ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
    • 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
    • 2017 ACR/ARHP PRSYM
    • 2016-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • Meeting Resource Center

Abstract Number: 1865

Novel Approach to Arthritis Surveillance Suggests a Much Higher Prevalence of Arthritis Among US Adults Than Previous Estimate

S. Reza Jafarzadeh and David T. Felson, Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Arthritis, Data analysis, diagnostic criteria and epidemiologic methods, Diagnostic Tests

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Session Title: ACR/ARHP Combined: Epidemiology and Public Health: Prevention, Recognition, and Treatment

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Current national estimates of arthritis prevalence in the United States rely on a single survey question about doctor-diagnosed arthritis from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) without using survey information on joint symptoms. In a validation study of these NHIS questions, some persons with only joint symptoms were found to have arthritis when examined by trained rheumatology nurses who excluded those with asymptomatic findings. The validation study suggested that the current surveillance definition of doctor-diagnosed arthritis had only 53% sensitivity among adults between 45-64 years of age resulting in missing nearly half of arthritis cases in that age group. The substantial misclassification as a result of the current imperfect surveillance definition would result in a marked underestimation of prevalence. We aimed to estimate arthritis prevalence, using the term ‘true’ to represent estimates that are adjusted for the imperfect sensitivity and specificity of the current surveillance definition, and the term ‘apparent’ to represent ordinary proportion estimates which fail to so adjust.

Methods: Using the 2015 NHIS, we developed a Bayesian multinomial latent class model for arthritis surveillance criteria based on NHIS questions on joint symptoms and whether symptom duration exceeded three months in addition to a question about doctor-diagnosed arthritis. The NHIS questions explicitly ask subjects to exclude back and neck pain from the reports of joint pain or arthritis. Our Bayesian approach accounted for the imperfect (i.e. <100%) sensitivity and specificity of each criterion in addition to accounting for the correlation between chronic joint symptoms and doctor-diagnosed arthritis in the survey.

Results: Of 33,672 participants in the 2015 NHIS, 19.3% (2,242/11,597) of men and 16.7% (2,294/13,697) of women between 18-64 years of age reported joint symptoms without doctor-diagnosed arthritis; estimates were 15.7% (545/3,474) and 13.5% (660/4,904), respectively, for those ≥65 years old. Bayesian posterior estimates and the corresponding 95% probability intervals (PI) for the ‘true’ prevalences in the 4 sub-populations stratified by age and sex are presented in the Table. Based on our estimates of ‘true’ prevalence, arthritis affected 91.2 (of 247.7; 36.8%) million adults in the US in 2015, which included 61.1 (of 199.9; 30.6%) million persons between 18-64 years of age. Our estimate for arthritis prevalence in 2015 is 68% higher than that previously reported based on the doctor-diagnosed arthritis question of 54.4 (22.7%) million adults.

Conclusion: Arthritis prevalence in the US population has been substantially underestimated, especially among adults <65. Our results may partially explain recent surge in arthritis-related healthcare utilizations such as total knee replacement, especially among younger adults.

Table. Estimates for the Prevalence of Arthritis Among US Adults in 2015
Sex Age (Years) ‘Apparent’ Prevalence of Doctor-Diagnosed Arthritis in NHIS (Individuals) ‘Ture’ Prevalence of Arthritis (95% Bayesian Probability Interval) US Adults with Arthritis Based on ‘True’ Prevalence (Millions)
Men 18-64 15.0% (1,740/11,597) 29.9% (23.4%, 42.3%) 29.8 (of 99.6)
Women 18-64 20.0% (2,734/13,697) 31.2% (25.8%, 44.1%) 31.3 (of 100.0)
Men ≥65 43.5% (1,511/3,474) 55.8% (49.9%, 70.4%) 11.8 (of 21.1)
Women ≥65 55.1% (2,704/4,904) 68.7% (62.1%, 79.9%) 18.3 (of 26.7)

Disclosure: S. R. Jafarzadeh, None; D. T. Felson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jafarzadeh SR, Felson DT. Novel Approach to Arthritis Surveillance Suggests a Much Higher Prevalence of Arthritis Among US Adults Than Previous Estimate [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/novel-approach-to-arthritis-surveillance-suggests-a-much-higher-prevalence-of-arthritis-among-us-adults-than-previous-estimate/. Accessed May 19, 2022.
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/novel-approach-to-arthritis-surveillance-suggests-a-much-higher-prevalence-of-arthritis-among-us-adults-than-previous-estimate/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

ACR Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium 2020

© COPYRIGHT 2022 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Wiley

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
  • Advanced Search
  • Meeting Resource Center
  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.