ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1861

Evaluation of a Longstanding Telephone Peer Counseling Service on People with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Loved Ones

Priscilla Toral1, Melissa T. Flores1, Roberta Horton1 and Jillian Rose2, 1Social Work Programs, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Education, evaluation and mental health, Lupus, patient, Support and Education Groups

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: ARHP Education/Community Programs

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Studies show telephone peer support has been used to address a range of health concerns in people living with chronic illness. A phone evaluation was conducted with participants of a national toll-free phone peer counseling service. Ongoing since 1988, this service provides emotional support for people with SLE and their loved ones, by trained volunteers living with SLE. The evolution of this program has been presented at prior ACR/ARHP, including the impact of a revised curriculum on a new cohort of peer volunteers staffing the service.

Methods:

A 60-item survey, with Likert scale & open-ended questions was administered to callers who were matched with a peer-counselor between 2015-2017. The survey captured demographics, satisfaction with the screening process & their peer counselors, SLE management/ coping & overall service impact. Surveys were completed by phone interviews with a volunteer not directly connected to program.

Results:

Of the 32 users outreached to 23 (72%) completed the survey. The majority (89%) of respondents were female, 47% identified as Black/African-American, 35% White, 31% Hispanic &18% some other race. Callers’ ages ranged from 30-80, with 67% ages 40-59. Most respondents were unemployed (43%) & 39% employed part/full time. Almost half of the callers (47%) were married, 94% had SLE & diagnosed for ˃ 12 years. When asked about their initial reasons for calling 68% indicated emotional support & SLE education & resources (63 %). Most participants were satisfied (90%) with the screening call with the social worker. When asked about initial expectations of their first call, callers shared, “I wanted to know more about SLE” & “have someone to listen & guide me.” Most callers indicated their expectations were met (95%). Callers shared that having someone knowledgeable about SLE (72%) was the most valuable aspect of the call. Most callers (52%) had ˃ 12 calls with their peer counselor & 95% were satisfied (77% very; 18% moderately) with their match.

In relation to coping, 85% indicated that they have coped better with their SLE since being matched & 81% agreed they had a better understanding of SLE. 88% respectively attributed this to utilization of the program. When asked about depression 66% reported feeling less depressed since starting the service with a majority of callers (78%) crediting the service for this change. Callers also reported feeling less isolated (71 %) with 73% indicating this was also a result of the service. One caller shared, “I feel less alone.”

When asked if their communication & or relationship with their doctor improved since using the service 58% said yes & 100% indicated that the program was responsible for this. When asked about the single most helpful part of using the service responses included, “you know you can call the line & there is someone to listen” & “knowing support is a phone call away.” Most (94%) indicated they would recommend the service to others.

Conclusion:

Despite limitations due to a small sample size, results indicate continued satisfaction & positive impact, with slight increases since last evaluation. Results point to the continued relevance of a phone support service that is easily accessible & can connect people with SLE & their loved ones to support & resources.


Disclosure: P. Toral, None; M. T. Flores, None; R. Horton, None; J. Rose, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Toral P, Flores MT, Horton R, Rose J. Evaluation of a Longstanding Telephone Peer Counseling Service on People with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Loved Ones [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-a-longstanding-telephone-peer-counseling-service-on-people-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-their-loved-ones/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-a-longstanding-telephone-peer-counseling-service-on-people-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-their-loved-ones/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology