ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 721

Geographic Differences in Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Standard of Care in Multinational Studies of Patients with Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Richard Furie1, M Khamashta2, L Wang3, J Drappa3, W Greth3 and G Illei3, 1Division of Rheumatology, North Shore - LIJ Health System, New York, NY, 2Graham Hughes Lupus Research Laboratory, The Rayne Institute, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 3MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: interferons, monoclonal antibodies and randomized trials, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Most
randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
include stratification factors to ensure a balanced allocation of subgroups
that might respond differently to therapeutic interventions. Strata could
include baseline disease activity, baseline corticosteroid dosage, or race.
Despite such stratification, geographic differences have influenced responses
in some studies. Sifalimumab and anifrolumab, fully human, IgG1 κ
monoclonal antibodies, have each been investigated in Phase II studies in SLE
(NCT01283139 and NCT01438489). Sifalimumab binds to and neutralizes the
majority of IFN-α subtypes, while anifrolumab binds to the type I IFN receptor
and thus prevents signaling by any of the type I IFNs. This study analyzed
potentially impactful differences in baseline characteristics between
geographic regions.

Methods: This
post-hoc analysis first combined data from the two studies and then
compared the baseline characteristics of the region with an expected high placebo
plus standard of care response rate (Region 1 [R1]: Central America, South
America, Eastern Europe, Asia) to those of the region with an expected low
placebo plus standard of care response rate (Region 2 [R2]: North America,
Western Europe, South Africa). Eligibility criteria, similar for the two studies,
resulted in the enrollment of patients with moderate to severe SLE with
inadequate responses to standard of care. Patients with severely active lupus
nephritis or severe neuropsychiatric SLE were excluded.

Results: Of
the 736 randomized and dosed patients, 68.9% were from R1, and 31.1% were from
R2. There were no significant baseline differences between regions in mean SLEDAI-2K,
BILAG 2004 composite, or Physician’s Global Assessment scores. However,
differences were seen in other clinical characteristics as well as demographic and
background medication use (table).

Conclusion: SLE
patients enrolled in RCTs from different geographic regions had notable
differences in some demographic and baseline clinical characteristics as well
as in standard of care medications. These differences may impact the analysis
of the treatment response to standard of care and/or investigational drug.
Therefore, the possibility of an imbalance in patients recruited from regions
with expected high or low standard of care response should be considered in the
design of SLE RCTs.

 

Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Standard of Care Medications

 

 

Region 1

(N=507)

Region 2

(N=229)

P-value

 

Age, years, mean (SD)

38.0 (11.8)

43.0 (11.4)

<0.001

Body mass index, kg/m2, mean (SD)

25.2 (5.0)

28.1 (7.3)

<0.001

Disease duration, months, mean (SD)

81.8 (75.8)

131.2 (92.4)

<0.001

SLICC/ACR Damage Index, mean (SD)

0.5 (0.9)

1.1 (1.5)

<0.001

Double-stranded DNA antibodies, %

85.0

67.3

<0.001

Hypocomplementemia, %

 

 

 

  C3

44.8

33.6

0.005

  C4

29.0

18.3

0.002

Background medications, %

 

 

 

  Azathioprine

28.8

12.2

<0.001

  Mycophenolate

5.1

21.0

<0.001

  Corticosteroids

94.1

65.1

<0.001

  Prednisone (or equivalent) ≥10 mg/d

66.9

36.7

<0.001

ACR, American College of Rheumatology; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; SD, standard deviation; SLICC, Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics

P-values calculated using 2 sample t-test for comparison of means and chi-square test for comparison of percentages.

 

Acknowledgements:
Funded:
MedImmune. Editorial Assistance: K Alexander, QXV
Comms, an Ashfield business, UK


Disclosure: R. Furie, MedImmune, 2,MedImmune, 5; M. Khamashta, Bayer, 2,INOVA diagnostics, Medimmune, GSK, UCB, 5; L. Wang, AstraZeneca, 1,MedImmune, 3; J. Drappa, Medimmune, 3; W. Greth, MedImmune/AstraZeneca, 1; G. Illei, AstraZeneca, 1,MedImmune, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Furie R, Khamashta M, Wang L, Drappa J, Greth W, Illei G. Geographic Differences in Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Standard of Care in Multinational Studies of Patients with Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/geographic-differences-in-demographics-clinical-characteristics-and-standard-of-care-in-multinational-studies-of-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/geographic-differences-in-demographics-clinical-characteristics-and-standard-of-care-in-multinational-studies-of-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology