ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1922

Exploration of patient and clinician perspectives on rehabilitation in contemporary rheumatology care for rheumatoid arthritis: A qualitative study

Joel Thompson1, Sharita Thomas2, Jason Sharpe3, Kelli Allen4, Beth Jonas5, Patti Katz6 and Louise Thoma7, 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cary, NC, 2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 3Flatiron Health, Durham, NC, 4University of North Carolina, Durham, NC, 5University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 6UCSF, San Rafael, CA, 7University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Disability, physical therapy, Qualitative Research, Rehabilitation, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (1914–1935) Health Services Research Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently experience functional deficits, disability, and reduced participation in meaningful activities despite improved medical management. Rehabilitation services, including physical therapy and occupational therapy, can address functional challenges, but referral rates and utilization remain low in the United States. The decision-making processes under which rehabilitation is considered and implemented are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of patients, rheumatologists, and physical therapists regarding the use of rehabilitation for adults with RA.

Methods: This qualitative study used one-on-one semi-structured interviews with adults diagnosed with RA, rheumatologists, and physical therapists. Purposive sampling was employed to recruit participants with diverse experiences. For patients we sampled for a range of functional levels and prior experience with rehabilitation, while for clinicians we sampled for a range of usual practice with physical therapy for patients with RA. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a mixed deductive and inductive coding approach. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted to identify and refine key themes related to rehabilitation utilization and integration into routine RA care.

Results: Twenty-four patients with RA, six rheumatologists, and six physical therapists were interviewed. Four themes emerged that illustrate barriers to effective integration of rehabilitation into RA care (Table 1): (1) Need for Rehabilitation, (2) Discussion of Rehabilitation, (3) Interprofessional Collaboration and Training Challenges, and (4) Utilization of Rehabilitation. Rheumatologists often prioritized pharmacological management and reserved rehabilitation until later disease stages or severe functional decline, while patients frequently reported a desire for earlier, preventative rehabilitation. Both clinicians and patients reported limited discussions regarding rehabilitation and barriers to utilization. Knowledge gaps, challenges in interprofessional communication, uncertainty about appropriate referral processes among rheumatologists, and limited exposure to rheumatology care among physical therapists also impeded integration.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight a disconnect between patient needs and current clinical practice regarding rehabilitation in RA care. Addressing patient and clinician knowledge gaps, improving interprofessional communication, and developing clear referral pathways may support more effective integration of rehabilitation services and better align care with patient priorities. Future efforts should prioritize the development of educational interventions and care models that facilitate timely, patient-centered access to rehabilitation as part of comprehensive RA care.

Supporting image 1


Disclosures: J. Thompson: None; S. Thomas: None; J. Sharpe: Flatiron Health, 3; K. Allen: None; B. Jonas: None; P. Katz: None; L. Thoma: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Thompson J, Thomas S, Sharpe J, Allen K, Jonas B, Katz P, Thoma L. Exploration of patient and clinician perspectives on rehabilitation in contemporary rheumatology care for rheumatoid arthritis: A qualitative study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/exploration-of-patient-and-clinician-perspectives-on-rehabilitation-in-contemporary-rheumatology-care-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-qualitative-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/exploration-of-patient-and-clinician-perspectives-on-rehabilitation-in-contemporary-rheumatology-care-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-qualitative-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology