ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1122

Lymphocyte Immunophenotypes at Randomization on the Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation Trial: Comparison of Treatment Naïve and DMARD Treated Participants with Healthy Controls

Ankoor Shah1, Jan Storek2, Rob Woolson3, Lynette Keyes-Elstein4, Paul Wallace5, Maureen D. Mayes6, Leslie Crofford7, Daniel E. Furst8, Ellen Goldmuntz9, Richard Nash10, Peter McSweeney10 and Keith Sullivan11, 1Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 2University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 3Rho Inc, Chapel Hill, NC, 4Clinical Statistics, Rho Federal Systems, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC, 5Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, 6Rheumatology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, 7Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 8Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 9NIH, Bethesda, MD, 10Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Denver, CO, 11Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Hematopoietic stem cells, lymphocytes and systemic sclerosis, T-Regulatory Cells

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Systemic Sclerosis and Related Disorders – Basic Science Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The Scleroderma:Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation Trial (SCOT) study compared stem cell transplant to monthly cyclophosphamide (CYC) in patients with scleroderma (SSc). We studied baseline lymphocyte subsets comparing age and gender matched controls with SCOT participants who were previously treated in the prior 12 months and those who received no treatment during this period.

Methods: Lymphocytes from 123 controls and 72 SCOT participants at baseline were analyzed by flow cytometry. For each lymphocyte subset count, the significance of difference was determined using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results: Compared to controls, those with SSc showed significant reductions in central memory CD8 T cells, memory B cells, myeloid and plamacytoid dendritic cells, and in FOXP3+CD25+ T regulatory (Treg) cells (Table 1). Conversely, participants had increases in naïve CD4 cells and effector CD8 T cells. No significant differences in any lymphocyte subset were observed between those previously treated (n=57) and untreated (n=15). Additionally, no differences were observed between participants previously treated with CYC (n=23) and those that were not (n=49) All participants had an increased Th2/Th1 CD4 cell ratio compared to controls.

Conclusion: We found a number of differences between healthy controls and participants in terms of T cell subsets (including Tregs) and B cells attesting to the profound immune dysregulation in severe early diffuse SSc. Increased numbers of induced Th2 CD4 T cells supports the theory that Th2 (rather than Th1) cell play a role in the pathogenesis. Furthermore, the decreased numbers of Tregs may transformation to pathogenic effector T cells of Th17 or Th2 lineages with respective pro-inflammatory or pro-fibrotic activity. The role of memory B cells is unclear, although reduced numbers may represent trafficking to sites of inflammation or disease activity. The counts of abnormal cell subsets were similar in the treated and untreated patients suggesting that even in the treated patients the subset counts were abnormal primarily due to scleroderma itself rather than immune modulatory treatment. Even treatment with cyclophosphamide resulted in a baseline lymphocyte profile that was not significantly different from those patients treated with other agents In other words, our data suggests severe disease was more influential than drug immunosuppression in producing the immunophenotype abnormalities. The hypothesis that correction of lymphocyte aberration will affect clinical disease progression needs to be studied in a prospective trial.

.

 

Table 1: Lymphocyte subset counts (per microliter of blood) in patients with SSc and healthy controls.

 

Lymphocyte subset

Healthy Controls

(n=123) Median (10th-90th percentile)

Untreated Patients

(n=15) Median (10th-90th percentile)

Treated Patients

(n=57) Median (10th-90th percentile)

Treated vs. untreated patients (p-value)

Healthy controls vs. all SSc patients (p-value)

T cells

1447 (799-2247)

1181 (719-2504)

1226 (452-2386)

Not signif.

Not signif

CD4 T cells

935 (503-1544

731 (444-1924)

843 (334-1806)

Not signif.

Not signif.

CD8 T cells

395 (199-735)

347 (232-556)

247 (99-721)

Not signif.

<0.001

Naïve CD4 T cells

88 (26-273)

231 (38-375)

173 (24-467)

Not signif.

<0.001

Central memory CD4 T cells

376 (199-683)

227 (66-717)

252 (82-518)

Not signif.

<0.001

Effector memory CD4 Cells

16 (6-42)

31 (4-94)

20 (9-91)

Not signif.

0.003

Naïve CD8 T cells

35 (7-119)

81 (6-127)

27 (4-119)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Central memory CD8 T cells

108 (49-246)

13 (4-49)

15 (2-70)

Not signif.

<0.001

Effector memory CD8 T Cells

12 (2-42)

19 (4-44)

8 (1-119)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Effector CD8 T cells

5 (1-19)

29 (9-106)

24 (6-90)

Not signif.

<0.001

Activated T cells

99 (40-256)

57 (13-402)

25 (6-259)

Not signif.

<0.001

Activated CD4 T cells

53 (20-138)

16 (4-296)

9 (2-139)

Not signif.

<0.001

Recent Thymic CD4 emigrants

63 (21-181)

114 (19-208)

84 (10-191)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Gamma/delta T cells

39 (13-97)

41 (4-94)

20 (5-63)

Not signif.

<0.001

Induced Th1 CD4 T cells

205 (64-543)

269 (24-1071)

217 (28-568)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Induced Th2 CD4 T cells

13 (2-49)

31 (0-131)

36 (6-95)

Not signif.

<0.001

Th2/Th1 CD4 cells ratio

0.051 (0.018-0.150)

0.146 (0.000-0.209)

0.153 (0.035 – 0.746)

Not signif.

<0.001

Induced Th1 CD8 T cells

249 (79 -585)

268 (22-633)

182 (47-702)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Induced Th2 CD8 T cells

2 (1-13)

4 (0-10)

4 (1-25)

Not signif.

0.012

Th2/Th1 CD8 cells ratio

0.010 (0.002-0.056)

0.015 (0.000-0.108)

0.021 (0.004-0.254)

Not signif.

<0.001

NK cells

176 (76-404)

205 (104-326)

198 (91-355)

Not signif.

Not signif.

B cells

197 (87-449)

208 (84-320)

159 (39-458)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Naïve B cells

151 (62-351)

183 (54-291)

141 (33-425)

Not signif.

Not signif.

Non-switched memory B cells

13 (5-29)

7 (1-18)

6 (1-22)

Not signif.

<0.001

Switched memory B cells

25 (9-57)

10 (4-17)

5 (2-22)

Not signif.

<0.001

Myeloid DCs/precursors

43 (24-88)

17 (9-70)

19 (8-42)

Not signif.

<0.001

Plasmacytoid DCs/precursors

5 (2-9)

2 (0-6)

3 (0-9)

Not signif.

<0.001

CD3+CD4+CD25+Fox P3+

37 (7-134)

4 (0-13)

2 (0-17)

Not signif.

<0.001

CD3+CD4+CD25+Fox P3+CD127-

34 (6-125)

4 (0-10)

2 (0-15)

Not signif.

<0.001

 


Disclosure: A. Shah, Boeringher-ingleheim, 2,Reata, 2,Cytori, 2; J. Storek, None; R. Woolson, None; L. Keyes-Elstein, None; P. Wallace, None; M. D. Mayes, Bayer, 2,Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 6,Corbus Pharmaceuticals, 2,Reata, 2,Sanofi, 2,Astellas, 6,Galapagos, 6,Mitsubishi-Tanabe, 6,Medtelligence, 5; L. Crofford, None; D. E. Furst, None; E. Goldmuntz, None; R. Nash, None; P. McSweeney, None; K. Sullivan, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Shah A, Storek J, Woolson R, Keyes-Elstein L, Wallace P, Mayes MD, Crofford L, Furst DE, Goldmuntz E, Nash R, McSweeney P, Sullivan K. Lymphocyte Immunophenotypes at Randomization on the Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation Trial: Comparison of Treatment Naïve and DMARD Treated Participants with Healthy Controls [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lymphocyte-immunophenotypes-at-randomization-on-the-scleroderma-cyclophosphamide-or-transplantation-trial-comparison-of-treatment-naive-and-dmard-treated-participants-with-healthy-controls/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lymphocyte-immunophenotypes-at-randomization-on-the-scleroderma-cyclophosphamide-or-transplantation-trial-comparison-of-treatment-naive-and-dmard-treated-participants-with-healthy-controls/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology