ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L04

EP-104IAR (Extended-Release Fluticasone Propionate for Injectable Suspension): Topline and Key Secondary Results from a Phase 2 Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-Controlled Trial in Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis

James Helliwell1, Amanda Malone1, Mark Kowalski2, Asger Reinstrup Bihlet3, Claire Miller4, Alejandro Castillo Mondragon5, Yanqi Li6, Christine Dobek7, Vik Peck1, Mike Wilmink8 and Lee Simon9, 1Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, Winchester, VA, 3NBCD A/S, Soeborg, Denmark, 4NBCD A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5NBCD, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6NBCD A/S, Soborg, Denmark, 7Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 8OrthoArizona, Phoenix, AZ, 9SDG LLC, Cambridge, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Date of first publication: October 24, 2023

Keywords: clinical trial, corticosteroids, Late-Breaking 2023, OMERACT, Osteoarthritis, WOMAC

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: Late-Breaking Abstract Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: EP-104IAR is being developed to treat OA symptoms. Previous results from non-clinical studies evaluating local joint safety in beagle dogs, in contrast to other corticosteroid preparations, indicated that the prolonged local residence time of EP-104IAR had no impact on cartilage health.1 Safety and PK data from a Phase 1 trial in 24 OA knee patients were consistent with nonclinical findings and supported continued development of EP-104IAR.2 This report describes the results of a Phase 2b trial in subjects with Knee OA.

Methods: Subjects were randomized 1:1 to a single intraarticular dose of EP-104IAR 25 mg, or vehicle and followed for 24 weeks. Males and females, ≥40 years, with a diagnosis of primary knee OA, Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2-3 and symptoms (WOMAC Pain scores ≥ 4.0 to ≤9.0 (out of 10)) were enrolled. Subjects recorded weekly WOMAC Pain and monthly WOMAC Total measurements on a diary device. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, laboratory evaluations, and knee examinations. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline between treatments in WOMAC® Pain at Week 12.

Results: 318 subjects were dosed (163 EP-104IAR, 155 vehicle), median age = 64 years, 57.5% female. 68% had moderate OA pain (average baseline WOMAC Pain 3.5-6.5). Participants treated with EP-104IAR had significantly higher pain relief compared to vehicle in WOMAC Pain at Week 12 (change from baseline: -2.89 EP-104IAR, -2.23 vehicle; 95%CI -1.1, -0.2, p=0.004). This significant difference persisted until Week 14 in the full population and until Week 17 in subjects with moderate pain. A similar pattern was observed in the OMERACT-OARSI Strict Responders analysis: in allcomers % of OMERACT-OARSI Strict Responders was statistically different until Week 15 while in moderates there was statistical significance to Week 22 (both p< 0.05).Most AEs were mild/moderate. There were no EP-104IAR-related serious AEs or withdrawals. Mean serum cortisol and glucose values were similar in both treatment arms, no subjects developed adrenal insufficiency.

Conclusion: A single dose of EP-104IAR provided clinically and statistically significant pain relief for 14 weeks compared to vehicle. In subjects with moderate pain, significant pain-relief persisted for 17 weeks. Responder analyses in subjects with moderate pain demonstrated that clinically meaningful differences persisted for the majority of the study. This suggests EP‑104IAR could offer clinically meaningful and safe benefit for substantially longer than any other currently marketed corticosteroids.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: A) Least-squares mean change from baseline (and standard error) for the primary efficacy end point of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)-A (pain) (n = 318). B) Percent of patients classified as OMERACT-OARSI strict responders (OMERACT-OARSI strict responder defined as a subject with a greater than 2-point change from baseline and a 50% reduction in baseline pain) (n=318).

Supporting image 2

Figure 2: A) Least-squares mean change from baseline (and standard error) for the exploratory efficacy end point of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)-A (pain) in the moderate sub-population (n = 214). B) Percent of patients classified as OMERACT-OARSI strict responders (OMERACT-OARSI strict responder defined as a subject with a greater than 2-point change from baseline and a 50% reduction in baseline pain) in the moderate sub-population (n=214). Moderate was defined as having an average baseline WOMAC-A score on entry between 3.5-6.5. Patients who’s screening WOMAC-A scores were ≥4 but dropped below 4 on the day of injection were still eligible for the trial (potentially resulting in an average baseline pain <4).

Supporting image 3

Figure 3: A) Geometric Mean ± SE plasma fluticasone concentrations following a single injection of EP_104IAR (n=163 received EP_104IAR). Red line demarcates the average Cmax fluticasone concentrations with b.i.d. dosing of 880 µg Flovent HFA. B) Geometric Mean ± SE serum cortisol concentrations. Red line demarcates lower bound of normal cortisol range (n=318).


Disclosures: J. Helliwell: Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, 3, 4, 10, 11; A. Malone: Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, 3, 4, 8, 10, 11; M. Kowalski: Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, 3, 11; A. Bihlet: NBCD A/S, 3, 11; C. Miller: None; A. Mondragon: None; Y. Li: None; C. Dobek: Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, 3, 11; V. Peck: Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, 3, 11; M. Wilmink: Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals, 4, NextStep Arthropedix, 9; L. Simon: 150 companies, I consult for, 2, eupraxia, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Helliwell J, Malone A, Kowalski M, Bihlet A, Miller C, Mondragon A, Li Y, Dobek C, Peck V, Wilmink M, Simon L. EP-104IAR (Extended-Release Fluticasone Propionate for Injectable Suspension): Topline and Key Secondary Results from a Phase 2 Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-Controlled Trial in Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ep-104iar-extended-release-fluticasone-propionate-for-injectable-suspension-topline-and-key-secondary-results-from-a-phase-2-randomized-double-blind-vehicle-controlled-trial-in-subjects-with-knee/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ep-104iar-extended-release-fluticasone-propionate-for-injectable-suspension-topline-and-key-secondary-results-from-a-phase-2-randomized-double-blind-vehicle-controlled-trial-in-subjects-with-knee/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology