ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2219

Improving Outcomes with a Multimedia Patient Education Tool in Patients with Osteoporosis after 6 Months. a Randomized Controlled Trial

Maria A. Lopez-Olivo1, Andrea Barbo2, Tara Rizvi3, Robert Volk4, Heather Lin5 and Maria E. Suarez-Almazor1, 1General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 2Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 3Rheumatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 4General Internal Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 5Biostatistics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Education, educational innovation, educational research and patient engagement, patient, RCT

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Education Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: We conducted a 6-month multi-centered, open-label, parallel, randomized control trial to compare a multimedia-patient education tool (MM-PtET) including storylines and narratives with a written booklet for participants with osteoporosis (OP).

Methods: 225 participants were recruited from 3 outpatient clinics and newspaper advertisement. Inclusion criteria were: (i) diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia, (ii) female gender, (iii) age ≥50 years (iv) at least 3 years post-menopausal, (v) adequate cognitive status, and (vi) ability to communicate in English or Spanish language. Participants were randomized through an institutional web system to either a MM-PtET or a written booklet with same content as MM-PtET. All participants completed questionnaire at baseline (pre and post), 3 and 6 months. Primary outcome measures included: disease knowledge, decisional conflict, and role preferences. Secondary outcomes were: self-efficacy and disease management.

Results: 111 participants were randomly allocated to the MM-PtET intervention and 114 to the control booklet. Mean age of participants was 64±9 years and 82% had adequate health literacy. 183 (85=MM-PtET, 98=booklet) and 189 (90=MM-PtET, 99=booklet) participants returned their questionnaires at 3 and 6 months, respectively.  Within groups most outcomes were improved from baseline to 3 and 6 months.  At 6 months, more participants in the MM-PtET group switched from active to passive role preference after watching the MM-PtET compared to patients reading the booklet (11% vs 3%, p=0.03). Results from linear regression on the difference between baseline and 6 month scores showed that younger age (p=0.03, p=NS, p=0.04) and receiving booklet among patients with inadequate health literacy levels (p= 0.02, p=0.009, p=0.05, p=0.02) were associated with greater improvements in the total decision conflict scale, uninformed, and clarity subscales, and self-efficacy.  In contrast, receiving MM-PtET among patients with adequate health literacy levels led to greater improvements in the uninformed subscale (p=0.03).  Greater improvements in the effective disease management scale were associated with younger age (p=0.03). Generalized estimating equation analysis showed that after adjusting for correlated outcome data and controlling for other variables, patients who received the intervention had higher odds of active role preference for disease management if they belonged to the inadequate health literacy group (p=0.02).  Also, the odds of active role preference among participants receiving the intervention are higher than controls but the magnitude decreases with longer disease duration (p=0.004).

Conclusion: Regardless of the delivery method, patients improve outcomes with educational materials up to 6 months after being informed. Participants with either adequate or inadequate health literacy levels improved outcomes with the MM-PtET.


Disclosure: M. A. Lopez-Olivo, None; A. Barbo, None; T. Rizvi, None; R. Volk, None; H. Lin, None; M. E. Suarez-Almazor, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lopez-Olivo MA, Barbo A, Rizvi T, Volk R, Lin H, Suarez-Almazor ME. Improving Outcomes with a Multimedia Patient Education Tool in Patients with Osteoporosis after 6 Months. a Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-outcomes-with-a-multimedia-patient-education-tool-in-patients-with-osteoporosis-after-6-months-a-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-outcomes-with-a-multimedia-patient-education-tool-in-patients-with-osteoporosis-after-6-months-a-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology