ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1431

Impact of Tofacitinib on Fracture Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Karen E Hansen1, Mahta Mortezavi2, Edward Nagy3, Cunshan Wang4, Carol A Connell4, Zaher Radi5, Heather J Litman6, Giovanni Adami7 and Maurizio Rossini7, 1Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 2Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, 3Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, United Kingdom, 4Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 5Pfizer Inc., Cambridge, MA, 6CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, 7Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: clinical trial, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Fracture, registry, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: RA – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Preclinical data suggest that tofacitinib stimulates osteoblast function and would have a protective effect on bone health and fracture risk in RA.1 We report post hoc analyses of tofacitinib clinical trials and a real-world data registry to assess the impact of tofacitinib on fracture risk in patients (pts) with RA.

Methods: We assessed fracture risk in pooled analyses of the tofacitinib RA Phase 1/2/3 and long-term extension studies (P123LTE) and the placebo-controlled portions of the Phase 3 studies, and separately in ORAL Surveillance (NCT02092467; a Phase 3b/4 randomized, open-label, post-authorization safety study, evaluating tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily [BID] vs TNF inhibitors [TNFi]).2 Incidence rates (pts with events/100 pt-years) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for all fractures and osteoporotic fractures, and multivariable Cox modelling via backward selection was performed in the P123LTE cohort to identify risk factors. Data from the CorEvitas RA registry (a US-based prospective, multicenter, observational registry) were used to analyze fracture risk in pts initiating tofacitinib vs biologic (b)DMARDs. Propensity score (PS) trimming and matching was applied to the CorEvitas population to generate pt cohorts with comparable characteristics,3 and HRs were calculated for the PS trimmed and matched populations.

Results: In pooled clinical trial data, rates of all fractures were numerically lower with tofacitinib vs placebo (HR [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.55 [0.18, 1.65] for 5 mg BID and 0.72 [0.26, 2.01] for 10 mg BID; Fig 1a) and were similar for tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID-treated pts (Fig 1a and 1b). In ORAL Surveillance, HRs (95% CIs) for all fractures with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID vs TNFi were 1.23 (0.96, 1.58) and 1.26 (0.97, 1.62), respectively (Fig 1c). Risk factors for fractures in multivariable analysis included age ≥ 60 years, female sex, and baseline corticosteroid use (Fig 2), known risk factors for fractures in the general population.4 In CorEvitas registry data, HRs (95% CIs) for any fracture with tofacitinib vs bDMARDs were 1.27 (0.82, 1.97) with PS trimming, and 1.42 (0.96, 2.09) with PS matching (p > 0.05; Fig 3).

Conclusion: Pooled clinical trial data in pts with RA showed no increased risk of fractures with tofacitinib vs placebo and no clear dose effects. No unique risk factors for fractures were identified compared with those known for the general population.4 Fracture rates were numerically higher with tofacitinib vs TNFi in ORAL Surveillance. In real-world data, numerically higher fracture rates were found with tofacitinib vs bDMARDs, but the difference was not statistically significant. Pts with fracture risk factors should be monitored and treated per established standards of care.

1. Adam et al. Sci Transl Med 2020; 12: eaay4447
2. Ytterberg et al. N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 316-26
3. Kremer et al. ACR Open Rheumatol 2021; 3: 173-84
4. Kanis et al. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19: 385-97

Studies sponsored by Pfizer and CorEvitas, LLC (for the CorEvitas RA registry; analysis funded by Pfizer). CorEvitas is supported by contracted subscriptions with multiple companies. Medical writing support was provided by J King, CMC Connect, and funded by Pfizer.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: K. Hansen, None; M. Mortezavi, Pfizer Inc; E. Nagy, Pfizer Inc; C. Wang, Pfizer Inc; C. Connell, Pfizer Inc; Z. Radi, Pfizer Inc; H. Litman, CorEvitas; G. Adami, Galapagos, Theramex; M. Rossini, Theramex, UCB, Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sandoz.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hansen K, Mortezavi M, Nagy E, Wang C, Connell C, Radi Z, Litman H, Adami G, Rossini M. Impact of Tofacitinib on Fracture Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-tofacitinib-on-fracture-risk-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-tofacitinib-on-fracture-risk-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology