ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0853

Lung Ultrasound in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Sclerosis: Accuracy of B-line and Pleural Assessment

Jesús Loarce1, Ana García de Vicente1, Javier Arechavala Hita1, Carlos de La Puente Bujidos1, Juan Rigual1, Francisco Javier Bachiller Corral2 and Mónica Vázquez Díaz1, 1Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: interstitial lung disease, rheumatoid arthritis, Systemic sclerosis, Ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Abstracts: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-4:30PM

Background/Purpose: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent and severe complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although computerized tomography (CT) is considered the gold-standard for diagnosis, lung ultrasound (LUS) has recently emerged as a diagnostic technique in the assessment of ILD. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the usefulness of LUS in the assessment of ILD in patients with RA and SSc.

Methods: A single-center, cross-sectional study was performed in patients with RA and SSc who had an indication for chest CT as a screening, diagnostic or follow-up technique for ILD. A lung CT and LUS were performed on the same day. LUS was performed with a 6-10 mHz linear probe. Two LUS were performed, in the first one the B-lines were counted in the 14 spaces defined by Gutierrez et al, and in the second one the pleura was evaluated according to the criteria of Fairchaild et al. In addition, maximal pleural thickness was measured in the subscapular spaces. Pulmonary function tests (PFT) were performed in the 2 months adjacent to the CT scan. Two-sample comparisons were performed using a t-test or Mann–Whitney U test. Parametric Pearson or non-parametric Spearman correlation coefficient analyses were used to test the correlation between parameters, as appropriate. Area under the curve (AUC),sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the LUS scores.

Results: Eighty patients were enrolled, 49 patients with RA and 31 with SSc (Table 1). A total of 53 patients (66.3%) had ILD according to CT. The mean time to perform lung ultrasound for the B-line and the pleural assessment was 09:15 and 07:45 minutes, respectively.

There was a significant correlation between the presence of ILD with the B-line score (p< 0.001) and pleural score (p< 0.001). There was also a significant correlation between pleural thickness at lung bases and the presence of ILD (2.41 mm vs 0.91 mm, p< 0.001).

There was a moderate correlation between B-line count with FVC (-0.42, p< 0.001) and DLCO (-0.43, p< 0.001). The pleural score had a low correlation with FVC (-0.27, p=0.016) and moderate correlation with DLCO (-0.49, p< 0.001). The AUC for B lines was 0.926 (Figure 1). The optimal cutoff point for the diagnosis of ILD was > 10 B lines, with a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.89. The AUC for pleural alterations was 0.933 (Figure 1). The optimal cutoff point was > 2 pathologic pleural spaces, with a sensitivity of 0.91 and a specificity of 0.81.

There was a significant association between the presence of honeycombing on chest CT at bases and maximum pleural thickness measured by ultrasound, being statistically significant in the right base (4.29 mm vs. 1.64 mm, p< 0.001), although it did not reach statistical significance in the left base (3.27 mm vs. 1.54mm, p=0.16).

The CT scans of patients with false positive results by LUS were reviewed, finding CT alterations that justified the findings (table 2).

Conclusion: LUS seems to be a useful technique in the diagnosis of ILD in RA and SSc, presenting good sensitivity and specificity, as well as a moderate correlation with the PFT. Pleural assessment is less time consuming and have a higher diagnostic yield compared to B-line counting.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. ROC curve of B-line score and pleural score.

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: J. Loarce: None; A. García de Vicente: None; J. Arechavala Hita: None; C. de La Puente Bujidos: None; J. Rigual: None; F. Bachiller Corral: None; M. Vázquez Díaz: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Loarce J, García de Vicente A, Arechavala Hita J, de La Puente Bujidos C, Rigual J, Bachiller Corral F, Vázquez Díaz M. Lung Ultrasound in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Sclerosis: Accuracy of B-line and Pleural Assessment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lung-ultrasound-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-systemic-sclerosis-accuracy-of-b-line-and-pleural-assessment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lung-ultrasound-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-systemic-sclerosis-accuracy-of-b-line-and-pleural-assessment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology