ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2609

Evaluation of the Performance of Candidate Enthesitis Ultrasound Scoring Systems for Psoriatic Arthritis Diagnosis – DUET Study

Nam Nguyen1, Mu Yang2, Sibel Aydin3, Gurjit Kaeley4, Richard Cook2 and Lihi Eder1, 1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, 3Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 4UF COM-J, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Imaging, Measurement Instrument, Psoriatic arthritis, Ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases (2609–2614)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-3:15PM

Background/Purpose: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is often diagnosed late, leading to worse outcomes. Enthesitis is a key feature that can aid in early detection, but its clinical assessment is unreliable. Ultrasound (US) offers a more objective method for evaluating enthesitis, yet standardization remains a challenge. The GRAPPA Ultrasound Working Group is developing the Diagnostic Ultrasound Enthesitis Tool (DUET), a PsA-specific sonographic enthesitis scoring system to distinguish PsA from non-inflammatory conditions. While DUET has been derived from a discovery cohort, external validation is needed before its clinical adoption. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the discriminative ability of candidate DUET scores using independent data to inform the selection of a DUET scoring system.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed US scans from PsA patients and non-psoriatic controls collected in a single centre following standard protocol. All PsA patient met the DUET enrollment criteria including PsA duration < 5 years and were not using biologics. Controls had no psoriasis or other autoimmune disease. Enthesis US scans of the quadriceps, proximal and distal patellar tendons, triceps and Achilles were scored by a single reader blinded to the diagnosis for entheseal elementary lesions including hypoechogenicity, thickening, Doppler signal, enthesophytes, calcifications and erosions. We evaluated seven candidate DUET scores, each incorporating different combinations of entheseal sites and elementary lesions. Models were refitted using coefficients estimated in the discovery cohort. Model performance was also stratified by age group.

Results: In our validation cohort of 102 PsA patients and 69 controls, the seven candidate DUET risk scores yielded areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.660 to 0.764 (Figure 1). Stratifying the risk scores by age with a cutoff of 55 years enhanced AUCs to 0.781 (under 55) and 0.753 (over 55) (Figure 2).

Conclusion: The candidate DUET scores demonstrated discriminative ability in an external validation cohort, with additional improvement following age stratification. These findings will guide further refinement of the selected DUET score and inform its integration into clinical and research settings.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. ROC curve of candidate DUET scores

Supporting image 2Figure 2. Discriminative ability of candidate DUET scores stratified by age groups


Disclosures: N. Nguyen: None; M. Yang: None; S. Aydin: AbbVie/Abbott, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Janssen, 5, 6, Novartis, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6; G. Kaeley: AbbVie/Abbott, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Gilead, 5, Janssen, 5, Novartis, 5; R. Cook: None; L. Eder: AbbVie, 1, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 1, 2, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, 6, Fresenius Kabi, 1, 5, J&J, 1, 2, 5, Janssen, 1, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, UCB, 1, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nguyen N, Yang M, Aydin S, Kaeley G, Cook R, Eder L. Evaluation of the Performance of Candidate Enthesitis Ultrasound Scoring Systems for Psoriatic Arthritis Diagnosis – DUET Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-performance-of-candidate-enthesitis-ultrasound-scoring-systems-for-psoriatic-arthritis-diagnosis-duet-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-performance-of-candidate-enthesitis-ultrasound-scoring-systems-for-psoriatic-arthritis-diagnosis-duet-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology