ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1827

Factors That Impact Work Productivity in the Preserve Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Combination Etanercept-Methotrexate Therapy in Patients with Moderately Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Vibeke Strand1, Thomas V. Jones2, Wenzhi Li3, Andrew S. Koenig4 and Sameer Kotak5, 1Adjunct, Division of Immunology / Rheumatology, Stanford University, Portola Valley, CA, 2Inflammation Specialty Care, Pfizer, Inc, Collegeville, PA, 3Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, 4Specialty Care Business Unit, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, 5Specialty Care, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biologic response modifiers, methotrexate (MTX), rheumatoid arthritis, treatment and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services Research: Rheumatic Disease Pharmacoepidemiology

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Active joint inflammation and structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often result in impaired physical function and ultimately work disability.1,2 Lost productivity is associated with higher costs than direct expenditures in determining overall RA costs.3 In a recent multinational database study, more than one third of patients working at the time of onset of RA symptoms reported work disability.2 In a 2006 systematic review, two thirds of employed RA patients reported RA-related loss of productivity in the prior year.4 Despite advances in RA treatment, work disability remains a persistent problem. The objective of the analysis presented here was to assess predictors of impairment in work productivity in patients with moderately active RA (3.2Methods: Patients achieving DAS28 low disease activity (DAS28 ≤3.2, avg wk 12–36 and at wk 36) following 36 wks of open-label treatment with etanercept (ETN) 50 mg QW + methotrexate (MTX; E50/M) were randomized to receive E50/M (n=202), ETN 25 mg QW + MTX (E25/M; n=202), or ETN placebo + MTX (P/M; n=200) as double-blind treatment for 52 wks. The Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Rheumatoid Arthritis (WPAI:RA) was administered at baseline (BL) and wk 88, after double-blind treatment. Correlation (Pearson’s r) and linear regression analyses were conducted: the dependent variable was % of overall work impairment in WPAI:RA; independent variables were age, gender, and RA duration at BL, and HAQ score ≤0.5 vs >0.5, PtGA of disease activity, pain score, FACIT-Fatigue score, WPAI:RA score, and treatment at wk 36.

Results: No significant association was observed between patients’ age and gender at BL or pain or FACIT-Fatigue scores at wk 36 and % overall work impairment at wk 88 (table). In contrast, disease duration at BL as well as HAQ score >0.5, PtGA of disease activity, and WPAI:RA score at wk 36 were significant predictors of work impairment (P<0.05). After controlling for other factors, in comparison with P/M, E50/M provided greater benefit in improving work productivity at wk 88 (P<0.05), whereas E25/M did not.

 

Conclusion: Disease duration, HAQ score >0.5, PtGA, and work impairment at baseline were significant predictors of work impairment at end of the study in this population of patients with moderately active RA. Significant improvement in the overall percentage of work productivity was evident in patients receiving etanercept 50 mg plus methotrexate compared with placebo plus methotrexate.

References:  1. Verstappen SMM, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:488–97. 2. Sokka T, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:R42. 3. Ruof J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:544–50. 4. Burton W, et al. Occup Med. 2006;56:18–27.


Disclosure:

V. Strand,

Pfizer Inc,

5;

T. V. Jones,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

W. Li,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

A. S. Koenig,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

S. Kotak,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/factors-that-impact-work-productivity-in-the-preserve-trial-a-randomized-controlled-trial-of-combination-etanercept-methotrexate-therapy-in-patients-with-moderately-active-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology