ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1217

Discontinuation Rate of Tofacitinib Is Similar When Compared to TNF Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Pooled Data from Two Rheumatoid Arthritis Registries in Canada

Mohammad Movahedi1, Denis Choquette2, Louis Coupal2, Angela Cesta3, Xiuying Li3, Edward Keystone4 and Claire Bombardier5, 1Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada, 3Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Keystone Consulting Enterprises Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada, 5University of Toronto - Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: biologic response modifiers, Cohort Study, registry, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III: Prediction, Biomarkers, & Treatment Response (1196–1222)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib (TOFA) is an oral, small molecule drug used for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment as the first or an alternative option to biologic disease- modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), including tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). The similarity in retention of TNFi and TOFA was previously reported separately by the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) and the Quebec cohort RHUMADATA. To increase the study power, we propose to evaluate the discontinuation rate (due to any reason) of TNFi compared to TOFA, using pooled data from both these registries.

Methods: RA patients enrolled in the OBRI and RHUMADATA initiating their TOFA or TNFi between 1st June 2014 (TOFA approval date in Canada) and 31st Dec 2019 were included. Time to discontinuation was assessed using adjusted Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival and Cox regression models. To deal with confounding by indication, we estimated propensity scores for covariates with a standard difference greater than 0.1. Models were then adjusted using stratification and inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) methods. Multiple imputation (Imputation by Chained Equation method, N=20) was used to deal with missing data for covariates at treatment initiation.

Results: A total of 1318 patients initiated TNFi (n=825) or TOFA (n=493) with mean (SD) disease duration of 8.9 (9.3) and 13.0 (10.1) years, respectively. In the TNFi group, 78.8% were female and mean age (SD) at treatment initiation was 57.6 (12.6) years. In the TOFA group, 84.6% were female and mean (SD) age at treatment initiation was 59.5 (11.5) years. The TNFi group was less likely to have prior biologic use (33.9%) than the TOFA group (66.9%). At treatment initiation, the mean (SD) CDAI was significantly (p< 0.05) lower in the TNFi group [20.0 (11.7)] compared to the TOFA group [22.1(12.4)]. Physical function measured by HAQ-DI was also significantly lower (p< 0.05) in the TNFi compared to the TOFA group (1.2 vs.1.3).

Over a mean follow-up of 23.2 months, discontinuation was reported in 309 (37.5%) and 182 (36.9%) of all TNFi and TOFA patients, respectively. After adjusting for propensity score deciles across 20 imputed datasets, there was no significant difference in discontinuation between treatment groups (adjusted HRs: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.18; p=0.69). The results were similar for two propensity adjustment methods. Figure 1 shows IPTW adjusted KM survival curves comparing discontinuation rates in patients treated with TNFi and TOFA.

Conclusion: In this pooled real -world data study, we found that TNFi and TOFA retention is similar in patients with RA. In the next step we will analysis the data for specific reasons of discontinuation. We will also repeat analysis comparing discontinuation in the first users versus those after one or more biologic failure.

Figure 1. Note: Propensity Score Weighted (IPTW) Survival Curves was performed using one imputed dataset


Disclosures: M. Movahedi, None; D. Choquette, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Sandoz, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5, Teva Pharmaceuticals, 2, Gilead Sciences, 2; L. Coupal, None; A. Cesta, None; X. Li, None; E. Keystone, AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 2, Celltrion, 2, Gilead Sciences, 2, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, Merck, 2, 5, 6, Myriad Autoimmune, 2, Novartis, 6, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 6, PuraPharm, 5, Sandoz, 2, Sanofi-Genzyme, 2, 6, Samsung Bioepis, 2; C. Bombardier, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, BGP Pharma ULC, 1, 6, Gilead, 5, GSK, 1, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, 5, Medreleaf/Aurora, 5, Merck, 1, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, 1, 5, Sandoz, 5, Samsung Bioepis, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Movahedi M, Choquette D, Coupal L, Cesta A, Li X, Keystone E, Bombardier C. Discontinuation Rate of Tofacitinib Is Similar When Compared to TNF Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Pooled Data from Two Rheumatoid Arthritis Registries in Canada [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discontinuation-rate-of-tofacitinib-is-similar-when-compared-to-tnf-inhibitors-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-pooled-data-from-two-rheumatoid-arthritis-registries-in-canada/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discontinuation-rate-of-tofacitinib-is-similar-when-compared-to-tnf-inhibitors-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-pooled-data-from-two-rheumatoid-arthritis-registries-in-canada/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology