ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2646

DNA methylation-based clustering reveals clinically distinct subtypes of systemic lupus erythematosus

Meghan Nelson1, Mary Horton2, Joanne Nititham2, Jinoos Yazdany3, Maria Dall'Era4, Cristina Lanata5 and Lindsey Criswell2, 1NIH/NIAMS/NHGRI, Bethesda, MD, 2NIH/NHGRI, Bethesda, MD, 3UCSF, San Francisco, CA, 4Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 5NIH/NHGRI, Bethesda

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biomarkers, Epigenetics, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes III (2645–2650)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:45AM-10:00AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogenous autoimmune disease with significant variability in clinical presentation. DNA methylation has been associated with lupus risk and heterogeneity. In order to identify biologically relevant molecular subtypes, we leveraged genome-wide methylation profiles to cluster patients and evaluate associations between methylation-based clusters and SLE clinical characteristics.

Methods: We analyzed methylation profiles from 1,882 multi-ancestry SLE patients. Clinical data was collected at enrollment and time of peripheral blood collection. Genome-wide methylation profiles were generated using Illumina’s EPICv2 BeadChip (n= 937,690 CpG sites). Normalization and quality control were performed using minfi. CpGs with high detection p-values and cross-reactive probes were excluded, and missing methylation values imputed using methyLImp2. We selected the top 5% most variable CpGs (~60,000) by beta value standard deviation and performed unsupervised k-means clustering using ConsensusClusterPlus across multiple CpG sets (n = 5,000; 10,000; 25,000; 60,000 CpGs). The most distinct clustering was observed with 60,000 CpGs and k=4. Differentially methylated positions (DMPs) by cluster were identified using limma, with beta values used for coefficient interpretation and M values to determine statistical significance. Models adjusted for genetic principal components, Houseman estimated blood cell proportions, batch, age, disease duration, sex. DMPs with FDR q< 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: We identified 4 distinct clusters based on methylation beta values (Figure 1). Clusters 1 and 2 reflected milder disease with discoid rash (p=0.002); Cluster 3 exhibited older age at enrollment (p=0.001); Cluster 4 was associated with more severe disease as reflected by younger age of diagnosis (p=0.006), serositis (p< 0.001), nephritis (p< 0.001), higher proportion of males (p=0.006) and hematologic abnormalities (p< 0.001). 2,569 CpGs with FDR q< 0.05 were identified across all cross-comparisons between clusters (Figure 2). Significant CpGs annotated to ZFP36L1 (an RNA-binding protein that plays a role in post-transcriptional gene regulation), DOCK9 (involved in intracellular signaling networks), and NEK8 (protein kinase involved in cell cycle regulation, DNA damage response, and mitosis). Of the significant CpG sites, the absolute change in methylation between clusters ranged from -4.6% to 3.8 %. A majority of these were hypomethylated; 267 were located within genes, and 322 were in promoter regions. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed cluster-specific enrichment: Cluster 1 in leukocyte cell adhesion (FDR q=0.025) and leucocyte activation involved in immune response (FDR q=0.025); Cluster 2 in positive regulation of MAPK (FDR q=0.0003); Cluster 3 in neutrophil degranulation (FDR q=0.001); and Cluster 4 in pattern specification (FDR q=1e-5) and cell adhesion (FDR q=1e-5).

Conclusion: We identified 2,569 differentially methylated CpGs across 4 distinct SLE clusters. These results support the potential of DNA methylation profiling to reveal molecular subtypes of SLE and improve risk stratification.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. Consensus Plot (k=4) of Patient Clusters based off methylation beta values.

Supporting image 2Figure 2. Volcano Plot of Significant CpGs shared across all cross-clusters.


Disclosures: M. Nelson: None; M. Horton: None; J. Nititham: None; J. Yazdany: AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Aurinia, 5, BMS Foundation, 5, 12, BMS Foundation, Gilead, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2; M. Dall'Era: AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, Biogen, 2, Genentech, Inc., 2, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), 2, Janssen, 2; C. Lanata: None; L. Criswell: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nelson M, Horton M, Nititham J, Yazdany J, Dall'Era M, Lanata C, Criswell L. DNA methylation-based clustering reveals clinically distinct subtypes of systemic lupus erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dna-methylation-based-clustering-reveals-clinically-distinct-subtypes-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dna-methylation-based-clustering-reveals-clinically-distinct-subtypes-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology