ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2408

Effects of Ground and Joint Reaction Force Exercise On Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

George A. Kelley1, Kristi S. Kelley1 and Wendy M. Kohrt2, 1Biostatistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 2Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado @ Denver, Aurora, CO

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Bone density, exercise, meta-analysis, osteoporosis and women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Previous randomized controlled trials have led to conflicting findings regarding the effects of ground and/or joint reaction force exercise on femoral neck (FN) and lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women.  The purpose of this study was to use the aggregate data meta-analytic approach to resolve these discrepancies. 

Methods: The a priori inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized controlled trials, (2) ground and/or joint reaction force exercise > 24 weeks, (3) comparative control group, (4) postmenopausal women, (5) participants not regularly active, (6) published and unpublished studies in any language since January 1, 1989, (7) BMD data available at the FN and/or LS. Studies were located by searching six electronic databases, cross-referencing, hand searching and expert review. Dual selection of studies and data abstraction were performed. Hedge’s standardized effect size (g) was calculated for each FN and LS BMD result and pooled using random-effects models. Z-score alpha values, 95% confidence intervals (CI) and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) were calculated for pooled results. Heterogeneity was examined using Q and I2.  Mixed-effects ANOVA and simple meta-regression were used to examine changes in FN and LS BMD according to selected categorical and continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at an alpha value ≤ 0.05 and a trend at >0.05 to ≤ 0.10.

Results: Statistically significant exercise minus control group improvements were found for both FN (28 g’s, 1632 participants, g = 0.288, 95% CI = 0.102, 0.474, p = 0.002, Q = 90.5, p<0.0001, I2 = 70.1%, NNT = 6) and LS (28 g’s, 1504 participants, g = 0.179, 95% CI = -0.003, 0.361, p = 0.05, Q = 77.7, p<0.0001, I2= 65.3%, NNT = 6) BMD. None of the mixed-effects ANOVA analyses were statistically significant.  For both FN and LS BMD, statistically significant, or a trend for statistically significant and positive associations were observed for intensity of training and compliance (joint reaction force exercise only) as well as changes in static balance. Inverse associations were observed for compliance (combined ground and joint reaction force exercise) as well as changes in body mass index, body weight and percent body fat. When limited to the LS, statistically significant, or a trend for statistically significant and positive associations were found for age, years postmenopausal and changes in lean body mass while inverse associations were observed for duration of training (minutes per session, ground reaction force exercise only), total minutes of training per week (ground reaction force exercise only), compliance (combined ground and joint reaction force exercise) and changes in aerobic fitness. 

Conclusion: Exercise benefits FN and LS BMD in postmenopausal women. Several of the observed associations appear worthy of further investigation in well-designed randomized controlled trials.


Disclosure:

G. A. Kelley,
None;

K. S. Kelley,
None;

W. M. Kohrt,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effects-of-ground-and-joint-reaction-force-exercise-on-bone-mineral-density-in-postmenopausal-women-a-meta-analysis-of-randomized-controlled-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology