid Prescription Rates in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis in the UK Between 2001-2020: An Electronic Health Records (EHR) Analysis

Huseyin Berk Degirmenci1, Christine E. Peloquin2, Sara Lodi2, Pedro Machado3, S. Reza Jafarzadeh4, Tuhina Neogi5, Lianne Gensler6, Maureen Dubreuil7 and Jean Liew2, 1St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, 2Boston University, Boston, MA, 3Centre for Rheumatology & Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK. Department of Rheumatology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS trust, London, UK., London, United Kingdom, 4Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 5Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 6University of California San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, San Francisco, CA, 7Department of Rheumatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Milton, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Epidemiology, pain, Pharmacoepidemiology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1383–1411) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II: Imaging & AS

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Although current axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) management guidelines do not address opioid use for chronic pain, available data show that opioid use is common among this population despite widespread uptake of effective biologic therapies, including TNF inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors. We examined temporal trends in opioid prescription for individuals with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the United Kingdom (UK) before and after effective immunomodulatory agents have become available in the mid-2000s.

Methods: We used the IQVIA Medical Research Database (IMRD), incorporating data from THIN, a Cegedim database, an electronic health record database collected by general practitioners throughout the UK. We included adults aged 18-89 from 2000-2020 with AS, defined by ≥2 diagnostic Read codes (coded thesaurus of clinical terms used in the National Health Service since 1985) ≥7 days apart, and ≥1 year data prior to AS diagnosis. Baseline was defined as the date of the second AS diagnosis code. We excluded individuals with ≥2 rheumatoid arthritis Read codes prior to baseline. Individuals were followed until censoring at the date of codes for hospice or palliative care services, death, or end of the study (12/2020). Clinical characteristics included age, gender, baseline treatments for AS (defined within 1 year prior to the index date), and the presence of specific comorbidities (defined using Read codes any time prior to the index date). We calculated annual prescription rates from 2001-2020 for opioids and NSAIDs (comparator drug), as the number of prescriptions in a calendar year divided by person-time contributed by enrolled subjects meeting inclusion criteria for the year. Biologic prescription rates were not adequately captured in this general practitioner-entered database and thus not reported.

Results: We identified 2094 individuals with incident AS (mean age 47 years, 74.6% male, median follow-up time of 6.2 years with interquartile range 2.8-10.6 years). Of these, 395 (18.9%) had history of hypertension, 128 (6.1%) had history of cardiovascular disease, 72 (3.4%) had chronic kidney disease, and 70 (3.3%) had history of cancer. Baseline conventional synthetic DMARD use was present in 10.9% and glucocorticoid use in 10.4%. Opioid prescription rates were relatively unchanged over time with a range of 3.04-4.51 prescriptions per person-year (PY) from 2001-2020 whereas NSAID rates declined over time from 5.90 prescriptions per PY in 2001 to 2.69 per PY in 2020 (Figure).

Conclusion: In this UK-based AS cohort, opioid prescription rates remained relatively stable between 2001-2020 whereas NSAID use decreased over time consonant with the uptake of effective biologic therapies. Further, the rates of opioid prescriptions were similar in range to that of NSAID prescriptions. These findings may indicate inadequate pain control in AS despite the introduction and uptake of effective biologic agents.

Supporting image 1

FIGURE
Annual prescription rates of opioids and NSAIDs among people with ankylosing spondylitis in the IQVIA Medical Research Database 2001_2020


Disclosures: H. Degirmenci: None; C. Peloquin: None; S. Lodi: None; P. Machado: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Merck/MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Orphazyme, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; S. Jafarzadeh: None; T. Neogi: None; L. Gensler: AbbVie, 2, Acelyrin, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Janssen, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB Pharma, 2, 5; M. Dubreuil: Amgen, 2, Pfizer, 5, UCB Pharma, 2; J. Liew: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Degirmenci H, Peloquin C, Lodi S, Machado P, Jafarzadeh S, Neogi T, Gensler L, Dubreuil M, Liew J. Opioid Prescription Rates in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis in the UK Between 2001-2020: An Electronic Health Records (EHR) Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/opioid-prescription-rates-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-in-the-uk-between-2001-2020-an-electronic-health-records-ehr-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/opioid-prescription-rates-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-in-the-uk-between-2001-2020-an-electronic-health-records-ehr-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology