ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1069

Improving Triage Accuracy of Unclear Rheumatology Referrals: A Quality Improvement Study

Stephanie Gottheil1, Chiara Gottheil2 and Joseph Carson3, and Canadian Rheumatology Association - CIORA Grant, 1London Rheumatology, London, 2London Rheumatology, London, Canada, 3London Rheumatology, London, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Access to care, Measurement, Quality Indicators, quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Patients with early inflammatory arthritis (EIA) need to be seen urgently to initiate treatment. Our community rheumatology clinic in Ontario, Canada was concerned that EIA cases may be delayed unnecessarily if referrals lacked sufficient detail to triage accurately. In a prior quality improvement project, we redesigned our triage process to include a patient survey (the “EIA Tool”), which was validated to identify referrals with EIA. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the new triage process for referrals with unclear urgency after 12 months of use.

Methods: All referrals accepted by one rheumatologist were included from April 2020-July 2022. During the intervention period, we implemented the new triage process. The rheumatologist triaged all referrals as urgent, non-urgent, or unclear. Patients with unclear urgency were asked to complete the online EIA Tool (Figure 1) prior to scheduling. Their survey result determined a triage score of urgent or non-urgent, and consultations were scheduled accordingly. Post-consultation, the rheumatologist determined the ‘true’ urgency score, while blinded to the pre-consultation score. Data were collected prospectively on all incoming referrals. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the baseline and new triage processes.

Results: The 16-month baseline period (April 2020 to July 2021) included 1296 referrals; 647 (50%) were triaged as urgent. The 12-month intervention period (August 2021-July 2022), included 888 referrals; 508 (57%) were triaged as urgent, and 97 (11%) were triaged as unclear. The EIA tool was completed in all unclear cases; 93 patients submitted the survey online, and 4 patients without email completed the survey by phone. Most patients (86%) completed the survey within 1 day of receiving it. Unclear cases had a cycle time from referral to scheduling of 5 days, compared to 3 days for those who were not sent the EIA tool. The sensitivity to identify urgent cases was 97% during the intervention versus 85% at baseline. The specificity during the intervention was 59% versus 70% at baseline.

Conclusion: The EIA Tool helped us detect 97% of truly urgent cases, thereby reducing the risk of delayed treatment caused by triage error. We have since spread this process to four rheumatologists in our clinic. Our next step is to analyze urgent referral volume using statistical process control charts, in order to modify our scheduling algorithm.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. EIA tool survey as it appears to patients. Patients with 6 or more ‘yes’ answers are triaged as urgent, while patients with less than 6 ‘yes’ answers are triaged as non-urgent.


Disclosures: S. Gottheil: None; C. Gottheil: None; J. Carson: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gottheil S, Gottheil C, Carson J. Improving Triage Accuracy of Unclear Rheumatology Referrals: A Quality Improvement Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-triage-accuracy-of-unclear-rheumatology-referrals-a-quality-improvement-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-triage-accuracy-of-unclear-rheumatology-referrals-a-quality-improvement-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology