ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2113

Lesinurad, a Novel Selective Uric Acid Reabsorption Inhibitor, in Combination with Febuxostat, in Patients with Tophaceous Gout

Nicola Dalbeth1, Graeme Jones2, Robert Terkeltaub3, Dinesh Khanna4, Jeff Kopicko5, Nihar Bhakta5, Maple Fung5, Chris Storgard6, Scott Baumgartner5 and Fernando Perez-Ruiz7, 1Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2Musculoskeletal Unit, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, 3Medicine-Rheumatology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 4Div of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 5Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, 64939 Directors Place, Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, 7Servicio de Reumatologia, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Febuxostat, gout, hyperuricemia, tophaceous gout and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies I: Therapeutics

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Lesinurad (LESU; RDEA594)
is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor (SURI) being investigated for
the treatment of gout in combination with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor. The CRYSTAL study is a
multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III clinical
trial of LESU in combination with febuxostat (FBX) to determine efficacy and
safety of combination therapy compared with FBX monotherapy in patients with
tophaceous gout (NCT01510769).

Methods: Patients with gout, aged 18–85 yrs, with serum
uric acid (sUA) ≥8 mg/dL (≥6 mg/dL on urate lowering therapy) and
≥1 tophus were given FBX 80 mg qd for 3 weeks before randomization to
LESU (200 mg or 400 mg oral, qd) in combination with FBX or placebo (PBO) +
FBX. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients with sUA <5.0 mg/dL by
Month 6. Secondary endpoints included proportion of patients with complete
resolution of ≥1 tophus and percent reduction in tophus area by Month 12.
Safety assessments included adverse events and laboratory data.

Results: Patients (N=324) were white (79.9%) and male
(95.4%) with mean±SD age of 54.1±11.0 yrs and 14.7±10.9 yrs since gout
diagnosis. sUA was 8.7±1.6 mg/dL at screening and 5.3±1.6 mg/dL on FBX at
randomization (28% with sUA ≥6 mg/dL). More patients achieved sUA levels
<6, <5 (primary endpoint), <4, and <3 mg/dL with LESU+FBX (Figure).
Percentage of patients with complete resolution of ≥1 tophus by Month 12 was
21.1%, 25.5%, and 30.3% for FBX+PBO, FBX+LESU200, and FBX+LESU400,
respectively. Percent decrease in tophus area by Month 12 was 55.8% and 57.9%
for FBX+LESU200 and FBX+LESU400, respectively, vs 31.3% for FBX + PBO (both nominal
P<0.05). Safety data are reported in the Table. More serum creatinine
(sCr) increases were observed with LESU+FBX; most resolved by last study visit
(Table). Kidney stones were lower with LESU.

Conclusion: In patients with tophaceous
gout, LESU (200 or 400 mg) in combination with FBX increased the proportion of
patients achieving sUA <5 mg/dL at 6 months compared with FBX alone. LESU in
combination with FBX resulted in greater tophus area resolution compared with
FBX alone, as well as a dose-ordered numerical increase in the proportion of
subjects having complete tophi resolution. LESU was generally well tolerated,
except for higher incidence of predominately reversible sCr elevations.
Combination therapy with LESU+FBX may represent a future treatment option for
patients with tophaceous gout on FBX who warrant additional therapy.

 

 

PBO + FBX

N=109

LESU200 + FBX

N=106

LESU400 + FBX

N=109

Patients experiencing  any TEAE

79 (72.5%)

87 (82.1%)

90 (82.6%)

Patients with serious TEAEs

10 (9.2%)

6 (5.7%)

9 (8.3%)

Patients with any renal-related AEs

6 (5.5%)

9 (8.5%)

11 (10.1%)

Patients with serious renal-related AEs

1 (0.9%)

0 (0%)

2 (1.8%)

Patients with kidney stones

4 (3.7%)

1 (0.9%)

2 (1.8%)

Patients with ≥2.0x increase in sCr

Number (%) sCr elevations resolved by last study visit

0 (0%)

–

3 (2.8%)

2/3 (67%)

6 (5.5%)

6/7 (86%)

Data are n (%).

 


Disclosure: N. Dalbeth, AstraZeneca, 2,Fonterra, 2,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2,Savient, 8,Menarini, 8,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 8,Takeda, 8,AstraZeneca, 9,Fonterra, 9,Pfizer Inc, 9,Takeda, 9,Metabolex, 9; G. Jones, Abbvie, 2,Ardea BioSciences, 2,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2,Auxilium, 2,Pfizer Inc, 9,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 9,Hospira, 9,Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 9,UCB, 8,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 8,Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 8,Abbvie, 8,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 8,Mundipharma, 8,Amgen, 8,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 8,Pfizer Inc, 8; R. Terkeltaub, ARDEA/AstraZeneca, Takeda, Revive, Relburn, UCB, 5; D. Khanna, AstraZeneca, 2,AstraZeneca, 5,Takeda, 5; J. Kopicko, Ardea Biosciences, 3; N. Bhakta, Ardea Biosciences, 3; M. Fung, Ardea Biosciences, 3; C. Storgard, Ardea Biosciences, 3; S. Baumgartner, Ardea Biosciences, 3; F. Perez-Ruiz, AstraZeneca, 8,Menarini, 5,AstraZeneca, 6,Menarini, 8,Cimabay, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dalbeth N, Jones G, Terkeltaub R, Khanna D, Kopicko J, Bhakta N, Fung M, Storgard C, Baumgartner S, Perez-Ruiz F. Lesinurad, a Novel Selective Uric Acid Reabsorption Inhibitor, in Combination with Febuxostat, in Patients with Tophaceous Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lesinurad-a-novel-selective-uric-acid-reabsorption-inhibitor-in-combination-with-febuxostat-in-patients-with-tophaceous-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lesinurad-a-novel-selective-uric-acid-reabsorption-inhibitor-in-combination-with-febuxostat-in-patients-with-tophaceous-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology