ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0219

Is It Realistic to Stop Prednisone in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis? A Subanalysis from the BeSt and IMPROVED Studies

Raquel Dos-Santos1, Sytske Anne Bergstra2, J. M. Maassen2, Thomas Huizinga2 and CF Allaart2, 1Clinical University Hospital in Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain, 2Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: glucocorticoids, prognostic factors, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: RA Treatments & Their Safety

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Glucocorticoids are widely used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. It is internationally recommended to taper and stop glucocorticoids as rapidly as clinically feasible, but there are little data regarding this strategy. In two previous clinical trials (BeSt and IMPROVED) patients were treated with methotrexate (MTX) and a temporary course of oral prednisone (60 mg/day, tapered in 7 weeks to 7.5 mg/day). If the treatment target (TT, DAS≤2.4 in BeSt, DAS< 1.6 in IMPROVED) was achieved, prednisone was stopped, but in case of flare it was restarted. We present percentages of successful stopping and looked for potential predictors.

Methods: 508 early RA patients were recruited for the BeSt study, from those 133 patients were randomized into the third arm of treatment (MTX+Sulfasalazin+Prednisone). 610 early RA or undifferentiated arthritis patients were enrolled into the IMPROVED study, all receiving MTX+Prednisone. Disease Activity Score was measured each 3 and 4 months, respectively. Stepwise tapering was slow in BeSt (prednisone tapered only after repeated treatment target achieved, earliest stop at week 35) and more rapid in IMPROVED (prednisone stop as soon as treatment target achieved, earliest at week 16), with a restart in case of flare 3 (BeSt) or 4 months (IMPROVED) after stop, respectively. Percentages still on treatment target after  stopping of prednisone were compared in BeSt and IMPROVED. Univariable logistic regression was performed to identify potential predictors of successful stopping. Predictors with p< 0.2 were included in multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results: In the BeSt study, 67/133 (50%) could stop initial prednisone due to sustained low disease activity (Figure 1). After prednisone stop, 51/67 (76%) patients remained on TT, but 18 flared. In the IMPROVED study, 387/610 (63%) patients stopped prednisone because of DAS-remission at 4 months (Figure 1). Of those, 269/387 (70%) remained on TT after stopping prednisone, while 112 flared. Baseline patient and disease characteristics between patients who did or did not flare after prednisone stop in both studies are shown in Table 1. In the BeSt study, DAS at previous visit was an independent predictor for successful secondary stopping of prednisone (p=0.005, Table 2). In the IMPROVED multivariable testing showed female gender and lower DAS at previous visit as independent predictors of successful secondary stopping prednisone (p< 0.03) Fulfilling the 2010 classification criteria for RA was not associated with the outcome after PRD stop (Table 2).

Conclusion: In these treat-to-target studies, where initial co-treatment with prednisone was stopped after the treatment target was (repeatedly, in BeSt) achieved, a lower DAS at the visit before stopping, was predictive of remaining on treatment target without flare. In IMPROVED, female patients also could more often successfully stop prednisone. Successful stopping of initial co-treatment with prednisone appears to be irrespective of treatment duration and treatment target. The data suggest that in patients with early RA the duration of temporary ‘bridging’ treatment of prednisone should be individually timed.

Figure 1: flow chart of the patient selection in BeSt and IMPROVED studies. m (month), DF (drug-free).

Table 1: baseline characteristics in the BeSt and IMPROVED studies for patients on and off treatment target after stopping prednisone. RF (Rheumatoid Factor), ACPA (Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies), bDAS (baseline DAS), pDAS (previous visit DAS), CRP (C-Reactive Protein, mg/dl), bVASGH (basal Visual Analogue Score Global Health).

Table 2: univariable and multivariable analysis of predictors for successful GC stopping (OR 95% CI) in the BeSt and IMPROVED studies. RF (Rheumatoid Factor), ACPA (Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies), bDAS (baseline DAS), pDAS (previous visit DAS), CRP (C-Reactive Protein, mg/dl), ∆DAS (difference between DAS at current visit and DAS at baseline), bVASGH (basal Visual Analogue Score Global Health).


Disclosure: R. Dos-Santos, None; S. Bergstra, None; J. Maassen, None; T. Huizinga, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 2, 8, Pfizer, 2, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 8, LUMC, 9; C. Allaart, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dos-Santos R, Bergstra S, Maassen J, Huizinga T, Allaart C. Is It Realistic to Stop Prednisone in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis? A Subanalysis from the BeSt and IMPROVED Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-it-realistic-to-stop-prednisone-in-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-subanalysis-from-the-best-and-improved-studies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-it-realistic-to-stop-prednisone-in-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-subanalysis-from-the-best-and-improved-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology