ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1725

Higher Prevalence of Aspirin Use with a Specific Educational Tool in SLE Pregnancies: Preliminary Results

Joo Young (Esther) Lee1, Arielle Mendel2, Isabelle Malhamé2, Sasha Bernatsky1 and Evelyne Vinet3, 1McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada, 3McGill University Health Centre, Mont Royal, QC, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: education, patient, Patient reported outcomes, pregnancy, prevention, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster (1711–1731)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Pregnant women with SLE are at substantial risk of preeclampsia. Best international practice guidelines recommend aspirin (ASA) in this population, as it reduces preeclampsia risk by more than 50% in high-risk women. However, recent evidence suggests that only 25% of pregnant SLE women use ASA. It is therefore imperative to understand ASA use patterns in SLE pregnancies to promote ASA adherence. With this objective, we are conducting the PREPARE (PREeclamPsia knowledge & Aspirin adheRence in lupus prEgnancies) trial, a randomized controlled trial, evaluating a specifically-designed educational tool. In this analysis, we aimed to assess ASA use, adherence, and dosage at baseline and 2nd study visits according to the intervention status.

Methods: Since 2018, we are recruiting consecutive pregnant SLE women (diagnosed according to the SLICC criteria) until the 16th gestational week at 5 Canadian centers. Participants are randomly assigned to receive the educational tool (intervention) or standard of care (control). At baseline (i.e. 1st trimester) and 2nd visits (i.e. 2nd trimester, 20-24 weeks, for ongoing pregnancies or 4-8 weeks after end of pregnancy for women who miscarried), the participants complete self-reported ASA adherence questionnaires and the modified Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS), scored out of 44 (lower score meaning better adherence). We defined the participants ‘ASA users’ if they were using ASA in ongoing pregnancies or if they had used ASA but had a miscarriage. Current analysis includes participants enrolled at the coordinating center (accounting for nearly half of the total planned sample size). We measured the proportion of ASA users, mean ARMS scores, and dosage at both visits. We estimated a 95% CI for difference in proportion of ASA users between the groups using the Wilson procedure and mean ARMS score difference between the groups using the Student’s t test.

Results: Thirty-three participants were included, 16 exposed to the intervention and 17 controls. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced with mean age of 32.2 years (standard deviation, SD, 4.6) in the intervention and 34.1 years (SD, 4.2) in the control group, and an identical proportion of participants who had post-secondary education (i.e. 80%) (Table 1). Baseline mean gestational age was 61.6 days (SD, 19.4) and 61.2 days (SD, 21.4) and baseline ASA use prevalence was 56% and 41% in the intervention and control group, respectively. Proportion of ASA users at the 2nd visit was 100% in the intervention and 82% in the control group, with a difference of 18% (95% CI -5, 41). At the 2nd visit, mean ARMS score was not different in the intervention (12.4 points) and control (12.2 points) groups [difference of 0.3 points (95% CI -0.8, 1.3)]. Among ASA users at the 2nd visit, 6% and 14% used 80-81mg, and 75% and 71% used 160-162mg in the intervention and control group, respectively.

Conclusion: Halfway into the trial, we observed a trend for higher ASA use in pregnant SLE women who received a specifically-designed educational tool compared to those receiving standard of care. The PREPARE trial is on track to provide a new evidence-based approach to optimize aspirin use and potentially improve outcomes in this population.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics in the study population.


Disclosures: J. Lee, None; A. Mendel, None; I. Malhamé, None; S. Bernatsky, None; E. Vinet, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lee J, Mendel A, Malhamé I, Bernatsky S, Vinet E. Higher Prevalence of Aspirin Use with a Specific Educational Tool in SLE Pregnancies: Preliminary Results [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/higher-prevalence-of-aspirin-use-with-a-specific-educational-tool-in-sle-pregnancies-preliminary-results/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/higher-prevalence-of-aspirin-use-with-a-specific-educational-tool-in-sle-pregnancies-preliminary-results/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology