ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2433

Efficacy of Ketoprofen Vs Ibuprofen and Diclofenac for Treating Pain in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fabiola Atzeni1,2, Alessandra Monguzzi3, Elisabetta Grillo3, Luigi Lanata3 and Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini2, 1V Giovanni Battista Grassi 74, Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy, 2Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy, 3Medical Department, Dompé SpA, Milan, Italy

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Ibuprofen, Inflammation, meta-analysis, pain management and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ARHP): Clinical Practice/Patient Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Patients with rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), describe symptoms such as pain and stiffness as important factors affecting their quality of life. The most widely used drugs to decrease inflammation and manage mild-to-moderate pain in RA patients are NSAIDs. In our previous meta-analysis, we demonstrated that ketoprofen was superior to ibuprofen and/or diclofenac in relieving different kinds of moderate-to-severe pain conditions, and so the aim of this systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was to compare the clinical efficacy of these drugs in patients with the specific pain associated with RA.

Methods: We made a systematic search of the Medline and Embase databases from their inception to March 2014 in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration guideline in order to identify RCTs directly comparing the recommended therapeutic doses of oral ketoprofen (50-200 mg/day), ibuprofen (600-1800 mg/day) and diclofenac (75-150 mg/day) for RA pain relief. The meta-analysis was made using the standardized mean difference (SMD) of each included RCT and a fixed effects model.

Results: Five RCTs, involving a total of 456 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference in clinical efficacy in favour of ketoprofen (SMD= 0.34; CI 95% 0.16-0.52; p=0.0002). The heterogeneity test for the efficacy outcome was not statistically significant and equal to zero (χ2=3.67 – df=4 – P=0.45 – I2=0%), thus demonstrating the homogeneity of the trials and the validity of the meta-analysis findings. The meta-analysis did not reveal any significant differences between drugs in terms of tolerability (the percentage of patients developing adverse events) or safety (withdrawn patients).

Conclusion: The result of this meta-analysis shows that therapeutic doses of ketoprofen are more efficacious than ibuprofen and diclofenac in managing RA-related pain, thus supporting its use in clinical practice.


Disclosure:

F. Atzeni,
None;

A. Monguzzi,

Dompè SpA,

3;

E. Grillo,

Dompè SpA,

3;

L. Lanata,

Dompè SpA,

3;

P. Sarzi-Puttini,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-ketoprofen-vs-ibuprofen-and-diclofenac-for-treating-pain-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology