ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2024

Effects of Filgotinib on Spinal Lesions in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data from the Placebo-Controlled, Double‑Blind, Randomized TORTUGA Trial

Walter Maksymowych1, Mikkel Østergaard2, Robert Landewé3, William Barchuk4, Ke Liu4, Chantal Tasset5, Leen Gilles5, Thijs Hendrikx6, Robin Besuyen6 and Xenofon Baraliakos7, 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3Amsterdam University Medical Center & Zuyderland Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, 5Galapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium, 6Galapagos BV, Leiden, Netherlands, 7Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet-Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Erosions, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Randomized Trial, Structure

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment II: Emerging Therapies (2023–2027)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-11:50AM

Background/Purpose: The oral, selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor filgotinib (FIL) significantly improved Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI inflammation scores (bone marrow edema) in the spine and sacroiliac joints vs placebo (PBO) in the Phase 2 TORTUGA trial (NCT03117270) in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS; van der Heijde D, et al. Lancet 2018;392:2378–87). The current post hoc analysis evaluated the effects of FIL on Canada‑Denmark (CANDEN) MRI measures of spinal inflammation and structural lesions in patients from the TORTUGA trial.

Methods: TORTUGA was a PBO-controlled, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial in which 116 patients with active AS (as per modified New York classification criteria, with sacroiliitis confirmed by central reading) were treated with FIL 200 mg (n=58) or PBO (n=58) once daily for 12 weeks. MRIs of the total spine were conducted at baseline and at the end of treatment. Scans were re‑evaluated post hoc by 2 independent experts (blinded to time point and assigned treatment) according to the detailed anatomy-based CANDEN method (Krabbe S, et al. RMD Open 2019;5:e001057); inter-reader discrepancies were resolved by an independent adjudicator. Observed changes from baseline were evaluated using analysis of covariance with factors for treatment, baseline value, and randomization stratification by prior TNF inhibitor use. Least-squares mean changes from baseline and between-group differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated; p-values are nominal.

Results: MRI scans from 88 patients (47 FIL, 41 PBO) with an evaluable MRI at baseline and Week 12 (or early termination visit) were re-evaluated. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between subjects with and without an MRI scan. Of those with MRI scans, mean total spine inflammation score (which ranges from 0 to 614) was higher in the FIL vs PBO group and mean ankylosis score (which ranges from 0 to 460) was lower in the FIL group vs PBO at baseline (Table 1). Total spine inflammation scores decreased from baseline in the FIL group but not in the PBO group (Figure; Table 2; p=0.0003 for between-group difference). Cumulative probability plots favored FIL over PBO for change from baseline in subregion inflammation scores, including postero-lateral elements (i.e. sum of lesions in ribs, transverse processes, spinous processes, soft tissue inflammation and posterolateral vertebral body), facet joint (Figure), and vertebral body. Total spine fat lesion scores numerically increased from baseline in the FIL group but decreased in the PBO group (p=0.0878 for between-group difference; Table 2). There were no statistically significant differences between groups for changes in erosion (p=0.1956) or ankylosis (p=0.2203) scores (Table 2).

Conclusion: Compared with PBO, FIL decreased inflammation, including in the postero-lateral elements of the spine and facet joints, which has not been demonstrated previously in a PBO-controlled trial. As expected in a 12-week study period, no changes in erosion or ankylosis were seen. Due to the imbalance in MRI measures at baseline and post hoc nature of the analysis, our findings need to be confirmed in a large trial.

Table 1. Demographics and baseline characteristics for patients with an MRI scan. Data are mean (SD) unless otherwise indicated. ASDAS, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; CANDEN, Canada-Denmark; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; MASES, Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SD, standard deviation; SIJ, sacroiliac joint; SPARCC, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada; TNF, tumor necrosis factor

Figure 1. Change from baseline in (a) total CANDEN spine inflammation score, (b) posterior elements inflammation subregion score, and (c) facet joint inflammation subregion score. CANDEN, Canada-Denmark

Table 2. Change from baseline at Week 12 in CANDEN total spine inflammation, total spine fat, total spine bone erosion, and ankyloses scores. CANDEN, Canada-Denmark; CI, confidence interval; LS, least squares; SE, standard error


Disclosure: W. Maksymowych, CARE Arthritis Limited, 9, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 5, Janssen, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; M. Østergaard, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Hospira, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Novo Nordisk, 5, Orion, 5, 8, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8; R. Landewé, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Rheumatology Consultancy BV, 1, Ablynx, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, Gilead, 5, Novo Nordisk, 5, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Schering, 2, 5, 8, TiGenix, 5; W. Barchuk, Gilead Sciences, 1, 3, AbbVie, 9, Eli Lilly, 9, Johnson & Johnson, 9; K. Liu, Gilead Sciences, 1, 3; C. Tasset, Galapagos, 1, 3; L. Gilles, Galapagos, 3; T. Hendrikx, Galapagos, 1, 3; R. Besuyen, Galapagos, 1, 3; X. Baraliakos, AbbVie, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Chugai, 2, 5, MSD, 2, 5, Sandoz, 2, 5, Hexal, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maksymowych W, Østergaard M, Landewé R, Barchuk W, Liu K, Tasset C, Gilles L, Hendrikx T, Besuyen R, Baraliakos X. Effects of Filgotinib on Spinal Lesions in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data from the Placebo-Controlled, Double‑Blind, Randomized TORTUGA Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effects-of-filgotinib-on-spinal-lesions-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-magnetic-resonance-imaging-data-from-the-placebo-controlled-double%e2%80%91blind-randomized-tortuga-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effects-of-filgotinib-on-spinal-lesions-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-magnetic-resonance-imaging-data-from-the-placebo-controlled-double%e2%80%91blind-randomized-tortuga-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology