ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1860

Evaluation of the Receipt of Adequate Pharmacological and Psychological Treatment for Incident Depression and Anxiety in Individuals Living with Inflammatory Arthritis

Alyssa Howren1, Eric Sayre2, J. Antonio Avina-Zubieta3, Joseph Puyat1, Deborah Da Costa4, Hui Xie5, Amit Gupta1 and Mary De Vera1, 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4McGill University, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada, 5Simon Fraser University, Richmond, BC, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Health Services Research, mental health, Psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (1840–1861) Health Services Research Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To describe patterns of pharmacological and psychological treatment and evaluate the receipt of minimally adequate treatment for incident depression and anxiety in individuals with inflammatory arthritis (IA), specifically ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: Our cohort study used population-based linked administrative health databases from Population Data BC to identify individuals (≥18 years)with IA and IA-free controls matched on age, sex, and incident depression or anxiety. We assessed mental health treatment in the first year following incident depression or anxiety and pharmacological treatments were identified using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes for antidepressants and anxiolytics. Psychological treatments were identified using fee-item codes that included publicly funded counselling, psychotherapy, and psychiatrist visits. We defined minimally adequate pharmacological treatment as antidepressant prescriptions filled with ≥84 days of supply. We defined minimally adequate psychological treatment as the receipt of ≥4 counselling/psychotherapy services. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, income, and residence, were used to evaluate the odds of individuals with IA receiving minimally adequate pharmacological or psychological care for their incident depression or anxiety as compared to IA-free controls.

Results: Cases of incident depression were identified in 6,951 individuals with IA (mean age 54.8 ± 18.3 years, 65.5% female) and 6,951 IA-free controls (mean age 54.8 ± 18.3 years, 65.5% female). Incident anxiety was identified among 3,701 with IA (mean age 52.9 ± 16.8 years, 74.3% female) and 3,701 IA-free controls (mean age 52.9 ± 16.8 years, 74.3% female) (Table 1). More than half of the IA and control study sample with depression had ≥1 antidepressant prescription filled (IA 64.3%; controls 61.4%). Fewer individuals with IA and comorbid anxiety had ≥1 antidepressant (IA 58.5%, controls 54.2%) or ≥1 anxiolytic (IA 46.8%, controls 40.1%) prescription dispensed. The receipt of minimally adequate pharmacological and psychological treatment for depression was observed in 50.5% and 19.6% of those with IA, respectively, with no significant difference compared to controls (pharmacological: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90 to 1.13; psychological: aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.05). The proportion receiving minimally adequate pharmacological (IA 46.9%, controls 44.1%) and psychological (IA 20.2%, controls 19.0%) treatment for anxiety was also similar between individuals with IA and controls (pharmacological: aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.08; psychological: aOR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.18).

Conclusion: A large proportion of individuals with depression or anxiety were not receiving adequate care by means of medications and publicly funded mental health services, regardless of a comorbid IA diagnosis. Exploring methods for rheumatology to facilitate greater access to mental health care is imperative given the increased prevalence and negative impacts of depression and anxiety in this patient population.

Supporting image 1


Disclosures: A. Howren: None; E. Sayre: None; J. Avina-Zubieta: None; J. Puyat: None; D. Da Costa: None; H. Xie: None; A. Gupta: None; M. De Vera: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Howren A, Sayre E, Avina-Zubieta J, Puyat J, Da Costa D, Xie H, Gupta A, De Vera M. Evaluation of the Receipt of Adequate Pharmacological and Psychological Treatment for Incident Depression and Anxiety in Individuals Living with Inflammatory Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-receipt-of-adequate-pharmacological-and-psychological-treatment-for-incident-depression-and-anxiety-in-individuals-living-with-inflammatory-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-receipt-of-adequate-pharmacological-and-psychological-treatment-for-incident-depression-and-anxiety-in-individuals-living-with-inflammatory-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology