ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0186

Evaluating the Effectiveness & Impact of an In-Person Peer Support Group That Transitioned to a Virtual Platform During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Giselle Rodriguez1, Priscilla Calvache1, Lillian Mendez1, Kimberly Cabrera1, Roberta Horton1, Lisa Imundo2 and Jillian Rose-Smith1, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2New York Presbyterian Hospital - Columbia Campus, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Community programs, COVID-19, Disparities, Social support, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Patient Education/Community Programs Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Studies have demonstrated the benefits of online peer support forums in meeting the mental health, disease self-management & coping needs of people living with a chronic illness. An analysis of session evaluations was conducted for a monthly psychoeducation group, ongoing since 2001, for teens & young adults with SLE & their loved ones, focusing on the effectiveness of an in-person support group that transitioned to a virtual platform.

Methods: A 28-item online survey with Likert scale, multiple choice & open-ended questions was given after each of the 9 virtual groups from Sept. 2020 to June 2021. The bilingual groups provide support & education strategies to manage & cope with SLE. The groups focused on SLE-related topics, such as Medications, Nutrition, Pain Management & Research. A comparison analysis was completed assessing: reach, satisfaction, knowledge, coping & disease management for in-person groups held in 2018-2019.

Results: In 2020-2021 there were 203 surveys (54%) submitted vs. 159 (90%) surveys in 2018-2019. Most (79%) respondents identified as female, 20% male, 53% Hispanic, 49% African American, 19% White, 7% Asian & 25% other race. Similar demographics were noted when comparing participants for 2018-2019. There was an decrease in Hispanic participants by 11% & an increase in African American participants from 37% to 49% in 2020-2021. Regarding age distribution of respondents for 2020-2021, there were increases in reaching our target population (see figure 1).

Almost all (99%) respondents reported satisfaction with the virtual groups; 98% agreed that the groups increased their understanding of SLE-related issues; 93% agreed the groups helped them cope with SLE; 95% agreed they could apply what they learned to manage SLE; 98% agreed the program met their expectations & 97% agreed that they would recommend this group. No significant differences were noticed in the areas above when comparing in-person groups conducted in 2018-2019. There was an 8% increase when respondents were asked about the group’s ability to help them cope with SLE in the virtual group (see figure 2).

Reach increased significantly in the transition to a virtual group, with 373 participants vs. 177 in 2018-2019. Analysis of open-ended responses highlighted benefits of a virtual group including removing transportation barriers, ability to join the meeting from anywhere & ease of participation via sharing a link. When asked about the support group’s transition to a virtual space, one participant shared “I would not have been able to attend the meetings due to location”. Some limitations reported were inability to connect one on one, no internet access & challenges using Zoom.

Open-ended responses further reinforced similar impact of the virtual vs in-person model. Participants shared “I feel understood & not alone in my disease as there are more people like me suffering from an invisible illness.”

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the value of transitioning our peer support group to a virtual platform & its continued effectiveness & satisfaction. As things transition back to in-person, we will continue to assess our participants’ interest in a hybrid model utilizing both in-person & virtual groups to provide lupus support & education.

Supporting image 1

Age of respondents

Supporting image 2

Respondents Responses: satisfaction, knowledge, coping & disease management


Disclosures: G. Rodriguez, None; P. Calvache, None; L. Mendez, None; K. Cabrera, None; R. Horton, None; L. Imundo, None; J. Rose-Smith, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rodriguez G, Calvache P, Mendez L, Cabrera K, Horton R, Imundo L, Rose-Smith J. Evaluating the Effectiveness & Impact of an In-Person Peer Support Group That Transitioned to a Virtual Platform During the COVID-19 Pandemic [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluating-the-effectiveness-impact-of-an-in-person-peer-support-group-that-transitioned-to-a-virtual-platform-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluating-the-effectiveness-impact-of-an-in-person-peer-support-group-that-transitioned-to-a-virtual-platform-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology