ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 036

Medication Related Decision-Making in Parents of Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Alexandra Munroe1, Adam Huber 2, Bianca Lang 3, Suzanne Ramsey 4 and Elizabeth Stringer 4, 1Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 2IWK Health Centre & Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 3Dalhousie University - Halifax, Halifax, Canada, 4IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Canada

Meeting: 2020 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

Keywords: Biologic agents, Decision analysis, DMARDs, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), parents

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

The 2020 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium, originally scheduled for April 29 – May 2, was postponed due to COVID-19; therefore, abstracts were not presented as scheduled.

Date: Friday, May 1, 2020

Title: Poster Breakout 6 – Patient Experience & Care Optimization

Session Type: Poster Breakout Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-5:00PM

Background/Purpose: Outcomes for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have improved with use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics. Despite this, the decision by a parent to begin these medications in their child can be distressing for a variety of reasons. This study sought to gain insight into the experience of parents making treatment decisions for their children. We explored: (1) the barriers and facilitators parents face when making this decision, (2) the perceived involvement and preferences around shared decision making (SDM), and (3) the perceptions around the supports in place or needed to help make this decision

Methods: In this qualitative study we recruited English speaking parents of a child with JIA followed in a tertiary care pediatric rheumatology clinic who had started treatment with a DMARD or biologic for the first time. To be eligible, the child had to be on the medication for at least 3 months to allow for some reflection on the experience. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to include broad questions around decision-making. From the list of 26 questions, we created six main interview guide topics (Table 1). Telephone interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for analysis in NVivo11. Semantic thematic analysis included review of all transcripts, generation of initial codes through open coding, and creation of a code book. Dependability was achieved by having a second reader review transcripts, codes, and themes for representativeness. Themes were then derived to represent important concepts about participants’ experiences in relation to the study objectives.

Results: 20 parents (19F:1M) participated, median age 39 (26-56); median age of child 8 (4-17) (15F:4M). 11 interviews focused on a DMARD, 9 on a biologic. There were six perceived barriers (Table 2). The main barriers faced by parents were the feelings of general fear, fear about side effects, catastrophic thinking, feeling like there is no acceptable option, not having enough information, and desiring additional support. There were six perceived facilitators (Table 3) to making the decision. These included the child’s poor quality of life related to JIA, being aware of a step-wise treatment plan, understanding medication options, trusting and feeling supported by the physician, having time to with the information before deciding, having a positive response to treatment, and self-directed internet research. 75% or more of parents were content with the degree of SDM, had enough knowledge to make the decision, felt confident in making the decision, and felt adequately supported by the rheumatologist.

Conclusion: We have gained insight into the challenging experience of parents making treatment decisions for their children. Overall, we found parents to be satisfied with the decision-making process and they appeared to feel well supported by the rheumatologist and rheumatology team. However, the negative emotional impact on parents was profound and there were informational and support needs identified by some parents. This will inform the development of interventions aimed at supporting parents at this difficult time to improve the overall care for patients and families.

Table 1. Semi_structured interview guide topics

Table 2. Barriers to making medication decisions

Table 3. Facilitators to making a medication decision


Disclosure: A. Munroe, None; A. Huber, None; B. Lang, None; S. Ramsey, None; E. Stringer, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Munroe A, Huber A, Lang B, Ramsey S, Stringer E. Medication Related Decision-Making in Parents of Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 4). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/medication-related-decision-making-in-parents-of-children-with-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2020 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/medication-related-decision-making-in-parents-of-children-with-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology