ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 857

Impact of Urate Lowering Therapy On Renal Disease Progression in Patients With Hyperuricemia

Gerald D. Levy1, T. Craig Cheetham2, Nazia Rashid3 and Fang Niu2, 1Int Med/Rheumatology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Downey, CA, 2Pharmacy Analytical Services, Kaiser Permanente, Downey, CA, 3Pharmacy Analytical Services, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Downey, CA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout, hyperuricemia, Renal disease, treatment and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

The relationship between elevated serum Uric Acid [sUA] and progression of chronic kidney disease is well established.1-3 There are a several small studies on the impact of  Urate Lowering Therapy (ULT) on renal progression or ESRD.4-6 This large study  evaluated patients with hyperuricemia and  the impact of ULT on renal function.

 

Methods:

This retrospective, database study identified 111,992 patients with a serum uric acid level (sUA) of ≥ 7mg/dl [Index Date (ID)] from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2010. Patients with at least 12 months of Health Plan membership including drug benefit prior to ID were studied. All patients had at least one sUA and Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) level within the 6 months period prior to the ID and at least one sUA and GFR in the follow up period following the ID (follow up period). A ≥ 30% reduction in GFR, initiation of dialysis or a GFR ≤ 15 ml/min were defined as Outcome Events. All subjects were ULT naïve to allopurinol, probenecid and febuxostat in the 12 months before the ID. At ID, subjects were ≥18 years of age, without chronic kidney disease (CKD) 4 or 5, on dialysis, HIV, non-remission cancer, proteinuria, nephrolithiasis, or organ transplantation.  Patients who met inclusion criteria were followed until they had an Outcome Event, disenrolled, died,  the end of the follow up period or the conclusion of the study, 12/31/2011..  The cohort was subdivided into three groups: never treated (NT), ULT time on therapy of <80% (<80%) and time on therapy of ≥80% (≥80%). Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine factors associated with renal function decline.

 

Results:

A total of 16,186 patients met inclusion criteria with 11,192 NT patients, 3,902 with <80% and 1,092 with ≥80%.  The ≥80% group tended to be older, male with more co-morbidities compared to NT or <80% groups.  The ≥80% group received ULT earlier than <80% group with 43.5% compared to 16.9% starting within 2 weeks of ID and 94% compared to 41% starting within 4 months. Allopurinol accounted for 98.3% of ULT and deaths were equally represented amongst the groups at 1.2%.  Factors associated with outcome events were age, female gender, hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, previous hospitalizations, higher sUA at baseline and rheumatoid arthritis.  Time on therapy of ≥80% was not associated with outcome events 1.07 (0.76-1.52, p=0.68) however those patients with a sUA <6mg/dL had a significant 37% reduction in events p=<0.0001 HR 0.63 (0.5-0.78).  See Table 1.

Conclusion:

Serum Uric Acid is an independent risk factor for progressive renal function decline. Time on ULT was not associated with a reduction in renal disease progression, but in patients who achieved the ACR goal of sUA <6mg/dL7 there was a 37% reduction in outcome events.

Table 1: Cox Proportional Hazard Model for Risk Factors

Results After
Statistical Analysis

Hazard Ratio

95% CI

p value

 

 

 

 

Age at Index

1.03

1.02-1.04

<0.0001

 

 

 

 

Gender: F vs M

1.49

1.25-1.78

<0.0001

 

 

 

 

Ethnicity

 

 

 

  Asian vs White

0.86

0.64-1.14

0.29

    Black vs White

1.05

0.85-1.31

0.64

    Hispanic vs White

0.94

0.71-1.24

0.65

 

 

 

 

Co-Morbities

 

 

 

Hypertension

1.50

1.17-1.93

0.00

Obesity

0.96

0.79-1.18

0.71

Diabetes

1.96

1.64-2.35

<0.0001

Dyslipidemia

0.92

0.77-1.11

0.39

Cardiovascular Ds

1.15

0.93-1.42

0.21

Congestive Heart Failure

1.39

1.04-1.85

0.03

Osteoarthritis

1.05

0.86-1.29

0.62

Rheumatoid Arthritis

1.46

0.84-2.54

0.19

 

 

 

 

Concomitant medications

 

 

 

NSAIDs

0.85

0.72-1.01

0.07

Colchicine

1.08

0.82-1.42

0.58

Corticosteroids

0.92

0.73-1.17

0.49

 

 

 

 

Patient characteristics

 

 

 

Previous Hospitalizations

1.33

1.12-1.59

0.00

GFR at Baseline

1.01

0.99-1.01

0.12

sUA levels at Baseline

1.11

1.04-1.19

0.00

Gout Diagnosis at Index

1.00

0.81-1.24

0.99

 

 

 

 

Role of therapy and (sUA<6)

 

 

 

<80% Time on Rx vs Never

1.27

1.05-1.55

0.01

≥80% Time on Rx vs Never

1.08

0.76-1.52

0.68

sUA at Goal vs Not at Goal

0.63

0.5-0.78

<0.0001

 


Disclosure:

G. D. Levy,
None;

T. C. Cheetham,
None;

N. Rashid,
None;

F. Niu,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-urate-lowering-therapy-on-renal-disease-progression-in-patients-with-hyperuricemia/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology