ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0174

Evaluation of Healthcare Utilization in Members with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Jean Park, W. Cliff Rutter, Elisea Avalos-Reyes, Chen Liu, Will Cavers, Dorothea Verbrugge and Kjel Johnson, CVS Health, Woonsocket, RI

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Access to care, Health Services Research, Psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0155–0175) Health Services Research Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Healthcare utilization is increasing among patients with rheumatic diseases. While several studies have assessed healthcare utilization in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, few studies have assessed utilization among psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. The objective of this study was to examine healthcare utilization trends among patients with RA, PsA, or SLE.

Methods: This was a cohort study of fully insured commercial or Medicare members of a large national health plan between 1/1/2018 and 1/1/2023. Members ≥ 18 years old were included if they had at least 2 visits for RA (ICD-10 code: M05 or M06), PsA (L40.5), or SLE (M32) during the study period. Members were excluded if they did not maintain continuous eligibility for 6 months before or after entrance into the study, had multiple conditions of interest, or had missing socioeconomic status (SES) data. Healthcare utilization metrics were examined as use of telemedicine, emergency room (ER), or inpatient services and were identified by place of service codes on medical claims. ER and inpatient claims were aggregated by day and are presented by days utilizing the service. Utilization rates were calculated based on total person years observed in each cohort and the sum of telemedicine claims. ER days and inpatient days are presented as claims or days per 100 person years observed. Rate differences and rate ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI) with direct bivariable cohort comparisons. Continuous variables were assessed with analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests; categorical variables were assessed with the Chi2 test. P-values < 0.05 are significant, except for cohort comparisons of rate ratios, where the Bonferroni correction was applied and p< 0.005 is considered significant.

Results: Of the 109,006 members included in this study, 80,724 (74.1%) had RA, 15,122 (13.9%) had SLE, and 13,160 (12.1%) had PsA. Table 1 demonstrates significant differences in baseline demographics between disease states, with RA members being older (mean age (standard deviation (SD)): 59.6 (15.2) vs. 53.7 (13.7) and 51.2 (15.7) years in PsA and SLE members, respectively; p< 0.001) and having more comorbidities at baseline (mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (SD): 3.3 (2.8) vs. 1.7 (2.4) and 3 (2.6) in PsA and SLE members, respectively; p< 0.001). Tables 2 and 3 demonstrate the differences in healthcare utilization between disease states. In general, SLE members utilized all healthcare services more than PsA and RA members, except for inpatient services compared to RA members (rate ratio (95% CI): 0.973 (0.963-0.983); p< 0.005). Members with RA utilized ER and inpatient services significantly more than PsA members but utilized telemedicine services less (p< 0.005).

Conclusion: Members with SLE utilize significantly more healthcare services compared to RA and PsA members. In this current study it is not clear what other factors are influencing these utilization patterns. Further studies of healthcare utilization are needed in these patients.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Demographic characteristics

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Healthcare utilization by rheumatic condition

Supporting image 3

Table 3. Healthcare utilization rate ratios by rheumatic condition


Disclosures: J. Park: CVS Health, 3, 11; W. Rutter: CVS Health, 3, 11; E. Avalos-Reyes: AstraZeneca, 11, CVS Health, 3, 11, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 11, Haleon, 11, Johnson & Johnson, 11, Moderna, 11, Novavax, 11, Pfizer, 11, Viatris, 11; C. Liu: CVS Health, 3, 11; W. Cavers: Amedisys Inc, 11, Baxter, 11, Conmed Corp, 11, CVS Health, 3, 11; D. Verbrugge: CVS Health, 3, 4, 11; K. Johnson: CVS Health, 3, 4, 11, HC Technology Patent, 10.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Park J, Rutter W, Avalos-Reyes E, Liu C, Cavers W, Verbrugge D, Johnson K. Evaluation of Healthcare Utilization in Members with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-healthcare-utilization-in-members-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-psoriatic-arthritis-and-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-healthcare-utilization-in-members-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-psoriatic-arthritis-and-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology