ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1521

Ixekizumab Is Effective in the Treatment of Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Regardless of the Level of C-Reactive Protein or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scores

Walter P. Maksymowych1, Gaia Gallo 2, Rebecca Bolce 3, Fangyi Zhao 2, Vladimir Geneus 3, Mikkel Østergaard 4, Kurisu Tada 5, Atul Deodhar 6 and Lianne Gensler 7, 1University of Alberta/CARE ARTHRITIS, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, 4Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 6Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 7University San Francisco California, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukins (IL), Inflammation, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: IL-17 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA). Elevated CRP levels in serum predict response to TNF inhibitors (TNFi).1-4 The role of baseline spine MRI as a predictor of response has not been investigated for IL-17 inhibitors. This study evaluates response rates at week (wk) 16 with ixekizumab (IXE), an IL-17A antagonist, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS)/r-axSpA and elevated or normal/low inflammation as measured by CRP or spinal MRI.

Methods: Two Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trials (COAST-V, NCT02696785; COAST-W, NCT02696798) enrolled biologic-naive or TNFi-experienced patients, respectively, with active disease (BASDI ≥4 and spinal pain ≥4 on a numeric rating scale) and an established diagnosis of r-axSpA and fulfilling Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria (sacroiliitis on radiograph by modified New York [mNY] criteria and ≥1 spondyloarthritis feature). All patients fulfilling ASAS criteria also fulfilled mNY criteria for AS. Patients were treated with IXE (80 mg every 2 or 4 wks [Q2W, Q4W]) or PBO; adalimumab (40 mg Q2W) was an active reference arm in COAST-V. We examined ASAS 40% (ASAS40) response rates at wk 16 for the intent-to-treat population by baseline CRP (≤5 or >5 mg/L) and/or MRI spine inflammation (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] spine score < 2 or ≥2). Baseline spine MRI (scored by central readers) was available in 96% of patients in COAST-V and 51% in COAST-W. Higher scores reflect greater baseline disease activity. Missing data for ASAS40 were imputed by nonresponder imputation.

Results: In the COAST-V/W integrated dataset that combined biologic-naive and TNFi-experienced populations, significantly more patients treated with IXE achieved ASAS40 response at wk 16 than with PBO in the baseline CRP elevated ( >5 mg/L) group (39.3%, 42.5%, and 16.7% for IXE Q4W, IXE Q2W, and PBO, respectively; p< .001 for IXE Q4W, IXE Q2W vs PBO) and in the baseline CRP normal (≤5 mg/L) group (27.4%, 35.2%, and 12.3% for IXE Q4W, IXE Q2W, and PBO, respectively; p< .05 for IXE Q4W, p< .01 for IXE Q2W vs PBO, Fig 1), and the magnitude of response with IXE between elevated vs normal CRP groups was not statistically significant. Notably, a significantly higher proportion of patients achieved ASAS40 at wk 16 with IXE than with PBO, regardless of whether MRI spine SPARCC scores were < 2 (40%, 51.7%, and 15.5% for IXE Q4W, IXE Q2W, and PBO, respectively; p< .01 for IXE Q4W, p< .001 for IXE Q2W vs PBO) or ≥2 (44.3%, 46.6%, and 18.7% for IXE Q4W, IXE Q2W, and PBO, respectively; p< .001 for IXE Q4W, IXE Q2W vs PBO, Fig 1). Among the patients (n=79) with MRI spine SPARCC score < 2 and CRP ≤5 mg/L, the ASAS40 responses at wk 16 were 13%, 29%, and 48% for PBO, IXE Q4W, and IXE Q2W, respectively, with statistically significantly greater improvement for IXE Q2W vs PBO (p< .05).

Conclusion: IXE demonstrated rapid efficacy in the treatment of AS/r-axSpA at wk 16 irrespective of baseline serum CRP levels or spinal MRI score.

References:

  1. Inman et al. 2008
  2. Braun et al. 2016
  3. de Vries et al. 2009
  4. Vastesaeger et al. 2011


Disclosure: W. Maksymowych, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie Inc., 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Synarc, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma ], 2, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Boehringer, 5, 8, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, 8, Canadian Research and Education Arthritis, 6, CARE ARTHRITIS, 3, 6, 9, Celgene, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, Synarc, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 8; G. Gallo, Eli Lilly, 1, 3, 4, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3, 4; R. Bolce, Eli Lilly, 1, 3, 4; F. Zhao, Eli Lilly, 1, 3, 4, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3, 4; V. Geneus, Eli Lilly, 1, 3; M. Østergaard, AbbVie, 2, 8, 9, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, UCB, 5, 8, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and UCB, 5, 8, Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, and Novartis, 2, Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, Novartis, 2, BMS, 2, 5, 8, 9, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 8, Boehringer-ingelheim, 9, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Centocor, 2, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, 9, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Eli-Lilly, 2, 8, Hospira, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, 9, Merck, 2, 5, 8, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Novo, 2, 5, 8, Novo Nordisk, 5, 8, Orion, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, 9, Regeneron, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, roche, 9, Sandoz, 2, 8, Sanofi, 2, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; K. Tada, Eli Lilly and Company, 2; A. Deodhar, AbbVie, 2, 5, 9, Abbvie, 5, 8, Abbvie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis AG, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, 5, 8, AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, GSK, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, 5, AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith and Klein, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 5, Amgen, 5, 8, 9, BMS, 2, 5, 8, BMS, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith & Kline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 2, BMS, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis AG, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, 9, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, Eli Lilly,, 5, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, 2, Galagagos, 5, Galapagos, 5, 8, 9, Glaxo Smith & Klein, 2, Glaxo Smith & Kline, 2, 5, 8, Glaxo Smith Klein, 5, Glaxo SmithKlein, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 8, GSK, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, 9, Janssen Pharmaceutica, 2, 5, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Lilly, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, 9, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, 9, UCB, 2, 5, 8, 9; L. Gensler, AbbVie, 2, 5, Abbvie, 2, 9, Amgen, 2, Amgen, AbbVie and Novartis, 2, Center for Disease Control, 8, Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 9, Eli Lilly and Company, 9, Galapagos, 5, 9, Galapagos, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, 5, Janssen, 5, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, 9, Pfizer, 2, 9, Spondylitis Association of America, 6, Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network (SPARTAN), 6, UCB, 2, 5, 9, UCB Pharma, 2, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maksymowych W, Gallo G, Bolce R, Zhao F, Geneus V, Østergaard M, Tada K, Deodhar A, Gensler L. Ixekizumab Is Effective in the Treatment of Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Regardless of the Level of C-Reactive Protein or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scores [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ixekizumab-is-effective-in-the-treatment-of-radiographic-axial-spondyloarthritis-regardless-of-the-level-of-c-reactive-protein-or-magnetic-resonance-imaging-scores/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ixekizumab-is-effective-in-the-treatment-of-radiographic-axial-spondyloarthritis-regardless-of-the-level-of-c-reactive-protein-or-magnetic-resonance-imaging-scores/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology