ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0141

Filgotinib Improved Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results from FINCH-1 Study

Zobair Younossi1, Maria Stepanova2, Lynn Gerber1, Susan Lee3, Hao Hu3, Thijs Hendrikx4, Annelies Boonen5, David Walker6, Rieke Alten7 and Bernard Combe8, 1Betty and Guy Beatty Center for Integrated Research, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, 2Center for Outcomes Research in Liver Disease, Washington, DC, 3Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, 4Galapagos BV, Leiden, Netherlands, 5Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 6Northumbria Healthcare Trust, North Shields, United Kingdom, 7Schlosspark-Klinik, Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, 8University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: clinical trial, Patient reported outcomes, rheumatoid arthritis, work

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster I: RA, Spondyloarthritis, & OA

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Filgotinib (FIL) is a potent oral selective janus kinase 1 inhibitor which is currently being investigated as an agent to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the FINCH 1 study (NCT02889796), FIL in combination with methotrexate (MTX) provided a rapid and meaningful clinical response in patients with inadequate response to MTX. Chronic inflammatory diseases such as RA substantially affects a broad range of aspects of the patient’s health related quality of life including work participation.1 The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to evaluate the rate and magnitude of change from baseline and assess the effect of treatment response on work productivity and activity scores in RA patients from the FINCH 1 study.

Methods: Patients with active RA were randomized to receive FIL 200 mg (n=475), FIL 100 mg (n=480), or subcutaneous adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg (n=325), or PBO (n=475) with concomitant MTX treatment in all groups for up to 52 weeks. At week 24, patients receiving PBO were randomized 1:1 to FIL 200 mg or 100 mg. The activity impairment, work productivity impairment, presenteeism, and absenteeism in the past 7 days were evaluated at baseline and then at weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 on treatment, using the self-administered 6-item Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Rheumatoid Arthritis (WPAI:RA). (employed patients only) The 4 subscale scores ranged from 0%-100%, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. changes from baseline in WPAI: RA score were analyzed using mixed effect models for repeated measures (MMRM), and missing data were not imputed. All analyses were exploratory without multiplicity adjustment, and nominal P values are reported.

Results: The baseline demographics were relatively consistent across all treatment arms. Patients were (mean + SD) 35 + 13 years old, 82% female and 40% employed. Statistically significantly greater improvement in WPAI scores from baseline compared to PBO was reported as early as week 4 with FIL 200 mg, and week 12 with FIL 100 mg for work productivity, presenteeism, and activity (Table 1). At 24 weeks, both doses of FIL resulted in 21.5-24.4% improvement in work productivity and presenteeism compared to 11.4-14.7% in PBO. Similarly, both doses of FIL improved activity impairment score by 31% from baseline compared to 21.7% in PBO. Improvement over baseline persisted throughout treatment until week 52 for both FIL doses. WPAI scores were similar for both FIL doses and ADA throughout the study.

Conclusion: Improvement in overall work productivity, presenteeism, and daily activity was greater with both doses of FIL in combination with MTX compared to PBO + MTX in RA patients who had inadequate response to MTX.

Reference:

  1. Kim et al. J Rheumatol. 2017;44(8):1112-1117.


Disclosure: Z. Younossi, Gilead, 5, Terns, 5, Viking, 5, Intercept, 5, Novo Nordisk, 5, Merck, 5, Abbvie, 5, Novartis, 5, BMS, 5, Shionogi, 5, Siemens, 5; M. Stepanova, None; L. Gerber, None; S. Lee, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3; H. Hu, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 1, 3; T. Hendrikx, Galapagos, 1, 3; A. Boonen, AbbVie, 2, Galapagos, 5, Lilly, 5, Celgene, 2, UC, 5; D. Walker, Gilead, 2, 5, Lilly, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8; R. Alten, Pfizer, 2, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, Novartis, 2, AbbVie, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; B. Combe, AbbVie, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, 8, Roche-Chugai, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, Pfizer, 2, 8, MSD, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Younossi Z, Stepanova M, Gerber L, Lee S, Hu H, Hendrikx T, Boonen A, Walker D, Alten R, Combe B. Filgotinib Improved Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results from FINCH-1 Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/filgotinib-improved-work-productivity-and-activity-impairment-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-inadequate-response-to-methotrexate-results-from-finch-1-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/filgotinib-improved-work-productivity-and-activity-impairment-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-inadequate-response-to-methotrexate-results-from-finch-1-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology