ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0449

Identification of Serum Protein Biomarkers at Baseline to Distinguish Radiographic Progressors from Non-Progressors in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Orla Coleman1, Bruna Wundervald2, Ruoyi Zhou3, James Waddington3, Robert LJ Graham4, Ciaren Graham4, Geoff McMullan4, Andrew C. Parnell5, Vinod Chandran6, Philip Mease7, Gaia Gallo8, Venkatesh Krishnan8, Stephen Pennington9 and Oliver FitzGerald10, 1Atturos, Bray, Ireland, 2Atturos, Maynooth, Ireland, 3Atturos, Belfield, Ireland, 4Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, 5Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland, 6Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 8Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 9University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, 10Conway Institute for Biomolecular Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Biomarkers, clinical trial, proteomics, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: Abstracts: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes I (0449–0452)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:30AM-9:45AM

Background/Purpose: A delay in diagnosis and management of patients with PsA leads to poor radiographic and functional outcomes [1]. The need to identify which patients might progress radiographically has been recognised by the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) as a key area of unmet need within PsA [2]. It is anticipated that biomarkers for radiographic joint damage will help in patient stratification so those with greater likelihood of poor outcome may be treated more timely and aggressively. The identification of such biomarkers would also be useful in clinical research to evaluate novel treatment efficacy in selected subjects at higher risk of rapid progression. The SPIRIT-P1 (NCT01695239) Phase 3 randomized controlled trial (RCT) of ixekizumab, a high-affinity IL-17A antagonist antibody, in active PsA patients resulted in reduced progression of structural damage [3], however 5-10% of patients who progressed may have benefitted from an earlier or more aggressive treatment if identified using biomarkers at the outset. The aim of this study was to use mass spectrometry-based proteomics to identify protein biomarkers which might distinguish at baseline those patients who progress to joint damage from those who will not. Top-ranking protein biomarkers were then combined with key clinical parameters to try to improve the discrimination of progressors (P) from non-progressors (NP) to joint damage.

Methods: Baseline serum samples from 83 PsA patients (28 P and 55 NP) were obtained from the SPIRIT-P1 RCT. Radiographic P showed a >0.5 change from baseline modified total Sharp score at week 24 or 52. Two proteomic analyses were performed: 1) unbiased discovery using mass spectrometry of the 83 baseline samples; and 2) targeted analysis of in-house panel of 206 proteins originally developed to distinguish between arthropathies. Univariate and multivariate machine learning random forest modelling was undertaken on the 2 proteomic datasets.

Results: Unbiased discovery proteomics resulted in the identification of 74 unique peptides which were significantly differentially expressed (ANOVA p< 0.01). Random forest modelling identified 15 top-ranking peptides which could distinguish NP from P with a ROC AUC of 0.94. Univariate analysis of the 206 proteins measured by targeted proteomics revealed 4 differentially expressed peptides (ANOVA p< 0.01) and random forest modelling revealed the top 15 candidate peptides could distinguish P from NP with a ROC AUC of 0.85. The baseline clinical data was combined with candidate peptides biomarkers in additional random forest models and this revealed improved model performance.

Conclusion: Data from 2 complimentary proteomic approaches was subjected to univariate and multivariate machine learning statistical analysis which revealed a total of 103 candidate biomarker peptides corresponding with 69 proteins that can potentially discriminate PsA patients who will progress to radiographic damage from those who will not. Random forest models produced convincing ROC AUCs which were improved by inclusion of patient clinical baseline data. The data, whilst promising, requires further validation using separate cohorts of similar patient samples.

References


Disclosures: O. Coleman, Atturos, 3; B. Wundervald, Atturos, 7; R. Zhou, Atturos, 3; J. Waddington, Atturos Ltd, 3; R. Graham, None; C. Graham, None; G. McMullan, None; A. Parnell, Atturos, 11; V. Chandran, Abbvie, 1, 2, 5, Amgen, 1, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Janssen, 1, 2, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 12, Spousal employment, Celgene, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5; P. Mease, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Genentech, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Gilead Sciences, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 6, GSK, 2; G. Gallo, Eli Lilly and Company, 3; V. Krishnan, Eli Lilly and Company, 3, 11; S. Pennington, Atturos, 4, 8, 10, 11; O. FitzGerald, Novartis, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, BMS, 5, 6, AbbVie, 5, 6, Janssen, 5, 6, Lilly, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Coleman O, Wundervald B, Zhou R, Waddington J, Graham R, Graham C, McMullan G, Parnell A, Chandran V, Mease P, Gallo G, Krishnan V, Pennington S, FitzGerald O. Identification of Serum Protein Biomarkers at Baseline to Distinguish Radiographic Progressors from Non-Progressors in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identification-of-serum-protein-biomarkers-at-baseline-to-distinguish-radiographic-progressors-from-non-progressors-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identification-of-serum-protein-biomarkers-at-baseline-to-distinguish-radiographic-progressors-from-non-progressors-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology