ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1424

Mapping Central Nervous System Responses To Painful Stimuli In Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis

Mohamad Bittar1, Yvonne Lee2, Atul Deodhar3, Jennifer Barton4 and Alexander Stevens1, 1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 2Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 3Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 4VA Portland Health Care System/OHSU, Portland, OR

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Neuroimaging, pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1405–1433) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Chronic pain is one of the common causes of disability in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The mechanism behind this pain is not well understood, hindering the development of safe and efficacious treatments. The aim of this exploratory study is to examine differences in brain responses to painful stimuli between axSpA patients and healthy controls (HC).

Methods: Six axSpA patients and 6 age-and-sex matched HC underwent functional brain magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while tactile pressure to the thumbnail was applied: a light pressure (LSTIM) that is perceived but not painful, and a hard pressure (HSTIM) rated as a 1 pain, on a scale of 0-10 (Fig 1). A visual cue appeared 1.4 – 4.2 seconds prior to the stimulus, indicating a light or hard level of the subsequent stimulus. Analysis of fMRI data was exploratory due to small sample size. AxSpA and HC groups were combined to maximize power to detect signal changes associated with the pressure task. Areas with increased signal were used to create regions of interest (ROIs), which were then analyzed for group effects, using repeated measures mixed effects models.

Results: AxSpA patients were 50% females, had a mean age of 40 and mean ASDAS-CRP score of 2.7. The visual cue conditions produced increased signal throughout the brain, including areas in the occipitotemporal pathway, anterior insula, frontal operculum, medial superior frontal gyrus, and parietofrontal (PF) complex. Signal decreases were seen in areas typically associated with the default mode network (DMN). The tactile stimulation produced increased signal throughout the insula bilaterally, somatomotor areas along the central sulcus, fusiform gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, and the area at the PF junction (Fig 2). Decreased activity was seen in occipitotemporal areas, occipitoparietal areas, frontal pole, and precentral sulcus, bilaterally.When comparing axSpA vs HC responses to LSTIM and HSTIM (within and between groups), there were statistically significant differences in 3 ROIs: the fusiform gyrus, the PF junction, and the frontal pole (Fig 3). At the level of the fusiform gyrus (involved in visual processing and pain anticipation), axSpA patients had a decreased signal over time in response to HSTIM compared to LSTIM, while the opposite was seen in HC. The PF junction, which is part of the salience network (SN), is involved in cognitive functions and pain processing. AxSpA patients had more pronounced response with HSTIM compared to LSTIM at the level of the PF complex compared with no difference in stimulus response in HC. The frontal pole, including the anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex, and part of the DMN, is involved in cognitive functions and modulating chronic pain. In the axSpA group, there was an increased signal over time in response to HSTIM compared to LSTIM; this signal was decreased in HC.

Conclusion: In this proof-of-concept exploratory study, patients with active axSpA had altered brain response to painful stimuli at regions encompassing SN and DMN, which have been previously implicated in chronic pain conditions. Further studies are planned to characterize central nervous system dysregulation and its role in chronic pain in larger cohorts of axSpA patients.

Supporting image 1Fig. 1. Illustration of the fMRI tactile pressure task. The painful and light trials differ only in the stimulus cues (&,#) and the stimulus pressure. The crosshair is present during the variable inter-trial interval. The post-cue interval (1.4 – 4.2s) is jittered to permit deconvolution of the cue and stimulus hemodynamic responses.

Supporting image 2Fig. 2: Combined whole-brain analysis showing hyperactive (red) and hypoactive (blue) regions of interest (ROIs) following pressure stimulus. Numbers indicate ROIs with significant effects shown in Fig. 3.

Supporting image 3Fig. 3. Signal response achieving statistical significance (p < 0.05) of ROIs to LSTIM (blue) and HSTIM (yellow) in axSpA and HC. ROI: region of interest. LSTIM: light pressure. HSTIM: hard painful pressure. axSpA: axial spondyloarthritis. HC: healthy control.


Disclosures: M. Bittar: None; Y. Lee: CVS Health, 12,, GE Healthcare, 12,, Tonix, 1; A. Deodhar: BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, J&J, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; J. Barton: None; A. Stevens: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bittar M, Lee Y, Deodhar A, Barton J, Stevens A. Mapping Central Nervous System Responses To Painful Stimuli In Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mapping-central-nervous-system-responses-to-painful-stimuli-in-patients-with-axial-spondyloarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mapping-central-nervous-system-responses-to-painful-stimuli-in-patients-with-axial-spondyloarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology