ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1562

Elevated Serum B-Cell Activating Factor (BAFF/BlyS) Characterises Disease Relapse Following Rituximab In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Lucy M. Carter1, David A. Isenberg2 and Michael R. Ehrenstein3, 1University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Centre for Rheumatology Research, Rayne Building, 4th Floor, Centre for Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 3Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: autoantibodies and rituximab, BAFF, Lupus, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects II: Central Nervous System Manifestations, Therapeutics

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Numerous reports suggest that B cell depletion therapy (BCDT) using rituximab is effective in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, two major trials did not confirm these results. We, and others, have shown that the characteristics and kinetics of repopulating B cells are associated with different clinical responses to BCDT. B cell activating factor / B Lymphocyte Stimulator (BAFF / BLyS) is a key mediator of B cell survival and self-tolerance, which is over-expressed in many patients with SLE. The present study examines changes in serum BAFF at disease flares and remission following BCDT and repopulation of peripheral B cells, and assesses the relationship between serum BAFF, B cell number and autoantibody levels according to treatment outcome.

Methods:

35 patients with SLE, treated with one or more cycles of BCDT using rituximab, cyclophosphamide and methylprednisilone, had stored serum samples available for analysis. Patients were followed up until disease flare, further BCDT or for a minimum of 18 months following BCDT. Anti-dsDNA levels, immunoglobulins and CD19+ counts were recorded during follow up. Clinical disease was assessed using the BILAG index. Serum BAFF was measured during disease flare prior to BCDT and at subsequent relapse or remission, using a human BAFF ELISA.

Results:

Following initial BCDT, 10 patients remained in remission for the duration of follow up. Twenty-five patients went on to relapse, of which 22 were treated with further BCDT. BAFF levels were positively correlated with B cell numbers (R = 0.65, p < 0.05) and serum IgG (R = 0.56, p < 0.01) prior to BCDT, but did not predict subsequent treatment outcome or time to repopulation following rituximab (p > 0.05). However, serum BAFF after BCDT and subsequent B cell repopulation was significantly higher at disease relapse compared to levels in patients who remained in remission (p < 0.01) but also compared with the disease flare prior to BCDT (p < 0.05). Following BCDT serum BAFF was inversely correlated with B cell numbers at disease flare (R =  -0.44, p < 0.05), with flare at lower B cell numbers associated with the highest BAFF levels. Changes in serum BAFF during relapse or remission strongly correlated with change in anti-dsDNA antibody levels (R = 0.62, p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

The present data suggest a significant role for BAFF in driving disease flare after B-cell repopulation following BCDT. In some patients sequential BCDT promoted ever increasing BAFF levels accompanied by rising anti-DNA antibodies and flare even at low B-cell numbers. Therefore, our data justifies the judicious use of BAFF blockade in a subgroup of lupus patients after BCDT.


Disclosure:

L. M. Carter,
None;

D. A. Isenberg,
None;

M. R. Ehrenstein,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/elevated-serum-b-cell-activating-factor-baffblys-characterises-disease-relapse-following-rituximab-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology