ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 492

Distinction Between Glucocorticoid-Responders and Non-Responders In Rheumatoid Arthritis: A New Role For Endoplasmic Reticulum Aminopeptidase 2

Ruth Fritsch-Stork1, Sandra Cardoso1, Jasper Broen1, Marian Groot-Koerkamp2, Arno Concepcion1, Floris Lafeber1 and Johannes W.J. Bijlsma1, 1Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Molecular Cancer Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: CD T cells, Gene Expression, glucocorticoids, monocytes and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Glucocorticoids (GC) have been a cornerstone of Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-therapy for the last decades. However, about a third of RA-patients do not respond adequately. As monocytes and T-cells play an important role in RA-pathogenesis, the differential gene expression of these cells before and 24 hours after start of pulse therapy with methylprednisolone was evaluated in order to find potential predictors of GC-response.

Methods: CD14-positive and CD4-positive cells were isolated by MACS sorting from five GC-Responders meeting the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria and five Non-Responders. The clinical response was measured by disease activity score (DAS28) at the end of pulse therapy (3x 1000mg Methylprednisolone) at day 5. Labeled cRNA was hybridized to Agilent 4x44K microarrays and differentially expressed genes were determined by MAANOVA. False discovery rate was used as multiple testing correction and set at 5%. Genes were validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

Results: We found eight known genes differentially expressed in CD14-cells and 4 in CD4-T-cells of GC-Responders compared to Non-Responders before start of therapy using microarrays. After 24 hours, 13 known genes were seen differentially expressed in CD14-cells and CD4-T-cells each. Higher expression of ERAP2 in monocytes and CD4-cells (fold change  (FC) Responders vs. Non-Responders: 6.6 and 4.9; p<0.007 and p<0.02) and LST1 and FAM26F in CD4-Tcells of GC-Responders (FC: 2.54 and 4.4; p<0.06 and p<0.009)  before start of therapy was verified by qPCR and correlated with DAS28 at day 5. In both cell types ERAP2 (CD14-cells: FC: 4.9; p<0.01; CD4-cells: FC: 7.5; p<0.003) and FAM26F (CD14-cells: FC: 4.2; p<0.007; CD4-cells: FC: 8.0; p=0.058) were also significantly higher after 24 hours in GC-Responders measured by qPCR. Additionally, CCNB2 (FC: 0.49; p<0.008) was significantly and TMP4 (FC: 0.62; p=0.058) marginally lower in CD4-Tcells and CEP350 and DICER were marginally higher (FC: 1.8; p=0.054 and FC: 1.55; p=0.063) in CD14-cells of GC-Responders compared to GC-Non-Responders.

Conclusion:   We found several differentially expressed genes in GC-Responders versus GC-Non-Responders before and 24 hours after start of pulse therapy. The most striking difference is the significantly higher expression of ERAP2 in T-cells and monocytes of GC-Responders. ERAP2 constitutes a susceptibility locus in autoimmune disease, and functions as proteolytic enzyme implicated in antigen presentation. Its homologue is also known to cleave cell surface receptors (TNFR1, IL1R2, IL6Ra). The increased expression in GC-Responders compared to GC-Non-Responders may thus constitute not only a potential predictor of the clinical response to GC in RA, but also warrants further investigation to elucidate the possible role in the inflammatory process of RA.


Disclosure:

R. Fritsch-Stork,
None;

S. Cardoso,
None;

J. Broen,
None;

M. Groot-Koerkamp,
None;

A. Concepcion,
None;

F. Lafeber,
None;

J. W. J. Bijlsma,

Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5,

BMS,

5,

UCB,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

UCB,

2,

BMS,

2,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/distinction-between-glucocorticoid-responders-and-non-responders-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-new-role-for-endoplasmic-reticulum-aminopeptidase-2/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology