ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0261

Methotrexate Withdrawal and Outcomes in Participants with Well-controlled Non-systemic JIA Within the CARRA Registry

Marinka Twilt1, Kevin Baszis2, Sarah Ringold3, Timothy Beukelman4, Anne Dennos5, Peter Shrader6 and Daniel Horton7, 1Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, 3Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, 4University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Duke University, Durham, NC, 6Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, 7Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Pediatric rheumatology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical Poster I: JIA (0241–0265)

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Methotrexate (MTX) is currently the recommended first-line conventional DMARD for the treatment of JIA with oligo- or polyarthritis. There are limited data on how or when to stop MTX monotherapy for well-controlled JIA. The aims of this study were to 1) describe the MTX withdrawal strategies used for well-controlled JIA in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) registry, 2) compare time to flare among different MTX withdrawal strategies, and 3) evaluate the duration of disease remission after MTX withdrawal.

Methods: The study population consisted of patients enrolled in the CARRA Registry with a diagnosis of non-systemic JIA on MTX monotherapy for at least 12 months and with 2 consecutive registry visits with no reported disease activity (based on joint count = 0 and no changes in medication). Subjects with systemic JIA, non-JIA rheumatic diseases or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. Subjects were divided into 3 cohorts: 1) MTX continuation, 2) MTX tapering, or 3) MTX discontinuation without taper. Rates of flare (new or increased JIA medication, > 0 joint count) were compared among groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression, adjusted for demographic, disease, and medication history covariates. Rates of remission were also compared between subjects who stopped MTX without taper and subjects who tapered MTX, using descriptive statistics.

Results: Of 9835 persons in the CARRA Registry, 377 fulfilled the study criteria. MTX monotherapy was continued in 233 (61.8%), tapered in 90 (23.9%) and stopped in 54 (14.3%). Of MTX continuers, 25 (10.7%) were subsequently observed to withdraw MTX (2 tapered, 23 stopped). Subject characteristics (Table 1) did not differ significantly among the groups. Most subjects (85%) had oligoarthritis or RF – polyarthritis, consistent with overall JIA enrollment distribution. Prior TNF inhibitor use was less common among those who tapered, while prior flares were less commonly recorded among those who stopped MTX without taper. No association was found between flare of JIA and MTX withdrawal strategy in unadjusted analyses (Figure) or adjusted models (taper vs. continuation: 0.89, 95% CI 0.59-1.34; discontinuation vs. continuation: 0.90, 95% CI 0.54-1.48). Rates of sustained remission and median time in remission were modestly higher among those who tapered MTX compared to those who stopped MTX (Table 2). Among those who were in sustained remission after tapering MTX, rates of remission were higher before tapering than afterwards (Table 2).

Conclusion: Within the CARRA Registry, we did not observe significant differences in time to flare between subjects with non-systemic JIA who continued MTX and those who tapered or stopped MTX. This may reflect bias from residual confounding. Rates of sustained remission were modestly higher during times of MTX tapering compared to times after discontinuation.

Table 1: Selected subject characteristics in the three MTX withdrawal cohorts

Table 2: JIA remission rates after MTX withdrawal

Figure: Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing risk of flare based on MTX withdrawal strategy


Disclosures: M. Twilt, None; K. Baszis, None; S. Ringold, UpToDate, 9, CARRA, 4, 5, BMS, 12, co-PI on PCORI funded study for which BMS is supplying abatacept; T. Beukelman, UCB, 2, Novartis, 2; A. Dennos, None; P. Shrader, None; D. Horton, Danisco USA Inc., 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Twilt M, Baszis K, Ringold S, Beukelman T, Dennos A, Shrader P, Horton D. Methotrexate Withdrawal and Outcomes in Participants with Well-controlled Non-systemic JIA Within the CARRA Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/methotrexate-withdrawal-and-outcomes-in-participants-with-well-controlled-non-systemic-jia-within-the-carra-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/methotrexate-withdrawal-and-outcomes-in-participants-with-well-controlled-non-systemic-jia-within-the-carra-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology