ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0625

Distinct Effects of JAK Inhibitor and TNF Inhibitors on Circulating B Cell Phenotypes in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Mehreen Elahee1, Kathryne Marks1, Ifeoluwakiisi Adejoorin1, Lin Chen1, Derrick Todd1, Jonathan Coblyn1, Elena Massarotti1, Susan Ritter1, Daniel Solomon1, Michael Weinblatt2 and Deepak Rao1, 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: RA – Etiology and Pathogenesis Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Multiple DMARDs are used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) yet, there are currently few tools to assess if DMARD treatment influences pathologic immune cell activation. B cells play critical roles in the pathogenesis of RA and are an important therapeutic target. We have evaluated effects of two RA therapies, TNF inhibitors and JAK inhibitors, on circulating B cells. Defining the B cell phenotypes altered by either drug class may help to identify B specific cell populations associated with treatment response and provide biomarkers to assess effects of treatment on the active immune response.

Methods: Blood samples were collected from RA patients before and after treatment with JAK inhibitor (n=27) or TNF inhibitor (n=32). RA patients met the 2010 ACR-EULAR RA classification criteria. B cell subsets were analyzed using flow cytometry with the following markers: CD14, CD19, CD20, IgD, CD27, CD38, CD21, IgG, IgM, IgA, CD24 and CD11c. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and electronic medical records review before and after treatment was used to categorize patients into treatment responders or non-responders. IgD and CD27 was used to identify the main B cell subsets: naïve (IgD+CD27–), switched memory (IgD–CD27+), non-switched memory (IgD+CD27+) and double negative (DN, IgD–CD27–), Plasmablasts (CD38++CD27+). The Naïve B cell gate was used to further quantify activated naïve B cells (aNAV, CD11c+ CD21–) and transitional B cells (CD38+CD24+). Wilcoxon paired tests were used for comparison between the two timepoints with Bonferroni correction.

Results: Patients in both treatment groups had similar circulating levels of all B cell subsets at baseline. Comparison of the pre- and post-treatment frequencies of B cell subsets demonstrated that the proportion of transitional B cells decreased significantly after treatment with JAK inhibitor (p=0.002) but not with anti-TNF (p=0.94) (Fig 1A). Proportion of aNAV B cells also showed a significant decrease following treatment with JAK inhibitors (p=0.02) but not TNF inhibitors (p=0.17) (Fig 1B). The proportions of naïve B cells and plasmablasts did not change post treatment with JAK inhibitor (p=.68) or anti-TNF (p=.32). 19 out of 27 patients in the JAK inhibitor arm and 20 out of 32 patients in the TNF inhibitor arm were classified as treatment responders. Frequencies of B cell populations at the pre-treatment timepoint did not differ between responders and non-responders in either treatment arm. Among JAK inhibitor treated patients, both transitional B cells and aNAV B cells decreased comparably in treatment responders and non-responders. Decreases in these B cell populations were also comparable between seropositive (n=34) and seronegative (n=25) patients.

Conclusion: We found significant reductions in the transitional B cell and aNAV B cell populations in RA patients treated with JAK inhibitors, but not in patients treated with TNF inhibitors. Further understanding of the cellular changes associated with specific DMARDs may provide insights into the relevant mechanisms of action of different treatments and may provide biomarkers that can be quantified.

Supporting image 1


Disclosures: M. Elahee, None; K. Marks, None; I. Adejoorin, None; L. Chen, None; D. Todd, None; J. Coblyn, None; E. Massarotti, None; S. Ritter, Pfizer; D. Solomon, Amgen, AbbVie/Abbott, CorEvitas, Moderna, Janssen; M. Weinblatt, Eli Lilly, AbbVie/Abbott, aclaris, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), corevitas, Eqrx, genosco, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Gilead, horizon therapeutics, johnson and johnson, scipher, canfite, inmedix; D. Rao, Janssen, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Scipher Medicine, HiFiBio, Inc., AstraZeneca, Pfizer.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Elahee M, Marks K, Adejoorin I, Chen L, Todd D, Coblyn J, Massarotti E, Ritter S, Solomon D, Weinblatt M, Rao D. Distinct Effects of JAK Inhibitor and TNF Inhibitors on Circulating B Cell Phenotypes in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/distinct-effects-of-jak-inhibitor-and-tnf-inhibitors-on-circulating-b-cell-phenotypes-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/distinct-effects-of-jak-inhibitor-and-tnf-inhibitors-on-circulating-b-cell-phenotypes-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology