ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0923

Identification of Cell-Specific DNA Methylation Changes Associated with MTX Treatment Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Cameron Adams1, Nisha Nair2, Hong Quach1, Diana Quach1, Joanne Nititham3, Mary Nakamura4, Jonathan Graf5, Lindsey Criswell6 and Lisa Barcellos7, 1University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 4UCSF/SFVAHCS, San Francisco, CA, 5Ucsf, San Francisco, CA, 6National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, 7School of Public Health, UC Berkeley; National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Berkeley, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Epigenetics, Response Criteria, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: RA – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: MTX is the recommended first treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, only ~40% respond adequately to MTX. Significant joint damage can occur in the early phase of RA, and response to the first treatment is an indicator of long-term prognosis. Changes in DNA methylation (DNAm) associated with response to these treatments are potential biomarkers for prediction of treatment response.

Methods: We estimated changes in cell-specific DNAm associated with MTX response from whole blood samples collected from RA patients before and after initiation of MTX treatment. Patients included in this study were from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study (RAMS) and University of California, San Francisco Rheumatoid Arthritis study (UCSF-RA) (Total n=77). All patients met the ACR RA criteria. Blood samples were collected at baseline and after treatment (UCSF-RA: 3-6 months, RAMS: 4 weeks). DAS28-CRP was collected at baseline and after 3-6 months of treatment. Genome-wide methylation profiles were generated with Illumina 450K (RAMS) and EPIC BeadChips (UCSF-RA) from whole blood. Functional normalization and background subtraction with dye-bias normalization and other QC procedures were performed using minfi. Differences between 450K and EPIC platforms were adjusted using Harman. MTX response was defined using the EULAR criteria for DAS28-CRP (Responder: good/moderate response, Non-responder: no response). Differentially methylated positions (DMPs) were identified using limma and Tensor Composition Analysis (TCA). TCA is a method for identifying cell-specific differential DNAm at the CpG level from bulk tissue. B cells, CD4 and CD8 T cells, monocytes, neutrophils, and Natural Killer (NK) cells were included in cell-specific analyses. Linear models evaluated differential DNAm between MTX response groups over time and within each time point. Sex, age, smoking history, estimated global cell-proportions, and batch were included as covariates. Differentially Methylated Regions (DMRs) were identified using Comb-p.

Results: We found evidence for differential global methylation between response groups after treatment (Figure 1). Further, we found patterns of cell-specific differential global methylation associated with MTX response (Figure 2). One DMP was associated at genome wide significance with differential DNAm between responders and non-responders at baseline in CD4T, CD8T, and NK cells (Table 1). Additionally, we identified 39 cell-specific DMRs associated with MTX response. There were no significant findings in whole blood analyses.

Conclusion: We identified cell-specific changes in DNAm associated with MTX response in RA patients. Future studies into DNAm and MTX response should include measurements of DNAm from sorted cells.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Differences in global methylation between MTX responders and non-responders at baseline and after treatment.

Supporting image 2

Figure 2. Global DNA methylation (DNAm) estimated in TCA models. Abbreviations: R, EULAR treatment responders; NR, EULAR treatment non-responders; T0, baseline visit DNAm; T1 follow-up visit DNAm.

Supporting image 3

Table 1. Top Tensor Composition Analysis DMP results.


Disclosures: C. Adams, None; N. Nair, None; H. Quach, None; D. Quach, None; J. Nititham, None; M. Nakamura, Moderna; J. Graf, Sonoma Biotherapeutics; L. Criswell, None; L. Barcellos, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Adams C, Nair N, Quach H, Quach D, Nititham J, Nakamura M, Graf J, Criswell L, Barcellos L. Identification of Cell-Specific DNA Methylation Changes Associated with MTX Treatment Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identification-of-cell-specific-dna-methylation-changes-associated-with-mtx-treatment-response-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identification-of-cell-specific-dna-methylation-changes-associated-with-mtx-treatment-response-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology