ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2292

Factors Affecting The Discrepancy Between Physician and Patient Global Assessment Of Disease Activity In Early and Established Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients- Results From The Ontario Best Practices Initiative

Pooneh Akhavan1, Binu Jacob2, Edward C. Keystone3,4, Xiuying Li5, J. Carter Thorne6 and Claire Bombardier7, 1Medicine, Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Program, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2University Health Network, Toronto General Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis and Autoimmune Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4University of Toronto/Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Clinical Decision Making and Health Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada, 7Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disability, Outcome measures, Prognostic factors and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis-Clinical Aspects III: Outcome Measures, Socioeconomy, Screening, Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Discrepancy between patient (PGA) and physician (MDGA) global assessments in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) can adversely affect therapeutic decisions. The pattern of PGA and MDGA, factors influencing each and the discrepancy between the two may be different in patients with established disease compare to patients with early disease. The objective of this study was to assess the pattern of PGA-MDGA discrepancy in early and established RA and to identify predictors of this discrepancy in the two patient populations.

Methods: Patients with RA were recruited from the Ontario Best Practice Initiative (OBRI), a clinical registry of RA patients followed in routine care. PGA and MDGA were scored from 0-100. PGA-MDGA discrepancy was calculated by subtracting MDGA from PGA at baseline. A clinically meaningful discrepancy was considered a difference of  ≥30 (PGA-MDGA > 30: Positive (Pos) and PGA-MDGA < -30: Negative (Neg)). The rate of discrepancy was determined in patients with disease duration of less than or equal to 12 months (early RA) and disease duration of greater than 5 years (established RA) at baseline. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with MDGA, PGA and the PGA-MDGA discrepancy when adjusted for potential confounders including patient demographics, ESR, swollen joint count (SJC), tender joint count (TJC), pain, RF and anti-CCP and joint damage in both early and established disease.

Results: : 439 early and 737 established RA patients were analyzed with the mean age of 57.0 and 59.0 years and DAS28 of 4.7 and 4.5 respectively. Mean PGA was 50.0 and 53.0 and MDGA was 48.0 and 43.0 in early and established groups respectively. A meaningful PGA-MDG discrepancy was found in182 (41%) early (101 positive and 81 negative) and 309 (42%) established (229 positive and 80 negative) RA. Regression analysis showed that there was a significant association between MDGA and pain, TJC, SJC and ESR at baseline in both groups and pain score was the only predictor of PGA. PGA-MDGA discrepancy was associated with pain (p<.0001), TJC (p=0.0014), SJC (p=0.004) and ESR (p=0.01) in early RA and was associated with pain (p<.0001), TJC (p=0.002), SJC(p<.0001) and age (p=0.05) in patients with established disease (Table). In both groups higher pain score, SJC or TJC would increase the discrepancy. Higher pain score would increase the positive discrepancy (PGA>MDGA) whereas SJC, TJC and ESR (only in early RA) would increase the negative discrepancy (MDGA>PGA).

Conclusion: PGA-MDGA discrepancy exists in a significant portion of RA patients irrespective of their disease duration. Pain score and active joints are the main clinical factors affecting this discrepancy in patients with either early or established disease.

Table- Multivariate analysis assessing predictors of PGA- MDGA discrepancy in patient with early and established RA

Predictors

Early RA

Established RA

β

p-value

β

p-value

Age

0.07

0.51

0.17

0.05

Female

-2.83

0.38

-2.75

0.25

TJC

-0.90

0.001

-0.63

0.002

SJC

-1.00

0.004

-1.85

<0.0001

ESR

-0.15

0.01

-0.05

0.23

Pain score

6.68

<.0001

6.03

<.0001

RF positive

-0.10

0.29

-0.03

0.35

Anti-CCP positive

-0.03

0.33

-0.02

0.40

Joint damage

-2.26

0.33

-0.03

0.98

Education

0.89

0.68

2.21

0.17


Disclosure:

P. Akhavan,
None;

B. Jacob,

OBRI,

2;

E. C. Keystone,
None;

X. Li,
None;

J. C. Thorne,
None;

C. Bombardier,

OBRI,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/factors-affecting-the-discrepancy-between-physician-and-patient-global-assessment-of-disease-activity-in-early-and-established-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-results-from-the-ontario-best-practices-in/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology