ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 382

Does Biased Risk Perception Explain the Underuse of Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs?

Richard W. Martin1, Andrew J. Head2, James D. Birmingham3 and Aaron T. Eggebeen1, 1Medicine, Rheumatology, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, 2Medicine, Rheumatology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, 3Medicine & Pediatrics, Rheumatology, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs, quality of care, race/ethnicity, rheumatoid arthritis, treatment and risk assessment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects I: Drug Studies/Drug Safety/Drug Utilization/Disease Activity & Remission

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The prescription of a Disease Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is considered a standard of effective care.  However a recent study of Medicare managed care enrollees, only 63% received a DMARD.  The explanation for underutilization is not fully known. In a sample of 144 patients, Constantinescu et al found compared to white adults with RA, African American patients assigned greater importance to the risks of treatment over the likelihood for benefit.  The purpose of our study was to evaluate the determinants of risk perception (RP) in a large cohort of community RA patients and predictors of their willingness to take a proposed DMARD (DMARD willingness).

Methods: A single center, cross-sectional mail survey of RA patients in a community rheumatology practice.  Patient characteristics including heath literacy screening index (HL), depression, RA duration, DMARD experience including bother from current DMARD side effects, satisfaction with RA control, Decision Regret Scale,TNFi knowledge, happiness, HAQ2, and CDAI were collected.  Patients were presented a hypothetical decision scenario where they were asked to consider switching DMARDs.  They evaluated how risky the proposed medication was and how likely they would be to take it.  Predictors of RP and DMARD willingness were identified with hierarchical linear regression modeling.

Results: The completed sample included 1009 RA patients.  The overall survey response rate was 71%.  Patient characteristics: age 61.6 years (range 18-93), 75% female, minority 6.5%, low or marginal health literacy 8.8%, depression 15.0%, duration RA 13.1 years (range 0.5 – 68).   A regression model evaluating predictors of RP demonstrated a R2 = 13.5.  The standardized regression coefficients show the strongest predictor of RP was HAQ2 disability (B=.152), followed by HL (B= -.149), and current or past experience of DMARD related bother(B=.146).  Age, TNFi knowledge, happiness and depression, and other demographics did not significantly add to the predictive power of the model.   A second model of predictors of DMARD willingness had a R2= 12.7%.  The standardized regression coefficients show the strongest predictors of DMARD willingness were satisfaction with control of RA (B=-1.67) and regret related to their previous DMARD choice (B=-1.60), and HL (B= 1.49).  Age and other demographic characteristics, extent of past RA and general DMARD related experience, happiness and depression did not significantly add to the predictive power of the model. 

Conclusion: RP was influenced by negative RA disease and treatment experience, while DMARD willingness was affected by perceived disease control.  Health literacy, independent of low educational achievement or other demographic, was a predictor of both RP and DMARD willingness.  When proposing to initiate a new DMARD, clinicians must be alert for cognitive impairment whether derived from educational, language, age related decline in information processing that could affect patient decision making.   Time pressures increase cognitive load, which might justify extending the time of deliberation beyond the constraints of the office visit by using decision aids.


Disclosure:

R. W. Martin,
None;

A. J. Head,
None;

J. D. Birmingham,
None;

A. T. Eggebeen,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-biased-risk-perception-explain-the-underuse-of-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology