ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1813

Elucidating the Molecular Correlates of Treatment Response in Lupus Nephritis via Imaging Mass Cytometry Proteomics and Machine Learning

Frank Sen Hee Tay1, Anto Sam Crosslee Louis Sam Titus2, Vinaika Maruvada2, Sandy Lim1, Jiacai Cho1, Thomas Thamboo1 and Chandra Mohan3, 1National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, 2University of Houston, Houston, 3University of Houston, Houston, TX

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Bioinformatics, Lupus nephritis, proteomics

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: SLE – Etiology & Pathogenesis Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).  Despite the advances in the management of LN, its heterogenous nature poses challenges in predicting treatment response.  Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) offers a potential solution to dissect the heterogeneity of the treatment response by studying the spatial molecular architecture of LN.

Methods: In total, 47 glomerular and 45 tubulo-interstitial regions of interest (ROI) from 8 Class III, 8 Class IV LN and 3 renal cell carcinoma patients (RCC) were analyzed.  All SLE patients had their first kidney biopsy performed for diagnosis.  Glomerular ROIs were selected based on viable glomeruli on histopathological evaluation.  Normal adjacent tissue in nephrectomy samples from RCC patients was used for comparison.  Using a validated panel of metal-conjugated antibodies designed to include markers of major immune cell subsets, resident renal cells and several proteins known to be increased in LN kidneys, we performed simultaneous multiplex imaging with IMC for 35 target proteins.  Renal response was assessed at 12 months after induction therapy.  Unsupervised Bayesian network analysis (BNA) using the EQ algorithm was performed to determine the associated network with renal response in LN patients using BayesiaLab.

Results: There were increased glomerular, periglomerular and tubulo-interstitial immune infiltrates in LN kidneys compared to RCC controls.  Markers such as CD45RO (memory T cells and activated macrophages), HLA-DR (antigen presenting cells) and CD68 (macrophages) were increased in ROIs in LN compared to RCC.  Interestingly, there was increased glomerular/periglomerular collagen (collagen I and IV) deposition and fibrosis (fibronectin) in Class V compared to IV LN, despite similar chronicity indexes (Figure 1).  In terms of treatment response, glomerular (Figure 2) and tubulo-interstitial immune filtrates and fibrosis were increased in LN patients who did not respond to immunosuppressive therapy.  Such markers included CD45RO, HLA-DR, CD14 (macrophages), CD163 (M2 macrophages), collagen I, collagen IV and fibronectin.  Lastly, there was evidence of increased epithelial to mesenchymal plasticity (EMP) in the glomerular and tubolo-interstitial ROIs in nonresponders compared to responders, with increased staining for β-catenin and vimentin.  An unsupervised BNA assessing all clinical and IMC variables revealed associations between the response node with gender, fibrous crescents and chronicity index while the fibronectin node was strongly associated with CD14+ macrophages for both the glomerular (Figure 3) and tubulointerstitial ROIs.

Conclusion: Through IMC proteomics and machine learning, we identified increased macrophages, fibrosis and EMP as markers associated with poorer treatment outcome for LN.  Class V LN, unlike Class IV LN, has hitherto been not associated with glomerulosclerosis on routine histopathological examination.  We demonstrate for the first time that collagen deposition and fibrosis was increased in Class V glomeruli compared to Class IV using IMC proteomics.   

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Increased glomerular/peri-glomerular fibrosis is observed in Class V LN compared to Class IV LN.
(A) The targets displayed in the imaging mass cytometry images are shown pseudo-colored, as indicated. Shown data is representative of 53 glomerular regions of interest drawn from 8 Class IV LN patients, 8 Class V LN patients, and 2 RCC controls. (B-G) Mann Whitney U tests were conducted to assess significant changes in glomerular fibrosis markers between Class IV LN (green), Class V LN (red) and RCC controls (blue). Whereas each point represents a single interrogated ROI, the bar-charts show the mean in each group. (A, B) Hypercellularity (DNA) in glomeruli was observed in Class IV and Class V LN biopsies compared to RCC controls. (C-E) In addition, kidneys with Class V LN showed increased periglomerular deposition of fibronectin, collagen I and collagen IV. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.

Supporting image 2

Figure 2. Glomerular immune cell infiltrates were increased in LN patients who did not respond to immunosuppressive therapy.
(A) Shown imaging mass cytometry images are representative of 47 glomerular regions of interest drawn from 8 Complete Responder (CR), 4 Partial Responder (PR) and 4 Non-Responder (NR) patients. The targets displayed in this figure are shown pseudo-colored, as indicated. (B-G) Mann Whitney U tests were conducted to assess significant changes in glomerular infiltrating immune cell markers between NR (blue), PR (green) and CR (red). Whereas each point represents a single interrogated ROI, the bar-charts show the mean in each group. (A, B, C, D, E and G) Patients who did not respond to therapy (NR) had significantly increased numbers of immune cell infiltrates into the glomeruli, including CD45RO+ memory T cells, CD4+ T cells, HLA-DR+ antigen presenting cells, CD14+ macrophages and CD163+ M2 macrophages, compared to LN patients who responded to therapy (CR and PR). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.

Supporting image 3

Figure 3. Bayesian network analysis conducted to study the association between renal response, clinical data, pathology indices and renal protein biomarkers expressed in glomeruli.
The size of each node was determined using “node force” and is proportional to its impact on other nodes in the network, as determined by conditional probabilities. The connections between nodes are determined by Pearson’s correlation coefficient, showing how variables depend on each other, with the thickness of the connections representing the strength of the correlation. Blue edges represent positive correlations while red edges represent negative correlations.


Disclosures: F. Tay: None; A. Louis Sam Titus: None; V. Maruvada: None; S. Lim: None; J. Cho: None; T. Thamboo: None; C. Mohan: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Equillium, 5, Progentec Diagnostics, 11, Voyager Therapeutics, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tay F, Louis Sam Titus A, Maruvada V, Lim S, Cho J, Thamboo T, Mohan C. Elucidating the Molecular Correlates of Treatment Response in Lupus Nephritis via Imaging Mass Cytometry Proteomics and Machine Learning [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/elucidating-the-molecular-correlates-of-treatment-response-in-lupus-nephritis-via-imaging-mass-cytometry-proteomics-and-machine-learning/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/elucidating-the-molecular-correlates-of-treatment-response-in-lupus-nephritis-via-imaging-mass-cytometry-proteomics-and-machine-learning/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology