ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1449

Is Repeat Serum Urate Testing Superior to a Single Test to Predict Incident Gout over Time?

Sarah Stewart1, Amanda Phipps-Green2, Gregory Gamble1, Lisa Stamp3, William Taylor4, Tuhina Neogi5, Tony Merriman6 and Nicola Dalbeth1, 1University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2University of Otago Dunedin, Dunedin, New Zealand, 3University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand, 4University of Otago Wellington, Auckland, New Zealand, 5Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 6University of Alabama at Birmingham, Dunedin, New Zealand

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: gout, hyperuricemia

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Abstracts: Clinical Epidemiology (1446–1451)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:45PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Elevated serum urate is the most important risk factor for developing gout. However, in longitudinal cohort studies, a small proportion of people with normal urate levels develop gout and the majority of those with high urate levels do not. These observations may be due to subsequent variations in serum urate over time. It is unclear whether repeated testing of serum urate improves the ability to accurately predict development of gout. This analysis aimed to examine whether single or repeat testing of serum urate more accurately predicts incident gout over time.

Methods: Individual participant data was included from three publicly available cohorts: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC), Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA), and the original cohort of the Framingham Heart Study (FHS). Data from paired serum urate measures 3-5 years apart, followed by an assessment of gout incidence 5-6 years from the second urate measure were used to calculate the predictive ability of four models of serum urate measurement on incident gout: the first measure, the second measure, the average of the two measures, and the highest of the two measures. Participants with prevalent gout prior to the second measure were excluded. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) statistics were computed to compare the four models.

Results: A total of 16,017 participants were included across the three cohorts. Overall, 56% of participants were female, and 80% were European. The mean age of participants at baseline was 49 years. The mean follow-up from the first serum urate test was 9.3 years (range 8.9-10.1 years). Overall, there was a small increase in the mean serum urate between the first and second measures (5.42 mg/dL vs. 5.71 mg/dL, P< 0.001) which were a mean (SD) of 3.5 (0.9) years apart, but the first and second measures were highly correlated (r = 0.81, P< 0.001). No differences were observed in the predictive ability of incident gout between the four measures of serum urate measurement with ROC curve AUC statistics ranging between 0.81 (95% confidence intervals: 0.78-0.84) and 0.84 (95% confidence intervals: 0.81-0.87) (Table).

Conclusion: Repeat serum urate testing is not superior to a single measure of serum urate for prediction of incident gout over approximately one decade. These results may inform the design of longitudinal studies of incident gout, and clinical practice when providing advice to individuals about their risk of developing gout.


Disclosures: S. Stewart, None; A. Phipps-Green, None; G. Gamble, None; L. Stamp, None; W. Taylor, None; T. Neogi, Pfizer/Lilly, 2, Regeneron, 2, Novartis, 2; T. Merriman, None; N. Dalbeth, AstraZeneca, 2, JW Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2, PK Med, 2, Horizon, 2, Selecta, 2, Dyve Biosciences, 2, Arthrosi, 2, Amgen, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stewart S, Phipps-Green A, Gamble G, Stamp L, Taylor W, Neogi T, Merriman T, Dalbeth N. Is Repeat Serum Urate Testing Superior to a Single Test to Predict Incident Gout over Time? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-repeat-serum-urate-testing-superior-to-a-single-test-to-predict-incident-gout-over-time/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-repeat-serum-urate-testing-superior-to-a-single-test-to-predict-incident-gout-over-time/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology