ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1432

Diagnostic Performance of Mayor Salivary Gland Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Sjögren’s Syndrome in Routine Clinical Practice

Carmen Raya-Santos1, José Miguel Senabre2, José Antonio Bernal3, Rocío Gallego Campuzano4, Lara Pons-Canet2, Ana Pons-Bas2, Juan Carlos Cortes4, Gregorio Santos-Soler5 and José Rosas-Gómez de Salazar6, 1Hospital Marina Baixa, Villajoyosa (Alicante), Spain, 2Hospital Marina Baixa, Villajoyosa, Spain, 3Hospital Marina Baixa (Villajoyosa), Alicante, Spain, 4Hospital Marina Baixa, Villajoyosa, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 5Hospital Marina Baixa, Villajoyosa, 6Hospital Marina Baixa, PALMA DE MALLORCA, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Diagnostic criteria, OMERACT, Sjögren's syndrome, Ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Sjögren's Syndrome – Basic & Clinical Science Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Major salivary glands ultrasound (SGU) is a promising tool in the diagnosis of Sjögren syndrome (SS) and has demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity in previous studies. However, its usefulness in daily rheumatology practice has not been completely established.
The objective of this study was to assess the performance of SGU for diagnose of SS in routine clinical practice.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional single center observational study. Patients with clinical suspicion (due to xerostomia, xerophthalmia or positive anti-Ro) or confirmed diagnosis of SS were included in the study. All patients underwent sialometry, Schirmer test and blood samples, including autoantibodies, as part of the routine clinical practice. SGU was performed in all patients by a rheumatologist who was unaware of clinical data. OMERACT semi-quantitative scoring system for SGU that grades each gland from 0 to 3 (parotid and submandibular) was evaluated. A cutoff of ≥2 in any of the four glands was selected because has shown good performance for the diagnosis of SS in previous studies. Demographic data and clinical history were collected, including minor salivary gland biopsy when available. Fulfilment of 2016 ACR/EULAR criteria for SS [2] was evaluated in each patient. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for sialometry and SGU.

Results: 81 patients were included, of which 76 (93.8%) were women. Of the total, 41 (50.6%) met the 2016 ACR/EULAR SS criteria. Anti-Ro/SSA antibody was positive in 54/81 (66.7%) and minor salivary gland biopsy was performed in 8 (9.9%) patients, being pathological in 6 (7.4%). Of the 40 patients who did not meet criteria for classification as SS, 13 (32.5%) had a Schirmer test < 5 mm, 7 (15.5%) had a basal sialometry < 1.5 mL in 15 minutes and 7 (17.5%) had an SGU with OMERACT ≥2. Of the 41 patients classified as SS, 22 (53.7%) had pathological Schirmer, 21 (51.2%) had a basal sialometry < 1.5 mL in 15 minutes and 29 (70.7%) had an SGU with OMERACT ≥ 2.

Sialometry had a sensitivity of 51.2% (36.5-65.7%) and a specificity of 82.5% (68.0-91.3%) for classification as SS, and SGU (OMERACT ≥2) had a sensitivity of 70.7% (55.5-82.4%) and a specificity of 82.5% (68.0-91.3%). The positive predictive value of the SGU was 80.6% (65.0-90.2%) and the negative predictive value was 73.3% (59.0-84.0%).

Conclusion: In our routine clinical practice, the diagnostic performance of SGU is good, superior to sialometry, although the latter is included in the ACR/EULAR criteria for SS and the SGU not.

Supporting image 1

Results of sialometry, Schirmer test and SGU

Supporting image 2

Individual diagnostic performance of each pair of glands taking the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria as the gold standard

Supporting image 3

Diagnostic performance of sialometry and SGU taking the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria as the gold standard


Disclosures: C. Raya-Santos: None; J. Senabre: None; J. Bernal: None; R. Gallego Campuzano: None; L. Pons-Canet: None; A. Pons-Bas: None; J. Cortes: None; G. Santos-Soler: None; J. Rosas-Gómez de Salazar: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Raya-Santos C, Senabre J, Bernal J, Gallego Campuzano R, Pons-Canet L, Pons-Bas A, Cortes J, Santos-Soler G, Rosas-Gómez de Salazar J. Diagnostic Performance of Mayor Salivary Gland Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Sjögren’s Syndrome in Routine Clinical Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/diagnostic-performance-of-mayor-salivary-gland-ultrasound-for-diagnosis-of-sjogrens-syndrome-in-routine-clinical-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/diagnostic-performance-of-mayor-salivary-gland-ultrasound-for-diagnosis-of-sjogrens-syndrome-in-routine-clinical-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology