ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0239

Neutralising Antibody Responses to Bivalent SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and Hybrid Immunity in Patients on TNF Inhibitors: A Prospective Cohort Study

Hilde S. Ørbo1, Taissa M. Kasahara2, Asia-Sophia Wolf3, Kristin H. Bjørlykke4, Joseph Sexton5, Ingrid Jyssum5, Anne Therese Tveter5, Guri Solum3, Ingrid Fadum Kjønstad3, Andreas Lind6, Veselka Petrova Dimova-Svetoslavova6, Tore K. Kvien7, Jørgen Jahnsen8, Espen A. Haavardsholm1, Ludvig A. Munthe9, Sella A. Provan5, John Torgils Vaage9, Siri Mjaaland3, Kristin K. Jørgensen4, Gunnveig Grødeland9, Silje W. Syversen10 and Guro L. Goll10, 1Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, and University of Oslo (UiO), Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway, 2University of Oslo (UiO), Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway, 3Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Section for Immunology, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway, 4Akershus University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Lørenskog, Norway, 5Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway, 6Oslo University Hospital, Department of Microbiology, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway, 7Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway and University of Oslo (UiO), Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway, 8Akershus University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Lørenskog, Norway and University of Oslo (UiO), Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway, 9Oslo University Hospital, Department of Immunology, Oslo, Norway, and University of Oslo (UiO), Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway, 10Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, and University of Oslo (UiO), Institute of Health and Society, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, Cohort Study, COVID-19, immunology, prevention

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Infection-related Rheumatic Disease Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The SARS-CoV-2 virus mutates continuously, posing challenges for patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). These patients often have diminished vaccine responses and are at a higher risk of severe infections. The efficacy of the recommended mono- and bivalent vaccine boosters in this patient population remains unclear. 

The objective of this study was to assess the neutralizing capacity and anti-spike antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in TNFi-treated IMID patients, after receiving a monovalent 4th vaccine dose and a bivalent 5th vaccine dose, compared to those with hybrid immunity. 

Methods: These analyses from the ongoing observational Nor-vaC study included TNFi-treated IMID patients who received either a 5th vaccine dose or experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection following a 4th vaccine dose (hybrid immunity).

Blood samples were collected 2-4 weeks after the 4th monovalent vaccine dose and after either subsequent COVID-19 or a 5th bivalent dose (BA.1 or BA.4/5).

Neutralizing antibody titres against three viral variants (Wuhan (WT), Omicron BA.1, and Omicron BA.4), and IgG anti-spike antibody levels, were analysed. Group comparisons were performed with Mann Whitney U test.

Results: From December 17, 2021, to June 20, 2023, 371 IMID patients (86 rheumatoid arthritis, 72 psoriatic arthritis, 95 spondyloarthritis, 75 Crohn’s disease, 43 ulcerative colitis) on TNFi in mono- (60%) or combination (40%) therapy received a 4th and a 5th vaccine dose or had a SARS-CoV-2 infection after the 4th vaccine dose, median age 58 (IQR 48-67), 53 % female.

In total, 322 patients, received a 5th bivalent vaccine dose, either BA.1 (40%), BA.4/5 vaccine (60%). Overall, 180 (49%) had COVID-19 following a 4th vaccine dose (4th hybrid). All infections occurred while BA.1, BA.4 and BA.5 were the circulating variants.

Patients with hybrid immunity had a higher median anti-spike antibody level than did infection-naïve patients following the 5th dose BA.1 vaccine (p=0.0015), but comparable to levels after a 5th BA.4/5 vaccine dose (p=0.24) (figure A, table). Hybrid immunity increased neutralizing antibody titres against all tested variants compared to a 4th vaccine dose (WT: p< 0.0001), BA1: p< 0.0001, BA4: p< 0.0001) and 5th vaccine dose with BA.1 (WT: p< 0.0001, BA1: p=0.0002, BA4: p< 0.0001) (figure B, table).

In infection-naïve patients, a 5th BA.4/5 vaccine increased neutralizing antibody titres against all viral variants tested (WT, BA.1 and BA.4), compared to post-4th dose levels (WT: p=0.011, BA.1: p=0.001, BA.4: p=0.0001) (figure B, table). In infection-naïve patients, a 5th BA.4/5 vaccine gave higher neutralizing antibody responses against BA.4 than a 5th BA.1 vaccine (p=0.023) and comparable to that after hybrid immunity (p=0.16) (figure B, table).

Conclusion: In IMID patients on TNFi who reported COVID-19 as a fifth antigenic exposure, neutralising antibody capacity was superior to that following a fifth updated, bivalent vaccine in patients that were infection-naïve. Infection-naïve patients benefit from the most updated vaccine, providing a humoral response almost comparable to that following infection.

Supporting image 1

Figure: Anti-spike antibody levels (A) in infection-naïve patients following a 4th monovalent dose (4th dose), and a 5th bivalent dose distributed by type of vaccine (5th BA.1 vs 5th BA4.5), and in patients with COVID_19 following a 4th dose (4th dose hybrid) and neutralising titres (B) following these immunisations. # <0.05 (compared to 4th dose) † <0.05 (compared to 5th dose BA.4/5). *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, **** p<0.0001.

Supporting image 2

Table: Comparisons of anti-spike antibodies and neutralizing antibodies (NAb) following four monovalent vaccine doses in infection-naïve individuals (4th dose), following a 5th bivalent vaccine dose with either BA.1 (5th dose BA.1) or BA.4/5 (5th dose BA.4/5) in patients without prior infection, and in patients with prior infection between the 4th monovalent and the 5th bivalent vaccine dose (4th dose hybrid).


Disclosures: H. Ørbo: None; T. Kasahara: None; A. Wolf: None; K. Bjørlykke: Janssen-Cilag, 6; J. Sexton: None; I. Jyssum: None; A. Tveter: None; G. Solum: None; I. Kjønstad: None; A. Lind: None; V. Dimova-Svetoslavova: None; T. Kvien: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Galapagos, 5, Gilead, 2, Grünenthal, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sandoz, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 5; J. Jahnsen: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 3, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 6, Galapagos, 1, 6, Gilead, 1, 6, Janssen, 1, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, Roche, 1, 6, Sandoz, 1, 6, Takeda, 1, 6; E. Haavardsholm: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Gilead, 2, Janssen, 2, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2; L. Munthe: Incyte, 6, Janssen, 6; S. Provan: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2; J. Vaage: None; S. Mjaaland: None; K. Jørgensen: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 6, Roche, 6; G. Grødeland: AstraZeneca, 1, Bayer, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 6, Janssen, 1, Moderna, 1, Pfizer, 6, Sanofi, 6, Seqirus, 1, ThermoFisher, 6; S. Syversen: AstraZeneca, 1; G. Goll: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 6, Galapagos, 1, 6, Novartis, 1, Pfizer, 1, 6, UCB, 1, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ørbo H, Kasahara T, Wolf A, Bjørlykke K, Sexton J, Jyssum I, Tveter A, Solum G, Kjønstad I, Lind A, Dimova-Svetoslavova V, Kvien T, Jahnsen J, Haavardsholm E, Munthe L, Provan S, Vaage J, Mjaaland S, Jørgensen K, Grødeland G, Syversen S, Goll G. Neutralising Antibody Responses to Bivalent SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and Hybrid Immunity in Patients on TNF Inhibitors: A Prospective Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neutralising-antibody-responses-to-bivalent-sars-cov-2-vaccines-and-hybrid-immunity-in-patients-on-tnf-inhibitors-a-prospective-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neutralising-antibody-responses-to-bivalent-sars-cov-2-vaccines-and-hybrid-immunity-in-patients-on-tnf-inhibitors-a-prospective-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology