ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2026
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Abstract Number: 1122

Lymphocyte Immunophenotypes at Randomization on the Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation Trial: Comparison of Treatment Naïve and DMARD Treated Participants with Healthy Controls

Ankoor Shah1, Jan Storek2, Rob Woolson3, Lynette Keyes-Elstein4, Paul Wallace5, Maureen D. Mayes6, Leslie Crofford7, Daniel E. Furst8, Ellen Goldmuntz9, Richard Nash10, Peter McSweeney10 and Keith Sullivan11, 1Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 2University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 3Rho Inc, Chapel Hill, NC, 4Clinical Statistics, Rho Federal Systems, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC, 5Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, 6Rheumatology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, 7Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 8Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 9NIH, Bethesda, MD, 10Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Denver, CO, 11Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Keywords: Hematopoietic stem cells, lymphocytes and systemic sclerosis, T-Regulatory Cells

Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Systemic Sclerosis and Related Disorders – Basic Science Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The Scleroderma:Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation Trial (SCOT) study compared stem cell transplant to monthly cyclophosphamide (CYC) in patients with scleroderma (SSc). We studied baseline lymphocyte subsets comparing age and gender matched controls with SCOT participants who were previously treated in the prior 12 months and those who received no treatment during this period.

Methods: Lymphocytes from 123 controls and 72 SCOT participants at baseline were analyzed by flow cytometry. For each lymphocyte subset count, the significance of difference was determined using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results: Compared to controls, those with SSc showed significant reductions in central memory CD8 T cells, memory B cells, myeloid and plamacytoid dendritic cells, and in FOXP3+CD25+ T regulatory (Treg) cells (Table 1). Conversely, participants had increases in naïve CD4 cells and effector CD8 T cells. No significant differences in any lymphocyte subset were observed between those previously treated (n=57) and untreated (n=15). Additionally, no differences were observed between participants previously treated with CYC (n=23) and those that were not (n=49) All participants had an increased Th2/Th1 CD4 cell ratio compared to controls.

Conclusion: We found a number of differences between healthy controls and participants in terms of T cell subsets (including Tregs) and B cells attesting to the profound immune dysregulation in severe early diffuse SSc. Increased numbers of induced Th2 CD4 T cells supports the theory that Th2 (rather than Th1) cell play a role in the pathogenesis. Furthermore, the decreased numbers of Tregs may transformation to pathogenic effector T cells of Th17 or Th2 lineages with respective pro-inflammatory or pro-fibrotic activity. The role of memory B cells is unclear, although reduced numbers may represent trafficking to sites of inflammation or disease activity. The counts of abnormal cell subsets were similar in the treated and untreated patients suggesting that even in the treated patients the subset counts were abnormal primarily due to scleroderma itself rather than immune modulatory treatment. Even treatment with cyclophosphamide resulted in a baseline lymphocyte profile that was not significantly different from those patients treated with other agents In other words, our data suggests severe disease was more influential than drug immunosuppression in producing the immunophenotype abnormalities. The hypothesis that correction of lymphocyte aberration will affect clinical disease progression needs to be studied in a prospective trial.

.

 

Table 1: Lymphocyte subset counts (per microliter of blood) in patients with SSc and healthy controls.

 

Lymphocyte subset

Healthy Controls

(n=123) Median (10th-90th percentile)

Untreated Patients

(n=15) Median (10th-90th percentile)

Treated Patients

(n=57) Median (10th-90th percentile)

Treated vs. untreated patients (p-value)

Healthy controls vs. all SSc patients (p-value)

T cells

1447 (799-2247)

1181 (719-2504)

1226 (452-2386)

Not signif.

Not signif

CD4 T cells

935 (503-1544

731 (444-1924)

843 (334-1806)

Not signif.

Not signif.

CD8 T cells

395 (199-735)

347 (232-556)

247 (99-721)

Not signif.

<0.001

Naïve CD4 T cells

88 (26-273)

231 (38-375)

173 (24-467)

Not signif.

<0.001

Central memory CD4 T cells

376 (199-683)

227 (66-717)

252 (82-518)

Not signif.

<0.001

Effector memory CD4 Cells

16 (6-42)

31 (4-94)

20 (9-91)

Not signif.

0.003

Naïve CD8 T cells

35 (7-119)

81 (6-127)

27 (4-119)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Central memory CD8 T cells

108 (49-246)

13 (4-49)

15 (2-70)

Not signif.

<0.001

Effector memory CD8 T Cells

12 (2-42)

19 (4-44)

8 (1-119)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Effector CD8 T cells

5 (1-19)

29 (9-106)

24 (6-90)

Not signif.

<0.001

Activated T cells

99 (40-256)

57 (13-402)

25 (6-259)

Not signif.

<0.001

Activated CD4 T cells

53 (20-138)

16 (4-296)

9 (2-139)

Not signif.

<0.001

Recent Thymic CD4 emigrants

63 (21-181)

114 (19-208)

84 (10-191)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Gamma/delta T cells

39 (13-97)

41 (4-94)

20 (5-63)

Not signif.

<0.001

Induced Th1 CD4 T cells

205 (64-543)

269 (24-1071)

217 (28-568)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Induced Th2 CD4 T cells

13 (2-49)

31 (0-131)

36 (6-95)

Not signif.

<0.001

Th2/Th1 CD4 cells ratio

0.051 (0.018-0.150)

0.146 (0.000-0.209)

0.153 (0.035 – 0.746)

Not signif.

<0.001

Induced Th1 CD8 T cells

249 (79 -585)

268 (22-633)

182 (47-702)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Induced Th2 CD8 T cells

2 (1-13)

4 (0-10)

4 (1-25)

Not signif.

0.012

Th2/Th1 CD8 cells ratio

0.010 (0.002-0.056)

0.015 (0.000-0.108)

0.021 (0.004-0.254)

Not signif.

<0.001

NK cells

176 (76-404)

205 (104-326)

198 (91-355)

Not signif.

Not signif.

B cells

197 (87-449)

208 (84-320)

159 (39-458)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Naïve B cells

151 (62-351)

183 (54-291)

141 (33-425)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Non-switched memory B cells

13 (5-29)

7 (1-18)

6 (1-22)

Not signif.

<0.001

Switched memory B cells

25 (9-57)

10 (4-17)

5 (2-22)

Not signif.

<0.001

Myeloid DCs/precursors

43 (24-88)

17 (9-70)

19 (8-42)

Not signif.

<0.001

Plasmacytoid DCs/precursors

5 (2-9)

2 (0-6)

3 (0-9)

Not signif.

<0.001

CD3+CD4+CD25+Fox P3+

37 (7-134)

4 (0-13)

2 (0-17)

Not signif.

<0.001

CD3+CD4+CD25+Fox P3+CD127-

34 (6-125)

4 (0-10)

2 (0-15)

Not signif.

<0.001

 


Disclosure: A. Shah, Boeringher-ingleheim, 2,Reata, 2,Cytori, 2; J. Storek, None; R. Woolson, None; L. Keyes-Elstein, None; P. Wallace, None; M. D. Mayes, Bayer, 2,Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 6,Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 2,Reata, 2,Sanofi, 2,Astellas, 6,Galapagos, 6,Mitsubishi-Tanabe, 6,Medtelligence, 5; L. Crofford, None; D. E. Furst, None; E. Goldmuntz, None; R. Nash, None; P. McSweeney, None; K. Sullivan, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Shah A, Storek J, Woolson R, Keyes-Elstein L, Wallace P, Mayes MD, Crofford L, Furst DE, Goldmuntz E, Nash R, McSweeney P, Sullivan K. Lymphocyte Immunophenotypes at Randomization on the Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation Trial: Comparison of Treatment Naïve and DMARD Treated Participants with Healthy Controls [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lymphocyte-immunophenotypes-at-randomization-on-the-scleroderma-cyclophosphamide-or-transplantation-trial-comparison-of-treatment-naive-and-dmard-treated-participants-with-healthy-controls/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lymphocyte-immunophenotypes-at-randomization-on-the-scleroderma-cyclophosphamide-or-transplantation-trial-comparison-of-treatment-naive-and-dmard-treated-participants-with-healthy-controls/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology