ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1048

Differences in Clinical Manifestations of SLE Across Four Racial/Ethnic Groups: The California Lupus Surveillance Project (CLSP)

Ernest Maningding1, Jinoos Yazdany2, Laura Trupin2, Chris Tonner3, Charles G. Helmick4 and Maria Dall'Era5, 1Internal Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, 2Medicine/Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 3Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 4CDC, Atlanta, GA, 5Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Clinical research, Lupus, race/ethnicity and severity, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment II: Clinical Trial Design

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: The CLSP is a population-based registry of individuals with SLE residing in San Francisco County, California from 2007 – 2009. The registry has a special focus on improving our understanding of SLE in Asian/Pacific Islander (PI) and Hispanic individuals, two groups previously understudied in population-based epidemiologic investigations. We used CLSP data to analyze differences in 1) lupus manifestations by sex and race/ethnicity and 2) time to development of these manifestations after disease onset.

Methods:   Relative risks (RR) of SLE manifestations were calculated using Poisson regression models adjusted for race/ethnicity, sex, age at SLE diagnosis, and duration of SLE disease. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods were used to analyze time to development of severe manifestations of SLE, with higher hazard ratios (HR) indicating a shorter time to development of specific manifestations.

Results: 724 prevalent cases of SLE were identified with the following distribution by race/ethnicity: white (26.2%), Black (18.8%), Asian/PI (36.9%), Hispanic (15.5%), missing (2.6%). For lupus manifestations, Blacks, Asians/PIs, and Hispanics had increased prevalence of lupus nephritis relative to whites (RR 1.78, RR 1.74, and RR 1.46, respectively). Furthermore, Blacks had increased neurological manifestations (RR 1.50), Asians/PIs had increased mucocutaneous manifestations (RR 1.16), and both Blacks and Asians/PIs had increased hematologic manifestations (RR 1.08 and RR 1.07, respectively). For time to development of manifestations, statistically significant differences in lupus nephritis (p < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (p = 0.006), and neuropsychiatric abnormalities (p = 0.042) were observed by race/ethnicity, though this was not the case in the analysis of antiphospholipid (APS) (P = 0.092). Blacks, Asians/PIs, and Hispanics had earlier development (higher hazards) of lupus nephritis, thrombocytopenia, and APS relative to whites. Men had earlier development of lupus nephritis and thrombocytopenia relative to women (Table).

Conclusion: This analysis represents the first epidemiologic study comparing lupus manifestations among four major racial/ethnic groups and includes large numbers of Asians/PIs and Hispanics. We found 1) dramatic differences in the prevalence of several clinical SLE manifestations among race/ethnicities and 2) that Blacks, Asians/PIs, and Hispanics are at increased risk of developing many manifestations earlier than whites following initial SLE diagnosis. Men also developed lupus nephritis and thrombocytopenia earlier than women with SLE.


Disclosure: E. Maningding, None; J. Yazdany, None; L. Trupin, None; C. Tonner, None; C. G. Helmick, None; M. Dall'Era, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maningding E, Yazdany J, Trupin L, Tonner C, Helmick CG, Dall'Era M. Differences in Clinical Manifestations of SLE Across Four Racial/Ethnic Groups: The California Lupus Surveillance Project (CLSP) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-in-clinical-manifestations-of-sle-across-four-racialethnic-groups-the-california-lupus-surveillance-project-clsp/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-in-clinical-manifestations-of-sle-across-four-racialethnic-groups-the-california-lupus-surveillance-project-clsp/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology