ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0154

Incidence and Prevalence of Connective Tissue Diseases with Interstitial Lung Disease (CTD-ILD) in the United States

Diana Martins1, George Mu2, Elaine Irving3, Roger A. Levy4, Nisha Bhatt5 and Keele E. Wurst6, 1GSK, Epidemiology, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2GSK, Statistics, Collegeville, PA, 3GSK, Clinical, Stevenage, United Kingdom, 4GSK, Specialty Care, Global Medical Affairs, Collegeville, PA, 5GSK, Global Medical Affairs, Collegeville, PA, 6GSK, Immunology and Emerging Epidemiology, Durham, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Comorbidity, Epidemiology, interstitial lung disease

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0145–0174) Epidemiology & Public Health Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Despite the high disease burden and reduced quality of life for patients with CTD-ILD, data on its incidence and prevalence – particularly by CTD subtype (RA, SSc, SLE, IIM, MCTD and pSS) – remains limited. This study describes the incidence and prevalence of CTD-ILD and its subtypes in the US.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study (GSK Studies 223907, 224023) of two large US databases (Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record data set [Optum® EHR], and MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Databases [MarketScan]) identified adults with CTD-ILD subgroups of interest between January 2018 and December 2023, using ICD-10 diagnosis codes and algorithms, in a two-step process: 1) identifying individuals with CTD, and 2) identifying ILD on or within 365 days before or after the CTD diagnosis. Index date: the later date of the first CTD or ILD diagnosis. Identified CTD-ILD cases were classified as prevalent. Of those, incident cases required a 1-year enrolment prior to index with no ILD claims during this “washout” period. Incidence was presented per 100,000 person-years (PY) and prevalence per 100,000 persons (comprising crude rates, including stratification by age and sex, and age- and sex-adjusted rates).

Results: Among all patients with CTD-ILD identified (N&#3f20,276 Optum® EHR and N&#3f9342 MarketScan), most were female (Optum® EHR: 74.1%; MarketScan: 76.0%), with median (interquartile range) age of 65 (56, 73) years (Optum® EHR) and 56 (49, 63) (MarketScan), and had RA-ILD (Optum® EHR: 57.4%, MarketScan: 53.2%). In Optum® EHR, race of patients was 73.2% Caucasian, 16.8% Black, 2.6% Asian, and 7.4% had missing race. Race of patients was not captured in MarketScan.Age- and sex-adjusted rates for CTD-ILD overall were 9.4 (Optum® EHR) and 10.7 (MarketScan) per 100,000 PY for incidence (Table 1), and 45.1 (Optum® EHR) and 44.5 (MarketScan) per 100,000 persons for prevalence (Table 2). Age- and sex- adjusted incidence varied by CTD subtype in Optum® EHR (0.7 [MCTD-ILD] to 5.6 [RA-ILD]) and MarketScan (0.7 [MCTD-ILD] to 6.6 [RA-ILD]) (Table 1). This variation also existed for adjusted prevalence rates (Table 2). Crude stratified rates were approximately double in females versus males, and ≥3 × higher in ages 65 and older versus 18–64 years, across all CTD-ILD subtypes (Tables 1 and 2). Incidence and prevalence rates increased over the study period.

Conclusion: The scarcity of US data on CTD-ILD epidemiology underscores the importance of investigating ILD in patients with CTD, and vice versa, to aid diagnosis and intervention, particularly in older patients and females, where CTD-ILD incidence and prevalence rates are highest. Overall, CTD-ILD incidence and prevalence rates were highest for RA-ILD, corresponding to the higher rates of RA compared with other CTD subtypes. Importantly, findings for age- and sex-adjusted rates were similar between these two large US databases capturing different US patient populations. These prevalence data suggest that 116,000–118,000 individuals in the US have CTD-ILD (based on 2023 adult population estimated at 262.1 million). These novel data highlight a substantial healthcare burden, especially in older patients and females.Funding: GSK Original presentation: EULAR 2025

Supporting image 1Table 1. Crude and adjusted incidence (per 100,000 person-years) of CTD-ILD – overall and in CTD-ILD subgroups of interest – in US Optum® EHR and MarketScan databases.

*Overall captures any CTD-ILD (no duplicates), using ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Patients may be captured in more than 1 CTD subtype but will contribute only once to the CTD-ILD overall column.

CI, confidence interval; CTD, connective tissue diseases; EHR, electronic health record; ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision; IIM, idiopathic inflammatory myositis; ILD, interstitial lung disease; MCTD, mixed connective tissue disease; pSS, primary Sjögren’s syndrome; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc, systemic sclerosis.

Supporting image 2Table 2. Crude and adjusted prevalence (per 100,000 persons) of CTD-ILD – overall and in CTD-ILD subgroups of interest – in US Optum® EHR and MarketScan databases.

*Overall captures any CTD-ILD (no duplicates), using ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Patients may be captured in more than 1 CTD subtype but will contribute only once to the CTD-ILD overall column.

CI, confidence interval; CTD, connective tissue diseases; EHR, electronic health record; ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision; IIM, idiopathic inflammatory myositis; ILD, interstitial lung disease; MCTD, mixed connective tissue disease; pSS, primary Sjögren’s syndrome; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc, systemic sclerosis.


Disclosures: D. Martins: GSK, 12,, 3; G. Mu: GSK, 12,, 3, 8; E. Irving: GSK, 12,, 3; R. Levy: GSK, 3, 8; N. Bhatt: Amgen, 12,, GSK, 12,, 3; K. Wurst: GSK, 12,, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Martins D, Mu G, Irving E, Levy R, Bhatt N, Wurst K. Incidence and Prevalence of Connective Tissue Diseases with Interstitial Lung Disease (CTD-ILD) in the United States [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/incidence-and-prevalence-of-connective-tissue-diseases-with-interstitial-lung-disease-ctd-ild-in-the-united-states/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/incidence-and-prevalence-of-connective-tissue-diseases-with-interstitial-lung-disease-ctd-ild-in-the-united-states/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology