ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2078

Interim Evaluation of a 6 Year Remote Online Adaptive Learning Platform Module for Rheumatology Fellows: Applied Rheumatology on the Go

Lisa Traboco1, Katrina Joy Chua2, Sheila Marie Reyes3 and Sandra Navarra4, 1University of the Philippines - Manila, St Luke's Medical Center - Bonifacio Global City, Paranaque, Manila, Philippines, 2Providence Hospital, Quezon City, Philippines, 3St. Luke's Medical Center, Cainta, Philippines, 4University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Joint and Bone Center, Manila, Philippines

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Education, education, medical

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2061–2088) Professional Education Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The ARGO Project (applied rheumatology on the go) is an online learning tool in Rheumatology. It uses Cerego, an adaptive learning technology online/mobile platform. Started in 2017, by integrating distance learning (or e-learning), busy trainees or early career Rheumatologists can review or update themselves in Basic and Applied Rheumatology. The 20 modules of various rheumatology question materials are presented to the learner depending on their individual learning patterns. Items that the learner seems to have more difficulty with will be shown more frequently compared to items they find easy. There are notes, and external resources for the learner to facilitate asynchronous learning. Users and instructors can track progress and determine the difficulty of questions.

Methods: The platform is catered towards helping recently graduated fellows into reviewing prior to their board exams. Enrollment is voluntary through interest and word of mouth from past fellows. This year, instructor editors were invited to help update the content of the project.

Usability surveys on the use of the platform were sent to the society communications group. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the results. Free text answers were categorized into themes.

Results: At the time of this interim analysis only 21 of the prior 70 past and current fellows agreed to evaluate the platform. 33% of the respondents were from the first batch of 2017, followed by 2019. 66% of the fellows did not know how to use the Spaced Repetition concept. For those who used the platform for more than 1 yr (those who did not pass the board exam the first time), only 2 out of 9 respondents used it less for the second year. When asked about the content of the modules, the majority of the respondents answered it was above average. It is expected to see some feedback about the need to upgrade the information since the module was originally started in 2017. With regards to technical quality, a few respondents recommended adding more images and videos. This is important feedback given the increase in use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in our curriculum over the last few years. Nevertheless it is reassuring to see that navigation was still easy for the users. When asked which part of the project they favored the most, the majority selected the flashcards and mnemonic notes. All respondents felt they would recommend the platform as a learning tool. For the free text comments, there appeared to be some common suggestions themes such as automation: notification messages or emails when not logging in at appropriate intervals. Another common suggestion theme was to use the platform in tandem with the examination blueprint topics.

Conclusion: The survey will continue until the next interval progress report as part of the ILAR grant requirements. It is reassuring to see that a 6 year old module retains most of it’s usability for medical education. Additional images and videos may be needed for improved user experience. For the next phase of the project, a separate feedback form will be sent to the instructor-editor groups invited to update the content of the modules.

Supporting image 1

Usability survey of the ARGO project: Content and Technological Quality

Supporting image 2

Usability survey of the ARGO project: Navigation and favorite feature


Disclosures: L. Traboco: None; K. Chua: None; S. Reyes: None; S. Navarra: Astellas, 6, AstraZeneca, 6, Biogen, 2, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, GSK, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Traboco L, Chua K, Reyes S, Navarra S. Interim Evaluation of a 6 Year Remote Online Adaptive Learning Platform Module for Rheumatology Fellows: Applied Rheumatology on the Go [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/interim-evaluation-of-a-6-year-remote-online-adaptive-learning-platform-module-for-rheumatology-fellows-applied-rheumatology-on-the-go/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/interim-evaluation-of-a-6-year-remote-online-adaptive-learning-platform-module-for-rheumatology-fellows-applied-rheumatology-on-the-go/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology