ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 931

Dose-Response Effects of Tai Chi and Physical Therapy Exercise Interventions in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Augustine Lee1, William F. Harvey2, Lori Lyn Price3,4, Xingyi Han1, Jeffrey B. Driban1, Maura D. Iversen5,6, Raveendhara R. Bannuru1 and Chenchen Wang2, 1Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 2Rheumatology, Center of Integrative Medicine and Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, Boston, MA, 3Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, 4Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 5Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 6Department of Physical Therapy, Movement & Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2017

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: exercise, Osteoarthritis, physical therapy and tai chi

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects I: Pain and Functional Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Therapeutic exercise is the recommended non-pharmacological treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the optimal treatment dose and clinically meaningful treatment durations remain unclear. Our purpose was to examine dose-response relationships, the minimum effective dose, and baseline factors associated with the timing of response from two exercise interventions among adults with symptomatic knee OA.

Methods: Secondary analysis of a single-blind, randomized trial comparing 12-week Tai Chi and Physical Therapy exercise programs among adults with symptomatic knee OA (ACR Criteria). WOMAC pain (0-500) and function (0-1700) scores were completed each week of intervention. We defined dose as attendance-weeks (i.e. total treatment weeks attended), and treatment response as ≥20% and ≥50% improvement in pain and function. Using log-rank tests, we compared time-to-response between interventions, and used Cox regression to examine baseline factors associated with the timing of response (≥50% improvement only).

Results: We examined 182 participants (mean age 61 years, BMI 32 kg/m2, 70% female, 55% white). Both interventions had linear dose-response effect resulting in a 9 to 11-point reduction in WOMAC pain and a 32 to 41-point improvement in function per week. There was no significant difference in overall time-to-response for pain and function between treatment groups (Figure). Median time-to-response for ≥20% improvement in pain and function was 2 attendance-weeks and 4 to 5 attendance-weeks for ≥50% improvement. On unadjusted models, we found a general pattern wherein physical health factors, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations tended to be significantly associated with treatment response rather than psychosocial or biomechanical factors (Table). On multivariable models, outcome expectations were independently associated with incident function response (Hazard Ratio: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.004 to 2.14).

Conclusion: Both interventions had linear dose-dependent effects on pain and function, their minimum effective doses ranged from 2 (≥20% improvement) to 5 weeks (≥50% improvement), and patient-perceived benefits of exercise independently influenced the timing of response among adults with symptomatic knee OA. These results may help clinicians optimize patient-centered exercise treatments and better manage patient expectations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Table. Unadjusted Hazard Ratios of Treatment Response (≥50% improvement) in Pain and Physical Function by Baseline Factors (n=182)

Characteristic

Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)

 

Pain

Function

Age, years

1.01     (0.99, 1.03)

1.02     (1.00, 1.04)

Female Sex, n (%)

1.32     (0.87, 2.01)

1.29     (0.85, 1.96)

Race, n (%)

 

 

White

reference

reference

Black

0.71     (0.47, 1.07)

0.59     (0.39, 0.91)

Asian/Other

0.94     (0.53, 1.67)

0.91     (0.52, 1.58)

Body Mass Index, kg/m2

0.98     (0.96, 1.01)

0.98     (0.95, 1.00)

Duration of knee pain, years

1.01     (1.00, 1.03)

1.01     (1.00, 1.03)

Highest Level of Education, n (%)

 

 

High school graduate or less

reference

reference

Some college or more

1.69     (0.97, 2.94)

1.85     (1.02, 3.36)

WOMAC Pain

(Range: 0-500); (50-point units)

n/a

0.86     (0.78, 0.95)

WOMAC Physical Function

(Range: 0-1700); (100-point units)

0.96     (0.91, 1.004)

n/a

Patient Global Assessment

(Range: 0-10cm)

0.87     (0.80, 0.94)

0.88     (0.81, 0.96)

SF-36 Physical Component Summary

(Range: 0-100)#; (10-point units) 

1.35     (1.10, 1.65)

1.46     (1.18, 1.81)

PROMIS Sleep disturbance

(Range, T-Score: 28.9-76.5); (10-point units)

0.88     (0.74, 1.05)

0.83     (0.69, 1.00)

SF-36 Energy and Vitality

(Range: 0-100)#; (10-point units)

1.06     (0.96, 1.17)

1.08     (0.97, 1.19)

CHAMPS Physical Activity

moderate-high calories/week#

(500-calories/week units)

1.05     (1.003, 1.10)

1.06     (1.009, 1.11)

6-Minute Walk Test

meters# (50-meter units)

1.12     (1.01, 1.25)

1.14     (1.03, 1.27)

Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale-8

(Range: 0-10)#

1.11     (1.01, 1.21)

1.14     (1.04, 1.25)

Outcome Expectations

(Range: 1.0-5.0)#           

1.14     (0.82, 1.57)

1.43     (1.03, 1.97)

CHAMPS= Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors; PROMIS= Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems; SF-36= Short Form-36; WOMAC= Western Ontario and McMasters Osteoarthritis Index. *Normal range reported for the general population. #Higher score indicates greater health.

 

 

 


Disclosure: A. Lee, None; W. F. Harvey, None; L. L. Price, None; X. Han, None; J. B. Driban, None; M. D. Iversen, NIAMS-NIH, PZifer, Fulbright, 2; R. R. Bannuru, None; C. Wang, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lee A, Harvey WF, Price LL, Han X, Driban JB, Iversen MD, Bannuru RR, Wang C. Dose-Response Effects of Tai Chi and Physical Therapy Exercise Interventions in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dose-response-effects-of-tai-chi-and-physical-therapy-exercise-interventions-in-symptomatic-knee-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2017

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dose-response-effects-of-tai-chi-and-physical-therapy-exercise-interventions-in-symptomatic-knee-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology