ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0218

Incidental Findings on Whole Body 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trial Population

Christina Costeas1, Daniel Solomon2, Katherine Liao3, Jon Giles4, Joan Bathon5 and Jane Kang6, and the TARGET Trial Consortium, 1Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Newton, MA, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 5Columbia University, NEW YORK, NY, 6Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Computed tomography (CT), Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster I: Inflammatory Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Performing whole body imaging inevitably reveals incidental findings in the majority of cases. A clinical trial was conducted to determine whether different treatment strategies for RA impact cardiovascular risk through measurement of arterial inflammation via 18F-FDG PET/CT. Participants recruited to this trial underwent a whole body FDG-PET/CT at the beginning of the trial and at 24 weeks after a step-up in RA treatment. To our knowledge, there is limited data on large populations of people with RA who have had whole body FDG-PET/CT scans performed for non-oncologic reasons. The prevalence of incidental findings in this population is therefore unclear.

Methods: Whole body FDG-PET/CT scans were performed for the 159 participants enrolled in the clinical trial and were interpreted by a radiologist to identify incidental findings. The radiology reports were reviewed and incidental findings were categorized by body system and FDG-avidity. An incidental finding was defined as any finding on the CT or PET component of the scan which was not related to the study objective. A clinically actionable finding was defined as any finding the reading radiologist flagged for further follow-up excluding recommendations to correlate clinically. A finding present on both the baseline and follow-up scan was only counted once. For FDG-avid lymph nodes, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) was reported if available and the change in SUV was calculated if applicable.

Results: There were one or more incidental findings in 82% of participants. There was one or more FDG-avid incidental finding in 62% of participants. There were 46 clinically actionable findings noted for a total of 40 participants. Further imaging was recommended for 28 findings. Specialist consultation or procedural evaluation was recommended for 15 findings. The most common non-FDG avid findings were pulmonary nodules, diverticulosis, cholelithiasis, sinus disease, and vascular calcifications. The most common FDG-avid findings were hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy (LAD), increased gastric/esophageal uptake, increased bowel uptake, and increased pharyngeal uptake. LAD was noted in at least one region in 39% of participants. FDG-avid LAD was present in 35% of participants. The median maximum SUV was 5.1 (IQR 3.8-6.8). The most common site of LAD was the axillary region with 26% of participants having enlarged or hypermetabolic axillary lymph nodes.

Conclusion: The majority of incidental findings were interpreted by radiologists to be benign or to not require further evaluation. The most common incidental finding was hypermetabolic axillary LAD. It is not known how the degree of incidentally noted LAD in this study compares to that in the general population.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: C. Costeas: None; D. Solomon: Amgen, 5, Janssen, 5, UpToDate, 9; K. Liao: None; J. Giles: AbbVie, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2; J. Bathon: None; J. Kang: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Costeas C, Solomon D, Liao K, Giles J, Bathon J, Kang J. Incidental Findings on Whole Body 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trial Population [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/incidental-findings-on-whole-body-18f-fdg-pet-ct-in-a-rheumatoid-arthritis-clinical-trial-population/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/incidental-findings-on-whole-body-18f-fdg-pet-ct-in-a-rheumatoid-arthritis-clinical-trial-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology