ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0612

Is Antimalarial Use Associated with a Reduced Risk of Lupus Nephritis in Patients with SLE? Results from an Inception Cohort-Based Study

Fadi Kharouf1, JuanPablo Diaz Martinez2, Pankti Mehta3, Dafna D. Gladman4, Laura Whitall Garcia5 and Zahi Touma6, 1University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3University of Toronto, Gladman Krembil Psoriatic Arthritis Research Program, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Cohort Study, Lupus nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0593–0640) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Antimalarials, particularly hydroxychloroquine, are a cornerstone of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) management, with well-established benefits including reduced disease activity, prevention of flares, and mitigation of long-term organ damage. We aimed to assess whether antimalarial use is associated with a decreased risk of developing incident lupus nephritis (LN) among patients with SLE.

Methods: We included SLE patients from an inception cohort without prior diagnosis of LN, followed prospectively at regular intervals. The association between antimalarial exposure (measured as cumulative duration in years) and the development of LN (defined by new-onset proteinuria as per SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI-2K]) was evaluated using a time-dependent univariable Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the overall effect. A time-dependent multivariable Cox regression model adjusted for clinically relevant covariates was also employed to estimate the risk of LN in the full cohort and, in a sensitivity analysis, among patients with serologically active disease. Death was treated as a competing risk.

Results: A total of 674 inception SLE patients were included, with a median baseline age of 33.6 years [IQR: 24.9, 45.4] (Table 1). Over 6,961.5 patient-years of follow-up, 154 patients (22.8%) developed new-onset SLE-related proteinuria, indicating LN, yielding an incidence rate of 2.2 cases per 100 person-years. The median time to LN onset was 3.6 years [IQR: 0.9–8.8]. Cumulative antimalarial exposure was not significantly associated with reduced LN risk, in either the univariable analysis (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.94–1.02, p=0.25) or the adjusted multivariable model (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92–1.00, p=0.08) (Table 2). Similar results were observed in the sensitivity analysis restricted to patients who presented with serologically active disease (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.89–1.01, p=0.12) (Table 3). Notably, shorter SLE duration (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.58–0.71 per 10-year increase) and higher SLEDAI-2K scores (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.19–1.26) were significantly associated with increased risk of LN (Table 2). This association persisted in patients with serologically active disease, along with glucocorticoid use (Table 3), likely reflecting confounding by indication.

Conclusion: In this inception cohort-based study, antimalarial use was not significantly associated with a reduced risk of incident LN. These findings should be interpreted within the context of the study’s specific objective and are not intended to challenge the well-established role of antimalarials in the management of SLE or their recognized clinical benefits. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our results.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: F. Kharouf: None; J. Diaz Martinez: None; P. Mehta: None; D. Gladman: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Johnson & Johnson, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, UCB, 2, 5; L. Whitall Garcia: None; Z. Touma: AbbVie, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Merck KgaA, 2, Novartis, 1, Roche, 2, Sarkana Pharma Inc, 2, UCB/Biopharma, 1, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kharouf F, Diaz Martinez J, Mehta P, Gladman D, Whitall Garcia L, Touma Z. Is Antimalarial Use Associated with a Reduced Risk of Lupus Nephritis in Patients with SLE? Results from an Inception Cohort-Based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-antimalarial-use-associated-with-a-reduced-risk-of-lupus-nephritis-in-patients-with-sle-results-from-an-inception-cohort-based-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-antimalarial-use-associated-with-a-reduced-risk-of-lupus-nephritis-in-patients-with-sle-results-from-an-inception-cohort-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology